Please no one take this the wrong way. But the whole thing about keeping your portfolio tight (Preferably 3 but no more than 12) was something I've been harping on all year. It's called the "All In Gang" strategy, and as you can see, it clearly works. I'm not saying
@Serious specifically followed my blueprint (even if he did it's all good, that's what we're here for) but I don't believe anyone's M1 was anywhere close to around 6 symbols before I stated it. But thanks to Serious for providing proof of concept in case anyone doubted the method.
As far as
@Serious is concerned, proud of you bra. It seems you are finding the perfect balance between meme trader aggressive growth and boomer consistency. Salute.
I definitely believe in the "All In" mantra. It is how I want to play: 2-3 high-conviction stocks.
@FabTrey mentioned that he is focused on finding stocks where he sees a clear path to 10x. That's a high ass standard, but I know it is the path to wealth.
Right now, my standards are a bit lower, I am looking for stocks that I believe can 3-5x within two years in this low interest rate environment.
One of the most underappreciated
parts of the approach
@Serious has laid out is when he tries to enter trades.
He tries to enter only after some Big Money gets in. Then, he tries to front run the second and third wave of Big Money. You've mentioned this, too. You were probably the first to do so.
That really is our big advantage: we can beat most of Big Money into a stock.
Some of these firms have strict rules. Some only allocate, and re-allocate funds once a week, or once a month, and even once a quarter.
That's one of the reasons that being able to see Ark's trades is so important, it gives us a jump on identifying where Big Money might go.