
quick reading breh..catch rep..but my point still stands...you cant dismiss toney and mayorga regardless of what they are now..hell james toney as a boxer and former champion is more notable than holly holm was or will ever be...going through that thread there were a lot of nikkas who had no idea who holm was much less that she used box pro..i myself dont see it as a win for boxing overall and boxing is my favorite sport....it was nice watching it executed at the level it was..all it is was rousey getting a weakness exploited in her game...the majority of misguided nikkas that posted about this fight think its a win for boxing because she talked shyt to floyd mayweather..he's the only boxer that has been thrown around in these examples lol..its a win for boxing if women's pro boxing gets more air time because of this fight..not because a woman boxer leaves pro to do MMA..my opinion
You know damn well James Toney wasn't even shyt in boxing at the point, he was all upper body movement, at the point, and a stationary target to be taking down
if he was on his toes moving, randy would not have been able to time the single leg
you know damn well not all boxers are the same mayoga is flat footed
I always said boxers who move well, will easily beat mma fighters, because they do not understand 360 degree movement for the most part
the muy thai stance leaves the center line completely exposed, prime example was in the fight before ronda's, the girl kept getting hit with a front kick straight through her guard
ronda got the damn straight left straight straight there her guard the same way