Black man in KC charged with 2nd degree murder for shooting/killing woman that was stealing his car

A

Astroslik

Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
28,479
Reputation
2,844
Daps
85,379
SourPowerStraws said:
Btw i believe self defense should only be for people in danger meaning that you are in a life death situation.


Someone entering your property shouldn’t give anyone a right to kill unless they are in there for the intent to harm.
Click to expand...
Most people who do kick doors have an intent to harm.

My aunt would be dead if my cousin didnt shoot some stupid nikka who kicked down her door while he was at her crib. Some of us have life experiences that are damn near PTSD level.

A couple dudes broke into our shyt growing up and threatened her with a gun. We had to quickly move because that shyt scarred my mother.

I'm blowing shyt down if you enter my crib. its non negotiable :manny:
 
MeachTheMonster

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Hall of Shame
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,521
Reputation
3,794
Daps
109,498
Reppin
Tha Land
David_TheMan said:
He was arrested and he is being charged.
If he has a good defense lawyer he should be able to get out of this.

Missouri Revisor of Statutes - Revised Statutes of Missouri, RSMo Chapter 563

563.031. Use of force in defense of persons. — 1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person, unless:

  (1) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case his or her use of force is nevertheless justifiable provided:

  (a) He or she has withdrawn from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened use of unlawful force; or

  (b) He or she is a law enforcement officer and as such is an aggressor pursuant to section 563.046; or

  (c) The aggressor is justified under some other provision of this chapter or other provision of law;

  (2) Under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the person whom he or she seeks to protect would not be justified in using such protective force;

  (3) The actor was attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of a forcible felony.

  2. A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless:

  (1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;

  (2) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person; or

  (3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section.

  3. A person does not have a duty to retreat:

  (1) From a dwelling, residence, or vehicle where the person is not unlawfully entering or unlawfully remaining;

  (2) From private property that is owned or leased by such individual; or

  (3) If the person is in any other location such person has the right to be.

  4. The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of physical restraint as protective force provided that the actor takes all reasonable measures to terminate the restraint as soon as it is reasonable to do so.

  5. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of justification under this section. If a defendant asserts that his or her use of force is described under subdivision (2) of subsection 2 of this section, the burden shall then be on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not reasonably believe that the use of such force was necessary to defend against what he or she reasonably believed was the use or imminent use of unlawful force.

--------
563.041. Use of physical force in defense of property. — 1. A person may, subject to the limitations of subsection 2, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what he or she reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by such person of stealing, property damage or tampering in any degree.

  2. A person may use deadly force under circumstances described in subsection 1 only when such use of deadly force is authorized under other sections of this chapter.

  3. The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of physical restraint as protective force provided that the actor takes all reasonable measures to terminate the restraint as soon as it is reasonable to do so.

----

The only person wrong is the thief, and quite frankly thieves deserve to die.
Click to expand...
Sure they will argue over this in court. They have video. If he shot her as she was driving away. He’s going to jail :manny:
 
Fatboi1

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,629
Reputation
7,970
Daps
111,049
hex said:
You sound fukking retarded.

Of course it matters. I'm :dead: at "hood monster". Yeah, ok. What the fukk hood are you from where you don't know a cop shooting someone ain't the same as a black man shooting someone?

@Fatboi1 come take this dude back to The Arcadium.

Fred.
Click to expand...
Man I just got up from a nap and saw the thread title.

:mjlol:








:snooze:
 
  • Dap
Reactions: hex
V

Vinny Lupton

Superstar
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
15,864
Reputation
2,990
Daps
49,016
Wildin said:
Do y'all even own guns?

Do you know how hard it is to hit a moving target?

Especially with a pistol?

This shyt ain't the movies. "Why didn't they just shoot the knife or the gun out of his hand?"
Click to expand...
I can shoot you from here
 
You Win Perfect

You Win Perfect

bow down
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
14,993
Reputation
-1,969
Daps
39,297
hex said:
You sound fukking retarded.

Of course it matters. I'm :dead: at "hood monster". Yeah, ok. What the fukk hood are you from where you don't know a cop shooting someone ain't the same as a black man shooting someone?

@Fatboi1 come take this dude back to The Arcadium.

Fred.
Click to expand...
The coli is full of losers man shyt is ridiculous. Their hate for black men has no bounds
 
  • Dap
Reactions: hex
You Win Perfect

You Win Perfect

bow down
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
14,993
Reputation
-1,969
Daps
39,297
Wildin said:
Do y'all even own guns?

Do you know how hard it is to hit a moving target?

Especially with a pistol?

This shyt ain't the movies. "Why didn't they just shoot the knife or the gun out of his hand?"
Click to expand...
Lmao ayo I can’t believe these bums in here.
They never been in a fist fight let alone having to fire a gun
 
Another Man

Another Man

Trappin w/ Benzino
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,783
Reputation
9,106
Daps
126,696
Reppin
Red Roof Inn
SourPowerStraws said:
The people I love are still alive till this very day and we’ve lived in a strict gun law state/city our entire lives.


Negged
Click to expand...
And you live in a bubble of blissful ignorance and false security due to such. It's easy to try and tell others how they should handle shyt you've never had to face. You're a p*ssy, and will be a victim if invaded, don't try to tell others what to do because you clearly don't live in reality. They call shyt getting real "getting REAL" for a good reason.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top