BREAKING: Boeing 737 crashes in Iran after takeoff..UPDATE: IRAN ADMITS IT SHOT IT DOWN ACCIDENTALLY

Xerces

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
12,225
Reputation
-1,685
Daps
23,230
Reppin
Texas
You think a little too highly of Trump. I would put nothing past him. Folk are claiming losses all around because everyone involved acted stupid. That goes for Trump, Iran, Airliner (shouldn't have taken off), etc.

I do think it's funny how the US has to kill this terrorist because he was so dangerous while backing it up for Putin and Kim Jong Un. Complete nonsense.

This Iranian was in Iraq ( Country where the United States was at the present time allowed to be operating in) , and killed Americans . If Putin, and Jong Un kill Americans in a way that is not pertaining to war, I'm pretty sure they would be dealt with in some kind of way. You show me a story of Putin, and Kim Jong Un killed an American in act of non war, and The American Gov't still " Back them up"

" I wouldn't put anything past him" is not proof...... of anything. It's not an argument for anything
 

Chrishaune

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Messages
36,175
Reputation
2,456
Daps
88,341
Reppin
Huntsville
Not down for anyone but myself and my family.

And yeah it's supposed to counter your point. This started because Trump killed an Irani General. A General from a country that has "killed innocent civilians". So that makes it OK to take him out? Using your logic and the logic of the Trump administration then it would be totally fine for another country to kill our Generals for the 100s of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians killed during Bush's war?


This started in ancient times if you really want to know the origins. They aren't going to stop trying to kill people no matter who is in office in America. It goes much deeper than most people realize. Only people with spiritual sense can see that.
 

Xerces

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
12,225
Reputation
-1,685
Daps
23,230
Reppin
Texas
Not down for anyone but myself and my family.

And yeah it's supposed to counter your point. This started because Trump killed an Irani General. A General from a country that has "killed innocent civilians". So that makes it OK to take him out? Using your logic and the logic of the Trump administration then it would be totally fine for another country to kill our Generals for the 100s of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians killed during Bush's war?



That is called "casualties of war" and it is beyond unfortunate. However, we are not in " declared state of War" with Iran, nor Iraq, when Soleimani killed those Americans.


And those countries are free to make the choice to kill anyone they want. If an American General, Colonel get's take out in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan etc then they get taken out. However, Actions have reactions
 

levitate

I love you, you know.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
38,922
Reputation
5,722
Daps
147,620
Reppin
The Multiverse
That is called "casualties of war" and it is beyond unfortunate. However, we are not in " declared state of War" with Iran, nor Iraq, when Soleimani killed those Americans.
An innocent death is an innocent death... doesn't matter if was a part of a "war". Particularly a war that was founded on lies of non-existent WMDs.
 

Copy Ninja

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
8,917
Reputation
629
Daps
31,964
shyt happens more often than you think. shyt america has the most state of the art technology and have shot down commercial planes before.

Hell in the 80s they shot down an Iranian airliner and had to pay iran 180 million.

Yeah in the 80s before we have all the satellites we have now.

Our satellites picked up those missiles Iran launched right away.
 

T-K-G

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
36,992
Reputation
5,300
Daps
106,579
Reppin
LWO/Starkset
An innocent death is an innocent death... doesn't matter if was a part of a "war". Particularly a war that was founded on lies of non-existent WMDs.
What? You'd be hard pressed to find any war that didnt have innocent deaths. Not a hill worth dying on. That's always been a "it is what it is" situation

You'd be hard pressed to find one that wasn't surrounded by lies too. The WMD shyt isn't the wildest lie that caused mass deaths in war

:mjlol: this is what war between humans comes down to. All that moral shyt goes out the window or you lose/die
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
57,506
Reputation
3,902
Daps
172,300
This Iranian was in Iraq ( Country where the United States was at the present time allowed to be operating in) , and killed Americans . If Putin, and Jong Un kill Americans in a way that is not pertaining to war, I'm pretty sure they would be dealt with in some kind of way. You show me a story of Putin, and Kim Jong Un killed an American in act of non war, and The American Gov't still " Back them up"

" I wouldn't put anything past him" is not proof...... of anything. It's not an argument for anything

"pretty sure" huh? :mjlol:
 

Xerces

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
12,225
Reputation
-1,685
Daps
23,230
Reppin
Texas
An innocent death is an innocent death... doesn't matter if was a part of a "war". Particularly a war that was founded on lies of non-existent WMDs.

I just said that it was unfortunate you dummy. And I agree with non existent comment on WMD's. However, Why aggy With Trump on this? Trump is against the Bush's, Clinton's etc. The Bush's, and Clintons of the world are what Trump is trying to get out of Washington.
 

Xerces

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
12,225
Reputation
-1,685
Daps
23,230
Reppin
Texas
"pretty sure" huh? :mjlol:

Yea, Because I'm just a regular person. I am in no way shape or form in Washington listening too or making choices. So being a person that doesn't need to know such as yourself, I can only some what speculate.

:russ: @ you thinking you had some sort intelligent " got ya" moment there.
 

levitate

I love you, you know.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
38,922
Reputation
5,722
Daps
147,620
Reppin
The Multiverse
I just said that it was unfortunate you dummy. And I agree with non existent comment on WMD's. However, Why aggy With Trump on this? Trump is against the Bush's, Clinton's etc. The Bush's, and Clintons of the world are what Trump is trying to get out of Washington.

Where did I imply that you said it wasn't unfortunate? I know it's hard for you with your sub-100 IQ, but at least try to increase your reading comprehension before engaging in a conversation with me. I'm not coming at you, so don't come at me with insults.
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
14,203
Reputation
2,661
Daps
54,224
Reppin
NULL
I just said that it was unfortunate you dummy. And I agree with non existent comment on WMD's. However, Why aggy With Trump on this? Trump is against the Bush's, Clinton's etc. The Bush's, and Clintons of the world are what Trump is trying to get out of Washington.
:laugh:

so he's just trying to drain the swamp, huh?
 
Top