Biracial Jewish Chick claims blacks aren't educated enough on why antisemitism is wrong

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,821
Reputation
734
Daps
6,267
Nick was being anti Semitic

Like most people who argue over this, you barely have any education on this topic.

"The majority of haplotypes in Soqotra belong to haplogroup J (85.7%)“
~Viktor Černý
Out of Arabia—The Settlement of Island Soqotra as Revealed by Mitochondrial and Y ChromosomeGenetic Diversity

Soqotra people:



Socotra.info

drums_20.JPG


drums_2.JPG



9221818cb0793d39cd48111beb5445c3.jpg



Semitic slave figurine can be see in Israel, Hecht Museum.

6cc53fa86611fdc77b98a9663cc60758--haifa-figurine.jpg


קובץ:Figurine from Egypt of semitic slave.jpg – ויקיפדיה

Here is an ancient Semite from Qaryat al-Faw, Saudi Arabia, 1st to 2nd century CE.

05-Fragment-of-a-wall-painting-with-a-mans-head.jpg


Roads of Arabia: Archaeology and History of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia | artBahrain.org


3896a.jpg


Head of a Syrian
KhM 3896a
TILE; RAMESSES III/USERMAATRE-MERIAMUN

1186–1155 BC

The Global Egyptian Museum | 3896a


3896b.jpg


Head of a Beduin from Syria
KhM 3896b
TILE; RAMESSES III/USERMAATRE-MERIAMUN


1186–1155 BC

The Global Egyptian Museum | 3896b


3896c.jpg


Head of a Beduin from Syria
KhM 3896c
TILE; NEW KINGDOM


c. 1550 BC – c. 1077 BC

The Global Egyptian Museum | 3896c



"Our statistical tests of alternative Semitic histories support an initial divergence of Akkadian from ancestral Semitic over competing hypotheses (e.g. an African origin of Semitic). We estimate an Early Bronze Age origin for Semitic approximately 5750 years ago in the Levant, and further propose that contemporary Ethiosemitic languages of Africa reflect a single introduction of early Ethiosemitic from southern Arabia approximately 2800 years ago.

[…]

Semitic languages (Akkadian, Aramaic, Ge'ez, ancient Hebrew and Ugaritic) combined with archaeological evidence for the sampling dates of the epigraphic data (the time at which the materials were inscribed).

iu



"These results indicate that the ancestor of all Semitic languages in our dataset was being spoken in the Near East no earlier than approximately 7400 YBP, after having after having diverged from Afroasiatic in Africa"

(i) Semitic had an Early Bronze Age origin (approx. 5750 YBP) in the Levant, followed by an expansion of Akkadian into Mesopotamia;

(ii) Central and South Semitic diverged earlier than previously thought throughout the Levant during the Early to Middle Bronze Age transition; and

(iii) Ethiosemitic arose as the result of a single, possibly pre-Aksumite, introduction of a lineage from southern Arabia to the Horn of Africa approximately 2800 YBP.
[/QUOTE]~Andrew Kitchen, Christopher Ehret2, Shiferaw Assefa2 and Connie J. Mulligan
Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East
Proc. R. Soc. B (2009) 276, 2703–2710
doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0408


402px-Kingdoms_of_Israel_and_Judah_map_830.svg.png


Siege of Lachish Reliefs at the British Museum

OSA_5897-840x560.jpg


OSA_5892-840x560.jpg




"Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king. There are some who say that a motley collection of landless Assyrians occupied a part of Egypt, and then built cities of their own, inhabiting the lands of the Hebrews and the nearer parts of Syria. Others again find a famous ancestry for the Jews in the Solymi who are mentioned with respect in the epics of Homer: this tribe is supposed to have founded Jerusalem (4) and named it after themselves."
~Cornelius Tacitus (AD 55 - 117), The Histories by Cornelius Tacitus.


"The haplotypes for the Tomb of the Shroud individuals are commonly distributed throughout the North of Africa and the Middle East through to Eastern Europe.
[…]
A recent hypothesis [45] suggests that leprosy may have first appeared in the region not with Alexander but sometime earlier (circa 400 B.C.E or later), with diseased young slaves conveyed from India to Egypt on cargo ships. More recently a review of the origins and spread of leprosy has identified an East African origin with various routes of migration out of Africa into the Middle East and beyond [46].

image


image

~Carney D. Matheson et al.
Molecular Exploration of the First-Century Tomb of the Shroud in Akeldama, Jerusalem



"Dr Pawel Wolf gave the MBI Al Jaber Public Lecture at the British Museum this year as part of the annual Seminar for Arabia Studies. The lecture was entitled 'Colonisation or Culture Transfer? The Almaqah temple of Wuqro (Tigray) sheds new light on Ethio-Sabaean culture contacts in the Northern Horn of Africa' and gave an insight into the fascinating work of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) over the past few seasons.

Addi Akaweh, 2000 m above sea level, is in a region of Tigray which has not yet been explored for archaeological material. In the north of the Abyssinian highlands, the region is about 50 km north of the provincial capital of Mekelle, and seems to have been of importance due to its proximity to the ancient trade routes southeast of the main ancient centres of Axum and Yeha.

The temple of the Sabaean God Almaqah is one of the main archaeological discoveries of the area, though there are signs of an ancient settlement nearby and some building believed to have a sacred use at nearby Ziban Adi. They belong to a settlement area of the 1st millennium BC, a period of crucial social development in the Abyssinian highlands.

Since the Neolithic period, the Abyssinian highlands were part of a far-flung network of exchange relationships between North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, and both African and South Arabian cultural components can be seen in its development. South Arabian inscriptions, temples and sculptures from the early 1st millennium BC, have been found at Yeha and Hawlti.

Various models of social development have been applied to explain the strong South Arabian presence such as colonization or economic and cultural relations. More research and work needs to be carried out before the contacts can be properly understood.

The primary objective of the work of the DAI in Addi Akaweh is to comprehensively record and explore the archaeological material to shed light on the local cultural transformation in the context of regional contacts. Intercultural contacts and external relations with neighbouring cultural areas such as South Arabia, the Nile Valley and the south are still unexplored, and need to be investigated cross-regionally.

The Almaqah temple offers the ideal opportunity for the study of specific religious cultural components. The reconstruction of spatial concepts, ritual procedures and votive practices sheds light on the sacral-political space of the regional elite. The temple was built in the 8th to 6th centuries BC on the ruins of an earlier building and continued in use with several modifications to probably the 3rd century BC. It resembles the early South Arabian religious buildings in form and is built from local stone. Some of its most important features are a betyl made from naturally rounded boulders and perfectly preserved and libation altar donated by a hitherto unknown king named W'RN. His dedicatory inscription proves the ancient name of Yeha for the first time and demonstrates its importance as a national religious and political centre. It also shows that elements of royal elite cultural and ideological traditions of South Arabia and the African region are used together. C14 dating confirmed the Ethiopian Sabaean inscriptions to date to the 7th century BC.
~Carolyn PerryJuly 26, 2012
The Sabaean Temple of Almaqah in Addi Akaweh (Tigray), Ethiopia


Chaldean soldiers are depicted with Hebrew captives in the 11th Century Bristol Psalter

Chaldean_soldiers_with_Hebrew_captives.jpg


University of Cambridge
Chaldean Soldiers with Hebrew Captives | Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,459
Reputation
-19,914
Daps
75,526
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
I assume you mean Farrakhan. Anyway, what does Farrakhan teach that you say people should stay away from?


LETS PULL UP SOME OF HIS CLASSIC QUOTES:

- “You see everybody always talk about Hitler exterminating six million Jews. That’s right. But don’t nobody ever ask what did they do to Hitler.”

-“They call Hezbollah terrorists, I call them freedom fighters.”

-“Here, the Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call him Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man.”

-“The die is set and Malcolm shall not escape. Such a man is worthy of death.”





ITS HONESTLY INCREDIBLE THAT SO MANY PEOPLE CONSIDER THIS MAN “HONORABLE” .. IT MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,097
Reputation
11,347
Daps
198,929
Reppin
Lamb of God
I am high-key disgusted that she's okay with generalizing Black people, in particular men in particular but extremely disgusted when she doesn't have that same view for Black people generalizing white Jews and is high-key disgusting with Blacks in particular even using terms like Black supremacy. These biracials are very dangerous.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
77,097
Reputation
11,347
Daps
198,929
Reppin
Lamb of God
It's like people don't realize they are white :why:
if some one loses their life over being a religious minority or something like that it's a shame and i don't condone that
but i'm not about to cape for a white demographic because they involved in intra-cac discrimination
imagine caping for some fukking italians in 1920 or some shyt. yall got that

Far as i'm concerned black ppl can talk shyt about any white demographic especially as it pertains to that groups interaction with BLACK PEOPLE. If that group is displayed in a negative light as a result of that then so be it. I'm really getting tired of this woke shyt flipping everything onto black men
There are technically a lot more Black Jews than white ones but most Black ones have been removed of the title due to white supremacy wanting to lock everyone Black under the African mantra to force global oppression on us due to our skin color. Regardless if you believe it or not, outside of intermarriage, a lot of white Jews were once Black. They are far removed but they aren't THAT far removed. The only ones with claims to very limited Blackness are the ones like @Sccit who are Sephardic and even they were Black 2000 years ago regardless of what his c00n ass says now. The removal of their Blackness was due to war and massive ethnic genocides more than anything else.
 

Jekyll

Superstar
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
7,645
Reputation
839
Daps
33,011
Reppin
NULL
:picard: How do nikkas be so poorly informed?? And loud???

1. There have been Jews in the south since before the revolution, moving significant weight, slave trading, plantation owning...

Ie, https://www.thecoli.com/posts/38358776/

2. Jewish presence partially explains Atlanta's post civil war prosperity.

Despite this economic blow, Atlanta and its Jewish community soon reemerged from the ashes of the city’s destruction as the Gate City became an economic center of the “New South.” It did not take Atlanta long to rebound from the war. In 1865, the city had 150 stores; by 1869 it had 875 stores. While $3 million worth of goods had been sold in Atlanta in 1859, this annual figure had risen to $35 million by 1872. By 1873, there were five different railroad lines in the city. A growing number of Jews settled in Atlanta seeking to take advantage of this remarkable growth. Their presence was hailed by civic boosters. One local newspaper declared in 1875, “nothing is so indicative of a city’s progress as to see an influx of Jews…because they are thrifty and progressive people who never fail to build up a town they settle in.”

According to the historian Steven Hertzberg, in 1880, 71% of adult Jewish men in Atlanta worked in commercial trade; 60% were either business owners or managers

ISJL - Georgia Atlanta Encyclopedia

3. The Jewish community in Atlanta has been growing CRAZY for the past few decades. Y'all have fukking holocaust memorials, more than one.

Whereas much of the Atlanta Jewish community has historically been deeply rooted families that prided in their Atlanta and Southern ties, the vast majority of the community today is made up of transplants, and almost a third of the community was born in New York. According to the 2006 population survey, Jews who have moved to the area in the last 10 years also outnumber those born in the area, particularly in the northern suburbs.[2]

Today there are 38 synagogues in the area – 33 founded after 1968, of which 24 were started between 1984 and 2006

There are also Holocaust memorials in Greenwood Cemetery and at the Marcus JCC's Zaban Park. The Marcus JCC is named in honor of Bernie Marcus, who along with Arthur Blank founded Home Depot, and both of whom are major donors in the Jewish community in Atlanta and beyond

History of the Jews in Atlanta - Wikipedia

4. Lastly and most importantly, how do you not know about the Leo Frank trial and lynching? :what: shyt is famous! Like, wtf??? Wiki is available to all, use it. :what:


Leo Frank - Wikipedia


And this is why i have to take time out of my evening to include detailed spoilers and footnotes, because nikkas legit don't know shyt, but be loud af. :what:


Edit: :snoop: i had to come back. Leo Frank is why the Klan was constructed at stone mountain. We just talked about this! :what:


Man fukk all that. I said what I said. These bytches talking about 38 synagogues in the area but that could be all the way up 400 with how the “atlanta metro area” works:stopitslime:


I stand on it. I stay smack dab in da middle of the actual city of Atlanta and have never seen a synagogue and could probably count on 1 hand the amount of times I’ve seen somebody that was obviously Jewish.

And I bet for sure aint none of that shyt in the rest of GA.
 

Breh13

Smh.
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
13,249
Reputation
3,506
Daps
67,963
There’s this indigenous expectation that black people must love and respect everyone while being hated and disrespected by everyone. Can’t get jiggy with that.
Fr.

Everyone expects you to be a soft tip-toeing nikka. Any bit of rightful indignation and all hell breaks loose.

Martin Luther was the most hated person in his time, decades later they are trying to whitewash him and attack you with altered history.

This world is some BS.
 

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,821
Reputation
734
Daps
6,267
LETS PULL UP SOME OF HIS CLASSIC QUOTES:

- “You see everybody always talk about Hitler exterminating six million Jews. That’s right. But don’t nobody ever ask what did they do to Hitler.”

-“They call Hezbollah terrorists, I call them freedom fighters.”

-“Here, the Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call him Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man.”

-“The die is set and Malcolm shall not escape. Such a man is worthy of death.”

ITS HONESTLY INCREDIBLE THAT SO MANY PEOPLE CONSIDER THIS MAN “HONORABLE” .. IT MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.

Most of these things you've stated here are not even true. I've always listened to what he has said, to make sure it's correct. Most of it is taken out of context, or given a spin. There is Jewish people who say that Jewish people have done wrong to the Black community. But when Farrakhan says it, it's a problem. It makes no sense to ignore documented history. Farrakhan is not accusing each and every Jewish person. He always was clear about that.

The whole hitler thing wasn't even started by him. He was called that, while he has not such history. He didn't say that he respected hitler for what he had done, he said that hitler was great in his leadership. The whole hitler comparison that was done in the first place was unnecessary, because he never called for Jewish people to be harmed let alone exterminated. Convert or not.

There are many people who advocates for Palestinians and against the mistreatment. The way they have been treated is has been horrible since Churchill set up the State of Israel, where Palestinians have been forced out of their houses. Obviously there is going to be a conflict. And each time agreements are being rejected and more settlements are being built.

Many Palestinians came for the Judaic fait, but were "forced into Islam". Jews always have been there living in peace side-by-side with muslims. And yes I do understand the problem with the AL Aqsa and Temple of Solomon.

DNA from the Bible's Canaanites lives on in modern Arabs and Jews

On multiple occasions Farrakhan also stated that he is pro-Israel and wasn't to help in the process of peace. He stated that the Arabic world needs to accept the existence of Israel as a state. He wants to see a healthy relationship, where both groups can live in peace the way it was before the Churchill and UN insertion. I have heard him say this on multiple occasions. I know the controlled media is twisting his words and propagates against him.

Malcom's death is not on the NOI or Farrakhan, but the government. This is documented.

Lastly, Farrakhan is critical about all types of injustices that is going on. He also has been critical about Blacks who are either religious or not. And it's not that I listen to him each and everyday, but from time to time I will. Especially the big events, when the media is posting about it.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,459
Reputation
-19,914
Daps
75,526
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Most of these things you've stated here are not even true. I've always listened to what he has said, to make sure it's correct. Most of it is taken out of context, or given a spin. There is Jewish people who say that Jewish people have done wrong to the Black community. But when Farrakhan says it, it's a problem. It makes no sense to ignore documented history. Farrakhan is not accusing each and every Jewish person. He always was clear about that.

The whole hitler thing wasn't even started by him. He was called that, while he has not such history. He didn't say that he respected hitler for what he had done, he said that hitler was great in his leadership. The whole hitler comparison that was done in the first place was unnecessary, because he never called for Jewish people to be harmed let alone exterminated. Convert or not.

There are many people who advocates for Palestinians and against the mistreatment. The way they have been treated is has been horrible since Churchill set up the State of Israel, where Palestinians have been forced out of their houses. Obviously there is going to be a conflict. And each time agreements are being rejected and more settlements are being built.

Many Palestinians came for the Judaic fait, but were "forced into Islam". Jews always have been there living in peace side-by-side with muslims. And yes I do understand the problem with the AL Aqsa and Temple of Solomon.

DNA from the Bible's Canaanites lives on in modern Arabs and Jews

On multiple occasions Farrakhan also stated that he is pro-Israel and wasn't to help in the process of peace. He stated that the Arabic world needs to accept the existence of Israel as a state. He wants to see a healthy relationship, where both groups can live in peace the way it was before the Churchill and UN insertion. I have heard him say this on multiple occasions. I know the controlled media is twisting his words and propagates against him.

Malcom's death is not on the NOI or Farrakhan, but the government. This is documented.

Lastly, Farrakhan is critical about all types of injustices that is going on. He also has been critical about Blacks who are either religious or not. And it's not that I listen to him each and everyday, but from time to time I will. Especially the big events, when the media is posting about it.



SOUNDS LIKE YOURE GIVING HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
 
Last edited:

Ish Gibor

Omnipresence
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
4,821
Reputation
734
Daps
6,267
SOUNDS LIKE YOURE GIVING HIM THE BEFIT OF THE DOUBT
I am giving him an objective point of view, the way I do with everybody. I know how the media plays games. I actually listened to what he said, by the words that came out his own mouth. Not what later was published and taken out of context. He was criticized for speaking on Semites, while you yourself admitted that people like the Yemeni Socotra are indeed Semites.

You go by quotes, quoted by quotes from quotes.






 
Last edited:
Top