You sure do like wallowing in the mud of dumb to protect your ignorance, don't you?
It's transparent in the numbers that it took from an anti-trans group; a group that asked its lesbian followers [anti-trans people] through social media about their experiences, likely with leading questions. Does it need to be spelled out to you that the lack of credibility puts holes in the ship of its position that has already sunk to the sea floor?
Why are you framing this as if the scope isn't damming trans people through the means of disinformation? Forget that it's about trans people for a second, because it seems you can't see the forest for the trees, can you not see that there's no grounds to stand by your position when it's built on deception? All this shyt that you're trying to insert into the argument can't theoretically exist before you acknowledge so.
Funny how this post was ignored.
Let me get this straight:
The author used a lesbian [anti-trans foundation] questionnaire
and used the account of a lesbian porn star, who's a serial rapist, as sources for her hit-piece about the alleged predatory behavior of trans people on lesbians.
You can't make this shyt up. These lesbians have hoodwinked all y'all mfers.
@Umoja
The problem with people like you is you're dishonest and not as smart as you think.
You want to go down the path of discrediting something based on the pioneer?
Let us talk about John Money. Ruined the life of his test subject and falsified results to keep his theory on gender being a social construct going. What was he also known for, trying to distinguish the affectionate and malicious abuse of children
Pretty sure one psychiatrist, his name escapes me, kept photographs of his subjects, children, kn sexual positions
Do you think the entire subject should be scrapped because some the pioneers are pedo? Do you think people would be wrong to question what the end goal is based on the deviants who got the ball rolling?
You played yourself. The fact of the matter is society has been more than generous and accommodating where the issue on gender identity is concerned.
People graciously overlook the intent of the people pushing certain issues in an attempt to focus on the actual issues. The same should apply here.
Their intention in this case is a matter of opinion, but ultimately it doesn't matter. What matters if they have shed light on an issue affecting many people within the LGBT community.
You crying and calling foul isn't going to get people to look the other way.