BREAKING: Boston bombing suspect suffers throat injury, may not be able to talk

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,486
Daps
26,223
It's only fishy because your kind ignores all other evidence and logistics that go with the story and only focus on the ones that support your case.

Because FBI was involved in cover-up COINTELPRO operations in the 60's and 70's they are behind bombing and shooting massacres that happen today as well?

:what:

I'm not ignoring anything about the story.. so far I know what you know. The difference is that I am naturally and rightfully skeptical about the official story and the back story that is being rolled out right now. I'm not on here creating a new story, so far I'm just paying attention and waiting for a time when I can know the truth.

And Cointelpro isn't the only fcked up thing that happening in American history - it's not the only thing that happened in the 60's n 70's. However, my point is that you and those like you were the SAME exact type of people calling Friends fools back them for even being skeptical. Ask anyone who was in any sort of movement back then, or at any time, and they will tell you there are always those that fall right in line with every official story.

I, along with 12 others, watched the news lie about dates and details of some sh1t I was directly involved in when I was in the military and now I'm supposed to go along and not ignore absolutely anything fishy, like a fckin fool?

When the Iran Contra sh1t was happening there were people who were calling foul... It took some random Iranian to leak it... then it went from conspiracy to US scandal.

This Boston sh1t just happened. So with the US governments history, FBI history, the history of media manipulation, the current culture of fear and painting of boogeymen, and the conflicting initial new reports... I'm the one 'ignoring' sh1t by being skeptical. Gtfoh. :rudy::rudy:

Your the type of person that if someone was like, yo did you know that the head of Chase bank, p bush, GM, goodyear, and a few others tried to use a military coup against FDR to create the Fascist US? you would be like "your type of people sound insane, lol, ha lol, ha.. blah blah".. Then you would find out it was true and be like, "well, duhhh everyone knows that sh1t, why wouldn't they have done something like that, lol, ha, lol, ha".

:rudy:
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,405
Daps
31,299
Reppin
NULL
I'm not ignoring anything about the story.. so far I know what you know. The difference is that I am naturally and rightfully skeptical about the official story and the back story that is being rolled out right now. I'm not on here creating a new story, so far I'm just paying attention and waiting for a time when I can know the truth.

And Cointelpro isn't the only fcked up thing that happening in American history - it's not the only thing that happened in the 60's n 70's. However, my point is that you and those like you were the SAME exact type of people calling Friends fools back them for even being skeptical. Ask anyone who was in any sort of movement back then, or at any time, and they will tell you there are always those that fall right in line with every official story.

I, along with 12 others, watched the news lie about dates and details of some sh1t I was directly involved in when I was in the military and now I'm supposed to go along and not ignore absolutely anything fishy, like a fckin fool?

When the Iran Contra sh1t was happening there were people who were calling foul... It took some random Iranian to leak it... then it went from conspiracy to US scandal.

This Boston sh1t just happened. So with the US governments history, FBI history, the history of media manipulation, the current culture of fear and painting of boogeymen, and the conflicting initial new reports... I'm the one 'ignoring' sh1t by being skeptical. Gtfoh. :rudy::rudy:

Your the type of person that if someone was like, yo did you know that the head of Chase bank, p bush, GM, goodyear, and a few others tried to use a military coup against FDR to create the Fascist US? you would be like "your type of people sound insane, lol, ha lol, ha.. blah blah".. Then you would find out it was true and be like, "well, duhhh everyone knows that sh1t, why wouldn't they have done something like that, lol, ha, lol, ha".

:rudy:

can you PM me about this?
 

Poppa_Dock

:gladlebron:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
4,200
Reputation
-430
Daps
2,909
Reppin
Banana Town
:dead: @ this thread

he has no voice so therefore he can't communicate info :dead:

nobody called for execution of colorado killer :deadrose:

im glad im not one of these dummies

BTW every conspiracy dude i know is a fukking loser, just wanted to add that :manny:
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,301
Reputation
101
Daps
15,192
I'm not ignoring anything about the story.. so far I know what you know. The difference is that I am naturally and rightfully skeptical about the official story and the back story that is being rolled out right now. I'm not on here creating a new story, so far I'm just paying attention and waiting for a time when I can know the truth.

Well it's one thing to be skeptical but still keeping an open mind about an event as oppose to using the Alex Jones approach and drawing a conclusion without waiting to see what evidence is being presented.

And Cointelpro isn't the only fcked up thing that happening in American history - it's not the only thing that happened in the 60's n 70's. However, my point is that you and those like you were the SAME exact type of people calling Friends fools back them for even being skeptical. Ask anyone who was in any sort of movement back then, or at any time, and they will tell you there are always those that fall right in line with every official story.

There's nothing wrong with being skeptical but it's another to draw a conclusion from one dubious claim over another and call yourself a "free thinker".

The thing is now there are numerable ways to access resources that can be used as a reference to counter claims, assumptions, and conclusions made by conspiracies. So the burden of evidence lays on the person that is using skepticism to draw their own conclusion of an event. For example if you were someone saying a high-level government official or FBI was behind the Boston Bombing you have to provide substantial, damning, undoubtful, evidence that can counter the claims made by the official story that says otherwise.

I, along with 12 others, watched the news lie about dates and details of some sh1t I was directly involved in when I was in the military and now I'm supposed to go along and not ignore absolutely anything fishy, like a fckin fool?

I don't believe or ever said the news tells everything 100% or uncovers every story but I do put more weight on their credibility than Infowars and Prison Planet. It's like preferring to read U.S. Weekly over National Enquirer.

When the Iran Contra sh1t was happening there were people who were calling foul... It took some random Iranian to leak it... then it went from conspiracy to US scandal.

This Boston sh1t just happened. So with the US governments history, FBI history, the history of media manipulation, the current culture of fear and painting of boogeymen, and the conflicting initial new reports... I'm the one 'ignoring' sh1t by being skeptical. Gtfoh. :rudy::rudy:

There's also no denying that the high level government officials has a history of doing unsavory things and participating in suspicious activities. But like I said earlier it's fine to be skeptical and say "There's probably more to this story from what the officials are saying." and then there's using the information given, claim it's a cover-up and then believe in/create baseless conclusions about it.

Your the type of person that if someone was like, yo did you know that the head of Chase bank, p bush, GM, goodyear, and a few others tried to use a military coup against FDR to create the Fascist US? you would be like "your type of people sound insane, lol, ha lol, ha.. blah blah".. Then you would find out it was true and be like, "well, duhhh everyone knows that sh1t, why wouldn't they have done something like that, lol, ha, lol, ha".

Well let's see:

I don't believe the government was behind or planned the 9/11 attacks.
I don't believe Timothy McVeigh had another person with him when he blew up the Federal Complex
I don't believe Sandy Hook/Aurora Shooting was a cover-up to take American citizen's guns away
I don't believe the Rothschild/Rockefeller/United Nations, etc. are implementing a plan to convert the world to be under authoritative control in a New World Order.
I don't believe this recent Boston Bombing was a false flag set-up by FBI or CIA

So far I have not been proven otherwise in my beliefs of these so until then the accusations made based on these are nothing more than...conspiracy.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,439
Reputation
4,065
Daps
46,596
Usually conspiracies have SOME tinge of truth to them....but in my opinion it takes away one important element...


Agency...


human beings have agency and crazy human beings have A LOT of it. Most conspiracies I hear don't take people autonomy into account. You can do what ever you want and I think to say EVERYONE is brainwashed to a point of total government control is silly.

Crazy nikkas have always existed and will always exist.
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,511
Reputation
5,966
Daps
63,073
Reppin
Knicks

the people of Watertown didn't seem to mind

10068781_H10354797-600x417.jpg



edit: maybe they were all government plants :ohhh:
 
Top