chase wasnt open on the play
he maybe wouldve drew a holding penalty tho
Huh? 29 was chopping his feet right as Chase started to break away, Joe floats it over the middle and that's game lol
Bengals @Ravens TNF
- Thread starter Black White Sox Hat
- Start date
Huh? 29 was chopping his feet right as Chase started to break away, Joe floats it over the middle and that's game lol
Dr. Narcisse
Veteran
Relax breh they were right there
Lil Bape the PostGod
Can’t talk to broke boys
Never throw to a cac receiver with the game on the line
Some of them are. Hypocrites exist
OBVIOUSLY ALL THE PPL
WHO WERE TELLING THE BENGALS
TO GO FOR 2 ARE THE SAME PPL
WHO WANTED TAMPA TO GO FOR 2
he said they could only lose 2. strike one
NAH I NEED RECEIPTS
And it wasn't like the Ravens were driving up and down the field all 2nd half on them and they couldn't stop them.
The fumble gave them a short field for a score.
Poor tackling on an out route went for 86 yards.
I swear these coaches get into their own heads and thinking going for it means "we were trying to win it"..
gtj1982
Superstar
Nah they lost after a LJ fumble and their coach not letting Burrow cook with the ball and overtime and putting the game in the hands of the kicker.
not that dumb a decisionWhat a dumb decision to go for two.
This game was coming down to your defense being able to stop Lamar from getting into FG range whether you made the 2 or not. Why make it about whether your offense can convert a 2 too??
Edit: to be clear, I’d be ok with the 2 if there was only a few seconds left on the clock. But with :38 seconds left, stopping Lamar is the already low probability task, why add a less than 100% success probability task for such little gain? It was an objectively terrible decision.
pretty sure baltimore scored on four straight drives lol. fukk overtime. go for the win now
it was somewhat common for road teams to go for 2 in this scenario
not a big deal. the true fukk up was not kicking the field goal up 21-20
i think the db wouldve just got called for dpi or holding
The point is this.
The Ravens were moving the ball four straight drives which is why the Bengals likely went for it. They didn't want to chance it in O.T.
However, even IF the Bengals converted a two point conversion there, the Ravens still had 35 second and two timeouts to get into FG range to WIN the game in regulation. It just makes very little sense in that situation. If there were ten seconds and no timeouts, I get it as there is a very small chance the Ravens would get a FG or a Hail Mary if they tried it. However, 35 seconds and two timeouts with a QB that can turn nothing into something is a lot of time.
Dumb decision.
