The argument for Kobe groupies is that we can't say they're better because we weren't alive to see them play.The disrespect
Kareem is better than Kobe, fact.
You can also make the case Kareem is better than MJ.
If rings are a measure of achievement, then why do Bynum and Arizas health have anything to do with Kobes ring count? Using your own logic, Kobe didn't win in 2008 because he simply wasn't good enough. He would have the same 5 rings if he played with Smush Parker his whole career or if he played on an allstar team so there is no need to discuss hypotheticals. Sorry if you don't like this but it's your own script
If you were a real student of the game, you wouldn't dismiss statistics. They measure what actually happens on the court. Stats can be misleading and they can also be misinterpreted, but the eye test is far more unreliable, especially when they're the eyes of a biased Stan.
Without Shaq? He still had an all star big
beHavent read past the OP, but why is Scab's opinion worth 20pages?
prime ai and prime shaq wouldve won more titles than Kobe and Shaq too![]()
Someone needs to explain to me in what world Larry Bird is better than Kobe.
the real world breh
1. kobe
2. shaq
3. timmy
4. bron
5. kg
6. ai
7. pierce
8. dirk
9. kd
10.pau
dwade aint play enough games for me so i gotta take him out
tmac,vince,ray was good players but this my top 10
yes i was born in the 90s fukk the 80s