Black man in KC charged with 2nd degree murder for shooting/killing woman that was stealing his car

[8WON6]

https://www.kctv5.com/news/local_ne...cle_76cbdcc6-8355-11ea-bbdd-1ba77af3fecc.html

KANSAS CITY, MO (KCTV) - A Kansas City man who earlier this month fired multiple shots at a woman who was driving off in his vehicle has been charged.

26-year-old Lawrence Perkins faces second degree murder, armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon.


According to court records, Kansas City police were dispatched to the area of 59th and Troost Avenue on a reported shooting.


When they arrived at the location, they found the deceased victim sitting inside a vehicle. The defendant told police he fired multiple shots at the victim after she began to drive off in his vehicle.

Surveillance video showed the defendant firing multiple times as the victim attempted to flee after taking his vehicle. Police found 10 .45 caliber shell casings at the scene.

Prosecutors requested a bond of $100,000.

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

Is she

free the guy

 

[Steel]

Technically you can’t shoot people who are running away

but fukk it I’ll allow it

Free Him

 

[Astroslik]

Free him

 

[8WON6]

A latino bytch.

 

[Warren Moon]

He’ll probably plead down.

any responsible gun owner, know that once the culprit is running or driving away; u have to stop shooting at them.

fukked up law, but it is the law.

 

[Clay Puppington]

I'd put $$$ on his books

 

[MeachTheMonster]

He shouldn’t have shot her.

She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.

He deserves the murder charge

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Judging from what I see online women often hate it when a man kills a women in self defense

 

[NinoBrown]

She probably was an illegal....one less mami to deal with.....

Free that man!

 

[UberEatsDriver]

Btw i believe self defense should only be for people in danger meaning that you are in a life death situation.


Someone entering your property shouldn’t give anyone a right to kill unless they are in there for the intent to harm.

 

[xCivicx]

He shouldn’t have shot her.

She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.

He deserves the murder charge

Negged fukkboi

 

[8WON6]

He shouldn’t have shot her.

She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.

He deserves the murder charge

you're correct about what the word of the law is, but I feel like a car should be treated differently. For many people your car is how you get to work, it's an integral part of how you make a living. Yes it can be replaced, but it's not like it's just an ipod.

 

[NinoBrown]

He shouldn’t have shot her.

She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.

He deserves the murder charge

Btw i believe self defense should only be for people in danger meaning that you are in a life death situation.


Someone entering your property shouldn’t give anyone a right to kill unless they are in there for the intent to harm.

Naw, it is reasonable, someone violates....they have to go....she should have gone to school instead of trying to rob a Black man....

Too bad....it is a hot girl summer for her if she didn't say her prayers lol

 

[The M.I.C.]

Troost Ave?

Still going down in good ole Kansas City, KS.