Brandon Thurston of Wrestlenomics on Talk is Jericho

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
Thought this was a pretty good episode, provides a lot of information behind the economics of wrestling, mostly regarding all the media and TV ratings stuff. Interview not exclusive to covering AEW as it also covers WWE.

 

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
Some interesting points after about 25 minutes...

AEW's TV deal in the UK is actually bigger and gets better ratings than WWE because it's on the top channel in the UK while WWE isn't on that channel. Never would have guessed that.

The networks don't give a shyt about total viewership. 18-49 demo rating is the only thing they care about because the advertisers generally only care about the demo. 50+ aren't susceptible to advertising as much because they are set in their ways, basically, so those viewers don't really bring much value to advertisers.

1/4 of WWE's TV viewers watch it on DVR and not live.

A 2004 episode of Raw had a median age of 34. Today it is 54. So essentially the same people who were watching in 2004 are the same people watching today.
 

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
20% of Dynamite viewers watch it on DVR, 30% of Rampage viewers watch it on DVR

The median NXT viewer is 60. Old ass motherfukkers :mjlol:

He thinks Rampage would be a really good fit for a streamer to expand its reach because it gets preempted a lot due to its TV time slot.

While the value in cable is dwindling, it's still considerably more profitable than streaming.

Credits the Peacock deal for the increasing popularity of WWE due to the much greater and more accessible access to the PLEs.

Says he hears AEW is working on possibly doing a FAST channel - Free Ad Supported TV - like Tubi and Pluto. Had not heard about this.
 
Last edited:

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
Ads chase off about 20% of an audience.

YouTube highlight clip views are more telling than quarter hours as far as what is likely generating TV viewers due to being able to analyze viewership segment by segment and without commercials.

The next AEW TV deal should valued at $220 million. It's currently $44 million. Says even just a 2x increase would be a pretty significant deal for AEW for their long term viability.

WWE should be getting a 1.5x increase in their next TV deal.
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
40,161
Reputation
5,558
Daps
159,775
Reppin
Dallas, TX
Delete this thread creh, and I highly doubt that the next AEW deal is going to be $220 a year:mjlol:. Also Rampage does not get preempted a lot, it's only for certain things like the NBA playoffs. He's also still trying to push the whole AEW = young/WWE = old narrative wen you can clearly see just how young the WWE crowd is. I've seen this guy's Twitter account, and it's all based on trying to make every AEW rating look like a big W. If he truly believed networks didn't care about viewership, then he wouldn't hype them up when they get over a million viewers.
 
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
8,669
Reputation
4,100
Daps
47,723
Reppin
LDN
AEW's TV deal in the UK is actually bigger and gets better ratings than WWE because it's on the top channel in the UK while WWE isn't on that channel. Never would have guessed that.
Yeah, this is simply bullshyt. Dynamite is shown at 11:30pm on a Friday night on ITV4, which is a minor subsidiary channel of ITV, which is a non-public broadcaster channel in the UK. If on-demand counts then it probably gets more views than WWE, because WWE is on a premium pay channel, but there is absolutely no chance in hell that the TV deal is better.

This dude seems like an AEW cheerleader if he’s putting out information that’s disingenuous at best and outright lies at worst.
 

Redguard

Hoonding
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
10,380
Reputation
1,352
Daps
29,682
Reppin
Hammerfell
Some interesting points after about 25 minutes...

AEW's TV deal in the UK is actually bigger and gets better ratings than WWE because it's on the top channel in the UK while WWE isn't on that channel. Never would have guessed that.

The networks don't give a shyt about total viewership. 18-49 demo rating is the only thing they care about because the advertisers generally only care about the demo. 50+ aren't susceptible to advertising as much because they are set in their ways, basically, so those viewers don't really bring much value to advertisers.

1/4 of WWE's TV viewers watch it on DVR and not live.

A 2004 episode of Raw had a median age of 34. Today it is 54. So essentially the same people who were watching in 2004 are the same people watching today.

So basically the wrestling audience isn't growing. That's not good for the industry.
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
40,161
Reputation
5,558
Daps
159,775
Reppin
Dallas, TX
Yeah, this is simply bullshyt. Dynamite is shown at 11:30pm on a Friday night on ITV4, which is a minor subsidiary channel of ITV, which is a non-public broadcaster channel in the UK. If on-demand counts then it probably gets more views than WWE, because WWE is on a premium pay channel, but there is absolutely no chance in hell that the TV deal is better.

This dude seems like an AEW cheerleader if he’s putting out information that’s disingenuous at best and outright lies at worst.
The ratings/viewership part is where you can see him being a liar. AEW is not having themed episodes every other week and teasing surprises in hopes to gain demos, and Retribution was a direct result of the USA network wanting the WWE to do something to get the numbers up. You can also see literally every other network tout their viewership numbers, just look at how FOX plasters the ratings for their NFL games.
 

Finn Baller

Superstar
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
7,680
Reputation
2,058
Daps
30,305
That loser is best friends with Chris Harrington (AEW executive) and trained little Daniel Garcia. He’s a failed Indy wrestler who now pretends to be a media expert who twists himself into pretzels to spin everything positive for AEW. Might as well post highlights of the Donald Trump Jr episode of Jericho’s podcast while you’re at it, same level of credibility
 

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
Deny it all you want, but the 18-49 demo is all the advertisers care about. It's not hard to find other people/websites dedicated to the TV/advertising industry who say the same thing about the 18-49 demo

 

Cattle Mutilation

Superstar
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
27,465
Reputation
1,230
Daps
42,415
Delete this thread creh, and I highly doubt that the next AEW deal is going to be $220 a year:mjlol:. Also Rampage does not get preempted a lot, it's only for certain things like the NBA playoffs. He's also still trying to push the whole AEW = young/WWE = old narrative wen you can clearly see just how young the WWE crowd is. I've seen this guy's Twitter account, and it's all based on trying to make every AEW rating look like a big W. If he truly believed networks didn't care about viewership, then he wouldn't hype them up when they get over a million viewers.
He said it should be valued at $220 million. Should doesn't equal will.
 

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,672
Reputation
1,765
Daps
47,748
Delete this thread creh, and I highly doubt that the next AEW deal is going to be $220 a year:mjlol:. Also Rampage does not get preempted a lot, it's only for certain things like the NBA playoffs. He's also still trying to push the whole AEW = young/WWE = old narrative wen you can clearly see just how young the WWE crowd is. I've seen this guy's Twitter account, and it's all based on trying to make every AEW rating look like a big W. If he truly believed networks didn't care about viewership, then he wouldn't hype them up when they get over a million viewers.

I'd be surprised if they got that amount (I think WWE gets 250 million a year from Fox if I'm not mistaken) but them getting $100-120 million a year in next tv deal isn't that far fetched.
 
Top