Boiler Room: The Official Stock Market Discussion

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,614
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,449
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
I've known that they can pay off big, but they are extremely risky. I have just never wanted to take that amount of risk, as it all depends on the price AND the time period as well.

Essentially, if you risk $1,000 worth of the options, the MOST you can lose is $1,000. If you hit the strike price or beyond, you can make a LOT of money. However, you have to be correct about the time period which makes it extremely difficult.

Let's say you have $10,000, but don't want to put $10,000 into a stock like Alibaba. You can purchase some options (you have to purchased in terms of 100 shares) at a price of say $3.21. If it hits the strike price by the time the option expires, you can make a lot of money without having risked too much and tied up that $10,000 into it. However, if it does not hit that price within that time period, you are out the 100x$3.21.



Do you trade options @Domingo Halliburton ?

I have. I don't have any positions open right now. But like you said they're can be a lot of risk i.e. They expire out of the money and you've now lost your principal. The guy who trades them all the time is @Brady Hoke's Artery
 

TRFG

Not who you think
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
13,798
Reputation
275
Daps
38,510
I've known that they can pay off big, but they are extremely risky. I have just never wanted to take that amount of risk, as it all depends on the price AND the time period as well.

Essentially, if you risk $1,000 worth of the options, the MOST you can lose is $1,000. If you hit the strike price or beyond, you can make a LOT of money. However, you have to be correct about the time period which makes it extremely difficult.

Let's say you have $10,000, but don't want to put $10,000 into a stock like Alibaba. You can purchase some options (you have to purchased in terms of 100 shares) at a price of say $3.21. If it hits the strike price by the time the option expires, you can make a lot of money without having risked too much and tied up that $10,000 into it. However, if it does not hit that price within that time period, you are out the 100x$3.21.



Do you trade options @Domingo Halliburton ?

How close do you need to be to the match price?
 

TDOT4LIFE

Rookie
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
468
Reputation
70
Daps
301
Reppin
T.DOT
I've known that they can pay off big, but they are extremely risky. I have just never wanted to take that amount of risk, as it all depends on the price AND the time period as well.

Essentially, if you risk $1,000 worth of the options, the MOST you can lose is $1,000. If you hit the strike price or beyond, you can make a LOT of money. However, you have to be correct about the time period which makes it extremely difficult.

Let's say you have $10,000, but don't want to put $10,000 into a stock like Alibaba. You can purchase some options (you have to purchased in terms of 100 shares) at a price of say $3.21. If it hits the strike price by the time the option expires, you can make a lot of money without having risked too much and tied up that $10,000 into it. However, if it does not hit that price within that time period, you are out the 100x$3.21.



Do you trade options @Domingo Halliburton ?

Is it better to close out the position if you are in a positive return with the option or is better to sell the option before it expires?
 

Ohene

Free Sheist
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
72,616
Reputation
6,090
Daps
124,728
Reppin
Toronto
I think Twitter is a good look right now I can't see it getting much worse. I am going to ride out my short on KORS and consider this as a next play.

@Bernie Madoff is this a 6-12 month long forecast?
you mya be right that it cant get worse...but honestly speaking its still overvalued. i wanna see what the nfl deal does for its revenue next year
 

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
432
Daps
17,295
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
Investor group launches campaign to curb antibiotic use in f...

LONDON/LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Fifty four large investors managing 1 trillion pounds ($1.41 trillion) in assets have launched a campaign to curb the use of antibiotics in the meat and poultry used by ten large U.S. and British restaurant groups.
McDonalds
and JD Wetherspoon were among those to receive a March 15 letter from institutions including Aviva Investors asking them to set a timeline to stop the use of medically important antibiotics in their supply chains.

The other eight approached were Domino's Pizza Group, Brinker International, Darden Restaurants, Mitchells & Butlers, Restaurant Brands International, Restaurant Group, The Wendy's Company and Yum! Brands.

The move follows warnings from the World Health Organization that the world is moving towards a post-antibiotic era in which many infections would no longer be treatable because of the overuse of antibiotics.

Eighty percent of antibiotics produced in the United States are given to livestock, the coalition said in a statement, adding that failure to confront their "irresponsible" use threatens both health and investor returns.

"These large food companies are key ingredients in the portfolios of most of our pensions and savings, thus it is a case of proper risk-management to ask them to work out how they will meet this challenge," said Jeremy Coller, chief investment officer of Coller Capital.

"The world is changing, regulation on antibiotic use is set to tighten and consumer preferences are shifting away from factory farmed food. As stewards of these food companies and responsible investors, we want to protect both human health and shareholder value."

Drug-resistant infections could cost the world about $100 trillion in lost output by 2050, the coalition statement said, citing recent academic research.

Among other investors to sign the letter were Boston Common Asset Management, Impax Asset Management and EdenTree Investment Management.

Domino's Pizza Group spokeswoman Nina Arnott said the company's suppliers only used antibiotics when necessary to treat disease, under veterinary supervision, and that they are not used to prevent disease or boostlivestock growth.

"We are also encouraging our suppliers to reduce the use of antibiotics for therapeutic purposes, and trials are under way to assess the feasibility of achieving this goal," she said.

In a written response dated March 24, JD Wetherspoon said that growth-promoting substances, including antibiotics, were already banned across all of its livestock supply chains.

Mitchells & Butlers said the use of antibiotics in livestock production is an important issue and the company is reviewing the matter across all species as part of its sourcing policy.

The Restaurant Group, meanwhile, said that it ensured responsible animal welfare standards throughout its supply chain and it is a strict requirement of suppliers' contracts that antibiotics are used only for the treatment of disease.

McDonalds said it had received the letter and would respond to the coalition. Yum!, Wendy's, Darden and Brinker did not immediately respond to requests for comment, while a Restaurant Brands representative was not immediately available for comment.
 
Top