I don't think your grasping where I'm coming from. Yes the city is well "presured", but has it been completely dug up? More importantly does Sudan have the same financial funding and hell ambition like the Egyptologist in Egypt?
I clicked the links(good links btw) and the city of Dangeil still has not been fully excavated. More importantly as far as I know the city of Kerma which is important to early Sudan history has still not been fully excavated where you can see the whole city and they have been working on it since 2000 according to your links.
If what I am saying is not the case then we shouldn't just be seeing this.
^^^Egypt was just like that when archaeologist first entered Egypt, but they dug it all up. But most of the cities now are dug up where you can fully SEE them. If this is the case for Sudan, than give me an example where a city is buried and it has been completely dug up.
My point is that archological work in the rest of Africa does not have the same financial fundings and ambition as Egypt. This is a fact.
Thanks.