Black Preacher destroys the "Gay is the New Black" argument

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
So you promoting adultery or adoption? Either way, homosexuals can't procreate. Which is why i responded dumby, my grandchildren won't be ashamed of my stance because they'll be ALIVE.

Again, raising kids has nothing to do with being married, nor has it ever and is a different issue.



And why should they see the same tax benefits when the probability of them having families isn't even remotely equal? Isn't that what the tax breaks are for? Households not just unions.

Because single households get tax breaks if you're married. More if you have kids. Thats how the law has always worked.

Even further, the ability to have medical emergency access to a spouse, the ability to settle inheritances, and transfer property are additional benefits of "marriage"

Marriage isn't a religious concept, its a legal contract recognized by the state.
 

Real N Quotes

East Is In The House OMG
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
8,997
Reputation
-1,286
Daps
15,600
the homosexual agenda is about one thing...our children...they want our kids brehs
Gay marriage yields no children or grand children, enjoy the dead end of your DNA strands

full
 

Prodigital

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
3,503
Reputation
342
Daps
7,789
Reppin
NULL
Because single households get tax breaks if you're married. More if you have kids. Thats how the law has always worked.

Even further, the ability to have medical emergency access to a spouse, the ability to settle inheritances, and transfer property are additional benefits of "marriage"

Marriage isn't a religious concept, its a legal contract recognized by the state.
I'd rather see civil unions get elevated rights instead of removing sanctity of marriage, which at its core promotes procreation. I never denied its state given benefits, but the reasoning behind it has everything to do with continuance of humanity.

Regardless, dudes points about gay rights are pretty spot on. If you have to announce you self in order to be discriminated its not on the same plateau of civil rights, which are inherit
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,950
Daps
25,304
Don't play games with me.

Whats your beef with gays existing?

Lets get to the root of it.
Not playing games

My answer to the question does nothing if you dnt provide proper basis on what you define as "inherently wrong" based on your worldview

The constructs of my own worldview provide different guidelines on determining right and wrong and to asnwer your question I would need more specifics before all we rlly do is get into another senseless broad clash of worldview vs worldview
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
I'd rather see civil unions get elevated rights instead of removing sanctity of marriage, which at its core promotes procreation. I never denied its state given benefits, but the reasoning behind it has everything to do with continuance of humanity.

Thats legal redundancy. If its the same law, call it the same thing. Christian fundies just don't like to share, which isn't news to anyone

There are MILLIONS who can't reproduce, should they be allowed to get married?

Regardless, dudes points about gay rights are pretty spot on. If you have to announce you self in order to be discriminated its not on the same plateau of civil rights, which are inherit

And his points aren't valid in any sense. Yeah, gays have an agenda...you're damn right they do. Until 2003, it wasn't even possible for them to have consensual sex in half the country. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

All h'es using is the bible to say "well XYZ is wrong"....dawg who gives a fukk?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
Not playing games

My answer to the question does nothing if you dnt provide proper basis on what you define as "inherently wrong" based on your worldview

The constructs of my own worldview provide different guidelines on determining right and wrong and to asnwer your question I would need more specifics before all we rlly do is get into another senseless broad clash of worldview vs worldview

You didn't answer the question.

What do you have against gay?

Comparing worldviews is a way for you to side step the argument and doesn't address what was posed to you.
 
Top