00000000000000000000000000034486
Guy you just tried to be smart and you played yourself.Obviously all PAWGs are white. The term means Phat Ass White Girl. Just because all PAWGs are white girls that doesn't mean that all white girls are PAWGs. @RamDam12 is right whenever the subject of ass comes up white girls get graded on some weird curve. All a white girl needs is something that doesn't resemble a straight line and suddenly she's a PAWG. shyt is weird. I get why white boys do it because either they don't know any better or they feel the need to represent their own. But black guys?
I'm calm guy. Go see an optometrist, get some glasses.
@K.G.
I
the spiritthis isn't the thread for the idiosyncrasies of language...but you played yourself breh
You mentioned
"She has a little bit of a bubble but is nowhere near pawg status"
and then next sentence
"ya'll lowering the standards for a white girl"
This is a clear implication that we are "lowering the standards" for Alexa Bliss because "she is a white girl" correct?
Well all pawgs are white girls. (no NOT all white girls are pawgs...I never insinuated that, nor will I)
In essence, standards can't be adjusted (lowered or raised) in a comparison between two like things IF the two like things have the same characteristic. Bliss and Storm both share the "white girl" characteristic. In this comparison if one woman has the "standards lowered" BECAUSE she is a "white girl" and the other woman is a "white girl" as well, then she too benefits from that lowering of standards.
ex:
You can't compare a Ferrari and a Lamborghini and say "you just like the Lamborghini because it's a luxury sports car" because they are BOTH luxuriy sports cars. If one characteristic is common between both items that are being compared, it cannot be used to "prop up" (for lack of a better word) one item over the other.
In turn, Alexa can't have the "standards lowered because she is a white girl" in a comparison for "who is a better pawg" when one of the criteria of being a pawg is "being a white girl" (a characteristic that both women share)
Now, IF this was a comparison between Alexa and Sasha (for example) and if someone said "I like Alexa better...she's a pawg
" then you can say "ya'll lowering the standards for a white girl" because Sasha is not white. Alexa (in this example) is being propped up for being white. But in a comparison between two women who have that same characteristic, it's an invalid argument. Neither Toni Storm nor Alexa Bliss benefits or loses from the "hype" of being a "white girl" in comparison to each other, because it's a characteristic they both share
Last edited:
SpacelySprockets
Veteran
toni storm is an actual pawg, alexa is not
its the same thing with Toni
@K.G.
I
this isn't the thread for the idiosyncrasies of language...but you played yourself breh
You mentioned
"She has a little bit of a bubble but is nowhere near pawg status"
and then next sentence
"ya'll lowering the standards for a white girl"
This is a clear implication that we are "lowering the standards" for Alexa Bliss because "she is a white girl" correct?
Well all pawgs are white girls. (no NOT all white girls are pawgs...I never insinuated that, nor will I)
In essence, standards can't be adjusted (lowered or raised) in a comparison between two like things IF the two like things have the same characteristic. Bliss and Storm both share the "white girl" characteristic. In this comparison if one woman has the "standards lowered" BECAUSE she is a "white girl" and the other woman is a "white girl" as well, then she too benefits from that lowering of standards.
ex:
You can't compare a Ferrari and a Lamborghini and say "you just like the Lamborghini because it's a luxury sports car" because they are BOTH luxuriy sports cars. If one characteristic is common between both items that are being compared, it cannot be used to "prop up" (for lack of a better word) one item over the other.
In turn, Alexa can't have the "standards lowered because she is a white girl" in a comparison for "who is a better pawg" when one of the criteria of being a pawg is "being a white girl" (a characteristic that both women share)
Now, IF this was a comparison between Alexa and Sasha (for example) and if someone said "I like Alexa better...she's a pawg
Neither Toni Storm nor Alexa Bliss benefits or loses from the "hype" of being a "white girl" in comparison to each other, because it's a characteristic they both share
Hold this L. Caress this L. Tell this L you love it and you can't live without it because it's your L.
For starters I never said "she got a little bubble but she's not PAWG status" @RamDam12 said that you're just confused.
You wrote all of that shyt for nothing. 
You even added a gif. 
Because I'm nice and I respect the effort I'll answer your post. Maybe you misunderstood me I'm not saying that Alexa Bliss is getting propped up in this head to head with Toni Storm all you have to do is look at the poll to see she's getting washed. Literally your entire "counter argument" is redundant there and then. 
What I am saying is that Alexa is getting propped up because she's white purely as a result of the fact that she's in a conversation about "Phat Ass White Girls" when she DOES NOT HAVE A FAT ASS. It's as simple as that. If there was a thread here comparing Kiera Hogan/Naomi's asses to Sasha Banks or Alicia Fox NOBODY would be entertaining it but Alexa Bliss v Toni Storm is somehow a conversation? The entire goalposts of having a fat ass have been moved just to accommodate Alexa if that's not grading on a curve I don't know what is. Alexa Bliss shouldn't be figuring in ANY conversation about PAWGs. Now that I'm done with that...
You played yourself twice. You tried so hard and you failed miserably. Just quit whilst you're behind.
Hold this L. Caress this L. Tell this L you love it and you can't live without it because it's your L.
For starters I never said "she got a little bubble but she's not PAWG status" @RamDam12 said that you're just confused.
You played yourself twice. You tried so hard and you failed miserably. Just quit whilst you're behind.
that's it from me breh
cartierhoe
Veteran
At this being a tough decision Storm got way more ass
Norrin Radd
To me, my board!
Seriously
Storm got way more ass
I've never seen a more clear cut choice on here.
AquaCityBoy
Veteran
Dudes dont know what a pawg...white boys pretending to be Black. Trish and Kimberly were the closest thing to that in the last era..prime Dawn Marie...someone like that. Alexa Bliss is just toned up.
The first chick's ass is fake AF and half of them bytches you can't even see their ass.
The Prince of All Saiyans
Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
thread took off
The first chick's ass is fake AF and half of them bytches you can't even see their ass.
He posted 6 pictures and only 2 of them showed ass.
I choose Naomi, Bianca, and Ember.
They didn't turn aroundThe first chick's ass is fake AF and half of them bytches you can't even see their ass.
..half the bytches titties in the game is fake..like Nikki Bella and Steph and u put them on a pedestal.
And are u on coke? Everyone knows Assh Lee has ass galore. Real.
You need Paige Turnah to turn around...one of the most worshipped pawgs in internet history?? Lol