Bloomberg: Why Black Americans Stay Poor Despite College, Employment & Marriage (ARTICLE)

Theraflu

Newly-wed :blessed:
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
12,974
Reputation
6,532
Daps
59,356
Reppin
Power
U.S. ECONOMY

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...americans-poor

Why Black Americans Stay Poor

1038
FEB 13, 2017 6:00 AM EST

ByMark Whitehouse


Over the past few decades, black Americans have gained on whites in a lot of areas, including education, two-parent families and employment. Sadly, that doesn’t appear to have helped them erase what may be the most important disparity: wealth.

My Bloomberg colleague Peter Coy reported last week on a study exploring the idea that racial wealth inequality stems from life choices and personal achievement -- that is, that blacks would be as rich as whites if only they got good educations, formed stronger families, worked hard and saved money.

Using data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, the researchers found that, as of 2013, none of that seemed to matter: Whether they were college-educated, married with kids, employed full-time or prudent savers, black families’ net worth was invariably many times lower than that of white families with the same characteristics.

The result was so striking that I decided to take another look: If a 2013 snapshot suggested that all those factors had no effect, would the same be true over time? That is, how had the education, family structure, employment and savings patterns of black families changed, and had that helped them close the wealth gap at all?

The chronological picture is depressingly similar. In many areas -- college education, two-parent families, employment -- black families made progress toward closing the gap with whites from 1989 to 2013 (the earliest and latest data available). But the wealth gap ended up larger than ever. Here’s how that looks:
Closing the Gap?


Ratio of black families to white families

Note: Straight ratio for net worth; for all others, share of black households divided by share of white households with the given characteristic. *Head of household. **Average, not median.

This fits with the explanations Coy offers in his piece. For one, whites start out with an advantage: They tend to get more and larger inheritances. Also, generations of discrimination -- including redlining, mass incarceration and predatory finance -- have prevented blacks from building up wealth. Note, for example, how the wealth gap widened following the subprime-mortgage crisis of 2007, a debacle that involved a lot of bad lending focused on black neighborhoods.

What to do? Beyond enforcing anti-discrimination laws and reforming the criminal justice system, a lot can be done to boost the returns to education and work. People should be able to live where opportunities are -- which meansbreaking down barriers such as zoning laws that discourage the construction of affordable housing in desirable neighborhoods and prevent people of color from moving there. Also, employers should pay more attention to racial disparities in wages and benefits -- which research has demonstrated to be significant, even for people with the same qualifications doing the same work.


Such issues don’t appear to be anywhere on President Donald Trump’s list of priorities. Maintaining barriers to prosperity for a large portion of the population, though, is no way to make America great.



https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...cks-in-america


The Big Reason Whites Are Richer Than Blacks in America

Inheritance matters a lot more than previously thought. Guess who’s getting the lion’s share.

by Peter Coy


The gap between blacks and whites in income is big, but nowhere near as big as the gap in wealth. According to the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, as of 2013 the median white household had $13 in net wealth for every $1 in net wealth of the median black household. For whites vs. Latinos, the gap was only a bit smaller, $10 vs. $1.


A new study trashes most of the conventional explanations—and solutions—for the wealth gap. It’s called The Asset Value of Whiteness: Understanding the Racial Wealth Gap. It’s by researchers at Brandeis University and a public policy group called Demos. The table of contents says it all:

  • Attending college does not close the racial wealth gap.
  • Raising children in a two-parent household does not close the racial wealth gap.
  • Working full time does not close the racial wealth gap.
  • Spending less does not close the racial wealth gap.

“In some ways this report is a myth-buster. It’s looking at popular assumptions and challenging them,” Amy Traub, the associate director for policy research at Demos and co-author of the study, said in an interview.
Take college attendance. Getting higher education helps African Americans earn more money and accumulate more wealth, of course. Even so, the median white adult who attended college has 7.2 times the wealth of the median black adult who attended college, according to the study. Likewise with working full-time and raising children in a two-parent household: whites who do those things have greater wealth than blacks who do those things.

It’s natural to assume that if blacks have less wealth it’s because they’re doing less saving—i.e., more of each dollar of income is going to consumption. The opposite is the case, according to a Duke University study published last year and cited by the authors. At every income level, blacks spend less than similarly situated whites, the Duke researchers found: “Retail desertification in racially segregated neighborhoods, restricted access to affordable credit for blacks, and consumer racial discrimination, we argue, result in lower overall spending for blacks at all income levels,” they said.

To some, the report is depressing. “Bottom line, for people of color, working ourselves to the bone and doing all the right things is getting us nowhere,” Fortune Senior Editor Ellen McGirt wrote in a commentary on f


So what does account for the racial gap in wealth? Traub admits that “we haven’t fully penetrated the mystery.” One powerful factor seems to be that whites are five times as likely as blacks to receive substantial gifts and inheritances, and the sums they get tend to be much larger. The money “can be used to jump-start further wealth accumulation, for example, by enabling white families to buy homes and begin acquiring equity earlier in their lives,” the study says.The result is that whites’ wealth advantage—and blacks’ disadvantage—gets passed down from generation to generation. Which means that forms of racial discrimination “that happened in the past, like redlining, continue to show up in bank accounts today,” says Traub.

Discrimination isn’t just a problem of the past, Traub says. She points to another studyshe co-wrote on racial steering in mortgages. In 2012, for example, Wells Fargo & Co. paid at least $175 million to settle allegations that it steered thousands of black and Latino borrowers into subprime mortgages when non-Hispanic white borrowers with similar credit profiles received prime loans. Prosecutors called the steering a “racial surtax.” Wells Fargo admitted no wrongdoing.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,282
Reputation
26,229
Daps
490,531
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Article is kinda disingenuous. We have to START somewhere which is why college educated, employed, married, etc. blacks are important. You have to get to the point where you can start handing down wealth generationally. We gotta generate that first before we can hand it down. We can't go from zero to 60 in just one or 2 generations. Cacs already have a massive headstart.
 

Big Blue

Superstar
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
18,863
Reputation
775
Daps
48,444
Reppin
Brooklyn
Article is kinda disingenuous. We have to START somewhere which is why college educated, employed, married, etc. blacks are important. You have to get to the point where you can start handing down wealth generationally.
True, but i think the point they're trying to make is that none of the above is not enough. It will take decades of socioeconomic mobility for black people to close the gap.
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
37,943
Reputation
3,398
Daps
150,956
Didn't read the article, we already know the answers. Don't need any more articles about it. Unless people are DOING something about it (not talking about it) then miss me with the whole thing. Involving white people in the situation in any form is silly at this point as well.

White people got a 500 year headstart FROM OUR FREE LABOR. And we still got articles talking about inheritance "might" be the reason.
 

Breh13

Smh.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
13,107
Reputation
3,491
Daps
67,336
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
52,277
Reputation
23,138
Daps
245,163
Reppin
St louis
yeah that over 400 year headstart......
:beli:



wat6rr.jpg
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
56,338
Reputation
3,821
Daps
168,685
Article is kinda disingenuous. We have to START somewhere which is why college educated, employed, married, etc. blacks are important. You have to get to the point where you can start handing down wealth generationally. We gotta generate that first before we can hand it down. We can't go from zero to 60 in just one or 2 generations. Cacs already have a massive headstart.

Yep. Owning companies a whole lot different than working for them. As you said, white folk have a massive head start that they seem completely oblivious to. I we are passed reparations. Don't think $ will work. What should happen though is blacks should all get free education. Get subsidies and tax forgiveness in certain areas. Bigger grants for blacks who start businesses. Should also be given csh back on land/property purchases. That to me is how things should work. A pipe dream but US has yet to pay for the sesspool they created
 
Last edited:
Top