Sometime these CIOs gotta play chess to get funding. Doing that will cause bandwidth problems but he will be able to present the "problem" as an issue to the COO or CEO to increase funding for his division.
The other thing I've noticed is that the CIO job is a losers bracket for other departments. So they take a Marketing guy they think is good, but not COO good, but they don't want him to get poached either so they promote him to CIO where he doesn't know anything but feels pacified because now he's "C-level."
You hit the nail on the head.
And the reason why that's so true, is because unless you are outsourcing your internal technical services (which is extremely rare), IT does not produce money.
Yes they keep the company afloat, but to non-technical people who look at P and L statements all day and have to justify the department budget for IT.... maaaan.
Breh, 2 positions ago when I was a network engineer, they put the Manager of the Call Center as the VP for Engineering because "well, they both offer support"
You couldn't be more right with your assessment.