I was banned because I wouldn't stop asking the site owner why an obvious paid shill like Nap is apparently exempt from the rules. The ad hoc justification afterwards was for having aliases, which was not a problem previously.
Damn you are mad as shyt. This is not Higher Learning at all. I thought this was a facts and no-nonsense section. TLR has you spiraling out BADLY. Stick to what you know, going forward.
I was banned … The ad hoc justification afterwards was for having aliases, which was not a problem previously.
are people really still trying to defend this nikka I dont get it.
Because the evidence was flimsy and not worthy of a conviction. Best they could hope for was a civil judgment which was all the “victim” really wanted all along.Facts. The guy is a piece of shyt but it is what it is, as far as legal terms, deals., etc
Everyone is too busy outrage over Cosby's actions (as they should). However, why is the media & Twitter verse not focused on why Cosby got this deal in first place? Why does the legal system allow shady people to get off this easy? In particular those with paper and power.
That's not a problem when the defendant isn't rich.Because the evidence was flimsy and not worthy of a conviction.
“victim”