For me it’s the performance. On the real, unless any of us actually know these people personally, we can’t say how close someone is or isn’t to the real life thing. I never met Malcom or Lamotta, but I believe Denzel and Robert became those people for hours on end and did dope work as a result. That’s really the only way we can do it.
Now if someone does a movie based on a friend of mine or a relative, I can judge that more acutely and have a better grasp. But even if someone 20 years from now does a biopic on The Rock, none of us here will ever really know how close that person came to becoming Dwayne Johnson. We only know of the man what he chooses to show
I respectfully agree with some points
And I respectfully disagree with others.
When there hours of footage and interviews or etc where can get enough just to gauge who this person is or what kind of person he generally is..... I don’t think to a degree you have to had sat with them over a few coffees or lunch to know them.
No one is really trynna look deep in anyone’s hearts and I don’t think these movies try to accomplish that.
We look for mannerisms, cadence, ticks, do they move or talk like said real person (which with footage we can clearly compare).
Basically we looking for someone that’s mastered how to “mimic” them.
How close do they look like said person.
I think those are valid.
I’ve seen enough of Ray or Steve Jobs or even recently The Rock over the years.
So we can tell how well someone “mimicked” them.
We’ve never saw George Washington, Lincoln, or etc real figure that’s been dead for centuries and the guys that portray them just have to do they best they can and add their own shyt.
Martha