Battlefield 2042 (PS4, PS5, XB1, XSX, PC) (Nov 19)

FINALE

💎
Supporter
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
750
Reputation
190
Daps
2,554
Reppin
Raleigh
DICE has done it properly with BF3 and BF4.

They just add unnecessary innovations with every new game and deviate from their OG blueprint for a successful BF game. Ex. Operations, Firestorm, Hazard Zone, Specialists, etc etc.

They also release their games 1-2 years too early (BF4 included).

If the next BF game is just a BF3 and BF4 clone with better graphics w/ BC2 destruction and BFV movement then they got a classic on their hands
It's crazy. That's literally all it takes. That's how incredible 3, 4 and I've even throw in bad company two are
 

FINALE

💎
Supporter
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
750
Reputation
190
Daps
2,554
Reppin
Raleigh
Battlefield V had a lot of innovation mechanics that would have been great to see in other games. I personally don’t see this current iteration of DICE making what BF3 and BF4 great. They’ll make a competent shooter which I’ll play but the magic of BF3/4 was different. :whew:
I remember motherfukkers was mad that Battlefield 5 had women or some shyt. I don't know. I think both five and one were both really good games
 

CoolinInTheCut

Superstar
Joined
Mar 17, 2022
Messages
6,299
Reputation
1,205
Daps
14,190
Battlefield V had a lot of innovation mechanics that would have been great to see in other games. I personally don’t see this current iteration of DICE making what BF3 and BF4 great. They’ll make a competent shooter which I’ll play but the magic of BF3/4 was different.
:whew:

Sorry to inform you breh, but DICE is rolling the dice (no pun intended) again instead of going back to the OG blueprint :francis:



It's crazy. That's literally all it takes. That's how incredible 3, 4 and I've even throw in bad company two are

BF3 and BF4 were so good that I don't even care if they just redid the Battlefield Portal shyt and made a game that was just that but with every map from old BF games but with modern graphics and destruction.
 

Chef

All Star
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
3,532
Reputation
500
Daps
10,359
It's crazy. That's literally all it takes. That's how incredible 3, 4 and I've even throw in bad company two are
If those games were remade into one package with high resolution textures and high tick servers. I’d so cop. :pachaha:
I remember motherfukkers was mad that Battlefield 5 had women or some shyt. I don't know. I think both five and one were both really good games
I think fatigue of the both settings was a big factor into its reception. I’m a big military history buff so I didn’t mind but I can see the complaint. That fortification system is something I want in more Battlefield games. :blessed:

Sorry to inform you breh, but DICE is rolling the dice (no pun intended) again instead of going back to the OG blueprint :francis:





BF3 and BF4 were so good that I don't even care if they just redid the Battlefield Portal shyt and made a game that was just that but with every map from old BF games but with modern graphics and destruction.

As a breh who has been playing BF since the 1942 Wake Island demo - that video was depressing as fukk. :snoop:
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
990
Reputation
-55
Daps
2,347
DICE has done it properly with BF3 and BF4.

They just add unnecessary innovations with every new game and deviate from their OG blueprint for a successful BF game. Ex. Operations, Firestorm, Hazard Zone, Specialists, etc etc.

They also release their games 1-2 years too early (BF4 included).

If the next BF game is just a BF3 and BF4 clone with better graphics w/ BC2 destruction and BFV movement then they got a classic on their hands
Operations is nice tho:childplease:
 
Top