Botham Shem Jean case:Newly elected Dallas DA says ‘appropriate charge’ for Amber Guyger is murder

Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
753
Reputation
300
Daps
2,044
Reppin
Brooklyn
They’ll go for murder but they’ll lose the case on that charge
:snooze:
I was looking for someone to say this... i don’t want to get too conspiracy theorist on this but

... being that murder is probably the hardest charge to prove , is the intent to have her walk altogether and say “a jury of her peers didn’t believe that was her intent”?

The best charge for something like this unfortunately is manslaughter or negligent homicide when dealing with a cop. They will always protect them.

as soon as we realize life ain’t fair and never will be the sooner we will start maneuvering better in there little web and gain the advantage.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
52,946
Reputation
-3,457
Daps
137,285
Reppin
Na
John-Creuzot-960x616.png


Is he black? Almost looks like one of those white IG thots pretending to be light skinned

Bruh you’re an idiot
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
52,946
Reputation
-3,457
Daps
137,285
Reppin
Na
:dahell::dahell::dahell:

Why would she beat a murder charge exactly?

Intent means that the she shot with the intent of kill (which she did).
There is clearly intent here.

Manslaughter implies accidental death, like if she bumped into him and he happened to fall down the stairs and break his neck. That's manslaughter.

In what world is pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger and accidental killing? :dahell:

They wont get first degree (premediation), but they should be able to get 2nd degree (intent)

Right
If we keep under charging cops because they’re cops that creates another problem
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,664
Reputation
13,401
Daps
294,931
Reppin
NULL
Talking sounds good but come back when he acts on this and convicts her. Black people in Ferguson elected a new DA but have we seen any actions on Darren Wilson?
tbh, i think that ship has sailed :yeshrug: theres no way anyone is gonna have the political balls to hit darren wilson with charges at this point

i just hope that this fukking c*nt pig gets the book thrown at her
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
33,789
Reputation
7,947
Daps
182,981
Sometimes they overcharge cops to get a mistrial or innocent verdict. But she wasn’t on duty, so I don’t know if this applies here.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
39,878
Reputation
20,309
Daps
125,865
She confessed to shooting him on purpose. There is no other appropriate charge. Her intent was to shoot to kill. It was not accidental.

Most cops shoot on purpose. That's different than going to his apartment to shoot him. They may not have enough evidence to convict her of murder. But they do have enough to charge her with manslaughter.

The judge may allow the jury to charge her with both. IOW, if the jury isn't convinced of murder, then they can convict on manslaughter.
 

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,425
That's because Darren Wilson was set free by a grand jury

A prosecutor needs an indictment before they can charge someone...

So once Darren Wilson wasn't indicted...he was free to go...
this is what happens when we tell black folks not to vote,
t
 

Astroslik

Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
28,264
Reputation
2,816
Daps
84,868
Where do you coli clowns get yall law degrees from?:mjlol:the bytch aimed down the sights but didnt mean to cause harm?
There’s a difference between having the intent to aim and shoot and having the intent to go inside someone’s apartment to aim shoot and kill someone.



This should be an open and shut MANSLAUGHTER case

Where did you get your law degree from breh? Just curious


Edit- just realized this was a 2nd degree murder charge
 
Last edited:

Gold

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
43,670
Reputation
19,591
Daps
292,425
Most cops shoot on purpose. That's different than going to his apartment to shoot him. They may not have enough evidence to convict her of murder. But they do have enough to charge her with manslaughter.

The judge may allow the jury to charge her with both. IOW, if the jury isn't convinced of murder, then they can convict on manslaughter.

I think you (and others) are confusing intent with premeditation. :patrice:


Intent means, "Your intent when you pulled your gun and shot him was to kill him"

Manslaughter would be accidental/negligence/self-defense.

For example "I didn't know that leaving the stove on would cause an explosion that killed someone"
Or "I didn't intend to kill someone when I bumped into him and he fell down 3 flights of stairs"
Or "I was defending myself"

For intent it doesn't matter why she went to this apartment. Only matters what her intent was when she pulled the trigger.

Charging her for anything less is a travesty of justice.

But I get what you're saying, its America, for all we know she may walk free :snoop:
 

Gold

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
43,670
Reputation
19,591
Daps
292,425
There’s a difference between having the intent to aim and shoot and having the intent Togo inside someone’s was apartment to aim shoot and kill someone.


Where did you get your law degree from breh? Just curious

You (like everyone else in this thread) are going outside of the scope of intent and into the scope of premeditation.
Why she went to his apartment would matter if they were trying for with 1st degree.

But they aren't

What matters is what her intent was when pulled the trigger.

She could have a manslaughter case if she tazed him and he happened to die from that. She could argue her intent was to stun/incapacitate.

But this aint that.
 

Astroslik

Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
28,264
Reputation
2,816
Daps
84,868
You (like everyone else in this thread) are going outside of the scope of intent and into the scope of premeditation.
Why she went to his apartment would matter if they were trying for with 1st degree.

But they aren't

What matters is what her intent was when pulled the trigger.

She could have a manslaughter case if she tazed him and he happened to die from that. She could argue her intent was to stun/incapacitate.

But this aint that.
For some reason I thought he was charging her with FIRST degree murder not second. (Was late as fukk last night when I read this thread)

I’ll take my L
 

Nigerianwonder

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,534
Reputation
1,826
Daps
29,187
Reppin
NULL
Most cops shoot on purpose. That's different than going to his apartment to shoot him. They may not have enough evidence to convict her of murder. But they do have enough to charge her with manslaughter.

The judge may allow the jury to charge her with both. IOW, if the jury isn't convinced of murder, then they can convict on manslaughter.

There is no premeditation standard for murder in Texas as they don't have 1st or second degree murder. It's just a murder charge. Which is why its open and shut with regards to charging her with murder. You cant charge manslaughter when you have a confession of murder.
 
Top