This brotha spoke nothing but facts and I wish all the Princess Vegina Stan's would understand that GOATKU is the true prince of all Saiyans.
Bulma was a hoe who settled for a midget with a terrible hairline because she couldn't have GOATKU.
- Thread starter Rhapscallion Démone
- Start date
This brotha spoke nothing but facts and I wish all the Princess Vegina Stan's would understand that GOATKU is the true prince of all Saiyans.
richaveli83
Veteran
RamsayBolton
Superstar
i liked them being platonic for some reason 
DamienWayne
Superstar
Isn’t bulma like 10 - 15 years older than goku ? She was at least in highschool 2 college age in dragon ball and goku was like 6. always saw there relationship as big sister / mother type
Here come the nikka nerds 
ThrobbingHood
“I’m Sorry for 2025”
Negged for slandering the Saiyan Prince.
Belize King
I got concepts of a plan.
Goku said naw, forget all that.
Artificial Intelligence
Not Allen Iverson
Goku and bulma 
4 years. He was 12 when they met.
Kiyoshi-Dono
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 87,330
- Reputation
- 33,117
- Daps
- 468,295
- Reppin
- Petty Vandross.. fukk Yall
feelosofer
#ninergang
I said this in the Yamcha thread that Bulma was always wanted to ride on Goku's extenda-pole but Goku married young.
Her Loss
Woke up at 4 in the morning thinking about who Vegeta is fukking? Come on son.. all these threads on Vegeta tryna tear down the GOAT? Why we doing this? I don't even think nikkas be thinking about Goku like that. There may be some goku slander threads but its like a 10:1 ratio. We let Cacarot be a dead beat dumbass c00n on his own time. Let the Prince of all Saiyans be great.
I had to watch the full 20min video because no POAS slander shall be tolerated so lets chop this fable...
1.Whatever happened in Dragonball is irrelevant they were kids/teenagers.
2.Her thinking about Goku during the Namek saga is also irrelevant.. she was with Yamcha... *hands him another L*
3.He used future Bulma's words to make it seem like she was in love with Goku. Meanwhile she said nothing lustful if you switched the character to Krillin the words would have the same effect. Also in that timeline Vegeta was just clapping cheeks. He got killed by the androids while Trunks was a baby so there was no time for anything to develop.
4.Dude says yamcha's relationship with Bulma was on life support by the end of the cell saga... what show is this dude watching? They was broken up a long time ago. Vegeta been hittin since they got back from Namek.
5.He makes multiple claims that it took the 7yr time skip for Vegeta to get close with Bulma... he has no proof. I would assume Once cell killed Trunks and Vegeta went ham he stopped taking shyt for granted. He obviously spent time with Trunks if he was able to go super saiyan at age 5. He wa literally training him... so calling Vegeta a dead beat is also false. And I'm sure he got closer with Bulma at the time too. Still on his Vegeta shyt but he probably opened up a little. Besides Vegeta was mor likely a virgin before Bulma so you know once he got a taste he was probably hitting that 5 times a day... no time for her to lust after cac a rot
6.he uses a filler scene of Chi chi suggesting a wife swap and lies about Bulma's reaction. She clearly rolls her eyes and grunts in disapproval. He shows a screen shot of her looking up saying shes contemplating it.
7.he does this bullshyt to ship Bulma and Goku to go on to say future Trunks would be going back to save his brother.... there would be no gohan as we know him if goku got with bulma at the end of dragonball. And not the same trunks either.
fukk this video.... this is a neg worthy offense slandering the Prince.... you have been warned
I had to watch the full 20min video because no POAS slander shall be tolerated so lets chop this fable...
1.Whatever happened in Dragonball is irrelevant they were kids/teenagers.
2.Her thinking about Goku during the Namek saga is also irrelevant.. she was with Yamcha... *hands him another L*
3.He used future Bulma's words to make it seem like she was in love with Goku. Meanwhile she said nothing lustful if you switched the character to Krillin the words would have the same effect. Also in that timeline Vegeta was just clapping cheeks. He got killed by the androids while Trunks was a baby so there was no time for anything to develop.
4.Dude says yamcha's relationship with Bulma was on life support by the end of the cell saga... what show is this dude watching? They was broken up a long time ago. Vegeta been hittin since they got back from Namek.
5.He makes multiple claims that it took the 7yr time skip for Vegeta to get close with Bulma... he has no proof. I would assume Once cell killed Trunks and Vegeta went ham he stopped taking shyt for granted. He obviously spent time with Trunks if he was able to go super saiyan at age 5. He wa literally training him... so calling Vegeta a dead beat is also false. And I'm sure he got closer with Bulma at the time too. Still on his Vegeta shyt but he probably opened up a little. Besides Vegeta was mor likely a virgin before Bulma so you know once he got a taste he was probably hitting that 5 times a day... no time for her to lust after cac a rot
6.he uses a filler scene of Chi chi suggesting a wife swap and lies about Bulma's reaction. She clearly rolls her eyes and grunts in disapproval. He shows a screen shot of her looking up saying shes contemplating it.
7.he does this bullshyt to ship Bulma and Goku to go on to say future Trunks would be going back to save his brother.... there would be no gohan as we know him if goku got with bulma at the end of dragonball. And not the same trunks either.
fukk this video.... this is a neg worthy offense slandering the Prince.... you have been warned