Best documentary about Egypt plus confirmation about black Egyptians

invalid

Banned
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
19,972
Reputation
6,797
Daps
80,751
I’ve only lightly skipped through but watched the part discussing Diop and the melanin concentration of the mummies of Tuthmose II, Seti I, and Rameses II

What I know for sure is that Seti I and his son Rameses II were of Nubian descent.

Seti was the son of Pa Rameses, the founder of the 19th Dynasty.

Pa Rameses father was also named Seti, who was a courtier during the reigns of Akhenaten, Tutankhamen, Aye, and Horemheb, the last kings of the 18th Dynasty.

Here is a snippet of Seti’s ancestry.

Seti, the forefather of the 19th Dynasty, was from a military family in the Nile Delta. According to one theory he is identical with a royal envoy mentioned in the Amarna letters as Shuta.[1] His brother Khaemwaset is probably identical with the Royal Fanbearer and Chief of the Bowmen of Kush Khaemwaset, who is mentioned on a statue dating to Tutankhamun's reign. Khaemwaset's wife Taemwadjsy was mistress of the Harem of Amun and is probably the same Taemwadjsy who was sister to Huy, Viceroy of Kush.[2] So Seti was the member of a very prominent family, and after his son Paramessu (Ramesses I) was chosen by Pharaoh Horemheb as his successor, Seti's descendants went on to form one of the most powerful dynasties of Egypt.

So Seti’s brother was Chief of the Bowman of Kush (Nubia). And his brother’s wife was the sister to Huy, the Viceroy of Kush (Nubia) during the reign of Tutankhamen.

The Viceroys of Kush were the rulers of Nubia who reported to the Pharaoh under Egyptian occupation.

The former Kingdom of Kerma in Nubia, was a province of ancient Egypt from the 16th century BCE to eleventh century BCE. During this period, the polity was ruled by a viceroy who reported directly to the Egyptian Pharaoh.

This fresco is taken from the tomb of Huy, the Viceroy of Kush during the reign of Tutankhamen.

M0418c.jpg


M0418c-33.jpg


The 25th Dynasty, which consisted of the Nubian Kings that ruled over Egypt, were the descendants of these Viceroys.

It is believed that the Egyptian 25th Dynasty were descendants of these viceroys, and so were the dynasties that ruled independent Kush until the fourth century CE.[citation ne

But what they fail to mention is that the Ramessid Family (19th Dynasty) and therefore Ramesses II (considered to be the greatest Egyptian Pharaoh) were descendants of Nubians as well.

As for Tuthmose II, a predecessor of Tutankhamen, they traced their genetics and found that it originated around the Great Lakes region in Central Africa, which is the source of the Nile. Which lends to the most logical explanation of the origins of the Ancient Egyptians, being that of a group of people from the Great Lakes region, who migrated down the Nile to the Delta that empties into the Mediterranean.
 
Last edited:

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
46,188
Reputation
12,574
Daps
188,510
Reppin
....
They didn't use them to melt granite. They used stone hammers which are found at ALL the quarry and building sites to cut and shape the blocks.

Nothing surprising about my reaction.​
You need to watch it though. It puts that theory to rest.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
19,163
Reputation
6,675
Daps
75,627
Reppin
Occulonimbus edoequus
They didn't use them to melt granite. They used stone hammers which are found at ALL the quarry and building sites to cut and shape the blocks.

Nothing surprising about my reaction.​
27:29 of your own example reinforces the fact and reality that the pyramids are 80% soft sandstone and limestone, which makes it plausible that they could cast those.

It's true that that cut most of the granite...but only a fraction of the whole work involved.


At least you're not saying aliens did it.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: TEH

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,475
Reputation
8,079
Daps
121,074
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
27:29 of your own example reinforces the fact and reality that the pyramids are 80% soft sandstone and limestone, which makes it plausible that they could cast those.

It's true that that cut most of the granite...but only a fraction of the whole work involved.

'Casting' /= Cut granite.

Archaeologists already showed some of the soft rocks were cast while the vast majority were quarried a couple hundred yards from the building sites.​
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,656
Reputation
7,248
Daps
129,290
Isn’t the “redheadedness” on the mummies actually like residue and liquids from embalming as well?
 
Top