I was looking for someone to say this... i don’t want to get too conspiracy theorist on this butThey’ll go for murder but they’ll lose the case on that charge
Is he black? Almost looks like one of those white IG thots pretending to be light skinned
Why would she beat a murder charge exactly?
Intent means that the she shot with the intent of kill (which she did).
There is clearly intent here.
Manslaughter implies accidental death, like if she bumped into him and he happened to fall down the stairs and break his neck. That's manslaughter.
In what world is pointing a gun at someone and pulling the trigger and accidental killing?
They wont get first degree (premediation), but they should be able to get 2nd degree (intent)
tbh, i think that ship has sailed theres no way anyone is gonna have the political balls to hit darren wilson with charges at this pointTalking sounds good but come back when he acts on this and convicts her. Black people in Ferguson elected a new DA but have we seen any actions on Darren Wilson?
She confessed to shooting him on purpose. There is no other appropriate charge. Her intent was to shoot to kill. It was not accidental.
this is what happens when we tell black folks not to vote,That's because Darren Wilson was set free by a grand jury
A prosecutor needs an indictment before they can charge someone...
So once Darren Wilson wasn't indicted...he was free to go...
There’s a difference between having the intent to aim and shoot and having the intent to go inside someone’s apartment to aim shoot and kill someone.Where do you coli clowns get yall law degrees from?the bytch aimed down the sights but didnt mean to cause harm?
Most cops shoot on purpose. That's different than going to his apartment to shoot him. They may not have enough evidence to convict her of murder. But they do have enough to charge her with manslaughter.
The judge may allow the jury to charge her with both. IOW, if the jury isn't convinced of murder, then they can convict on manslaughter.
There’s a difference between having the intent to aim and shoot and having the intent Togo inside someone’s was apartment to aim shoot and kill someone.
Where did you get your law degree from breh? Just curious
For some reason I thought he was charging her with FIRST degree murder not second. (Was late as fukk last night when I read this thread)You (like everyone else in this thread) are going outside of the scope of intent and into the scope of premeditation.
Why she went to his apartment would matter if they were trying for with 1st degree.
But they aren't
What matters is what her intent was when pulled the trigger.
She could have a manslaughter case if she tazed him and he happened to die from that. She could argue her intent was to stun/incapacitate.
But this aint that.
For some reason I thought he was charging her with FIRST degree murder not second.
I’ll take my L
Most cops shoot on purpose. That's different than going to his apartment to shoot him. They may not have enough evidence to convict her of murder. But they do have enough to charge her with manslaughter.
The judge may allow the jury to charge her with both. IOW, if the jury isn't convinced of murder, then they can convict on manslaughter.