Batman had billions yet thought hand to hand combat was going to save Gotham

ciubaca

Superstar
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Messages
9,321
Reputation
3,648
Daps
29,295
:dead:at the ideas pitched in here. Yep, these ideas would make great comic books:dead:
 

The axe murderer

For I am death and I ride on a pale horse
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
40,319
Reputation
6,148
Daps
138,013
Well that's the point of Batman. He don't want to kill anyone even the villains. Everyone is worthy of being saved in his eyes. If he were to start killing the villains in Gotham he would be just as bad as them.
no he wouldn't. He's already seen as breaking the law with his vigilante shyt. Absolutely no one would be mad if he murked joker cept those crazed joker cults and fake outrage from tree hugging hippies. No one shed a tear when Dahmer got murked and batman faces guys that are threat to national security. The real reason he doesn't murk them is because he is mentally ill. That's why he goes on about that line and shyt. This is the same dude who recruits fukking child soldiers like robin
images
 

KravenMorehead™

Barrel Brothers.®
Joined
Nov 4, 2014
Messages
33,273
Reputation
9,800
Daps
95,462
Reppin
NoVA
1940's Batman wasn't playing them games.

I'm kinda tired of Batman movies as is but I would love to see a 'year one' type joint where you get to see him before he settled into having a no-kill code.

Having him merk a couple criminals and feeling guilty about it would actually give his rationale for not killing some context that you don't really get from most Batman content.

153100_v2.jpg


153102.jpg


:francis:

You show how OG Bats was fine with hanging a muthafukka and flying his corpse around town swinging from the batplane, him being so worried about becoming a monster makes a hell of a lot more sense than him just being a boy scout. Especially considering who he was trained by.
I just thought of something. Did Godfather III get the idea from this? :patrice:Or was this some shyt that mobsters was on in the first place...
 

WMG the 2nd

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
13,885
Reputation
2,977
Daps
60,670
no he wouldn't. He's already seen as breaking the law with his vigilante shyt. Absolutely no one would be mad if he murked joker cept those crazed joker cults and fake outrage from tree hugging hippies. No one shed a tear when Dahmer got murked and batman faces guys that are threat to national security. The real reason he doesn't murk them is because he is mentally ill. That's why he goes on about that line and shyt. This is the same dude who recruits fukking child soldiers like robin
images
That’s the other aspect lol
His partners in crime are an old ass butler and a child rebel soldier
And he’s fighting terrorists with boomerangs dude is fukking crazy
 

Sir Charles Barkley

The Chuckster
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
513
Reputation
-230
Daps
1,844
Reppin
TNT & Turner Family
no he wouldn't. He's already seen as breaking the law with his vigilante shyt. Absolutely no one would be mad if he murked joker cept those crazed joker cults and fake outrage from tree hugging hippies. No one shed a tear when Dahmer got murked and batman faces guys that are threat to national security. The real reason he doesn't murk them is because he is mentally ill. That's why he goes on about that line and shyt. This is the same dude who recruits fukking child soldiers like robin
images

the real reason he doesn’t murk the villains is because readers want them to keep returning.

but hey like joker insinuates in TDK, if batman were to just start killing people he didn’t like then what really separates the two of them?
 

WMG the 2nd

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
13,885
Reputation
2,977
Daps
60,670
the real reason he doesn’t murk the villains is because readers want them to keep returning.

but hey like jokers insinuates in TDK, if batman were to just start killing people he didn’t like then what really separates the two of them?
Killing and not killing does t separate them
Batman still out here driving his fist through mentally ill people and causing property damage nightly
Spider man makes more sense than Batman. Spider didn’t have a choice to be bit by s radioactive spider he happened to have that happen. Batman chose to spend 70 million on vehicles alone and millions in tech but he’s too good to take government and military contracts for war? He’s a psychopath with a big budget.
 

Sir Charles Barkley

The Chuckster
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
513
Reputation
-230
Daps
1,844
Reppin
TNT & Turner Family
Killing and not killing does t separate them
Batman still out here driving his fist through mentally ill people and causing property damage nightly
Spider man makes more sense than Batman. Spider didn’t have a choice to be bit by s radioactive spider he happened to have that happen. Batman chose to spend 70 million on vehicles alone and millions in tech but he’s too good to take government and military contracts for war? He’s a psychopath with a big budget.

huh? bruce often uses the wayne foundation to fund various charities and philanthropic organizations.
 

The axe murderer

For I am death and I ride on a pale horse
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
40,319
Reputation
6,148
Daps
138,013
the real reason he doesn’t murk the villains is because readers want them to keep returning.

but hey like joker insinuates in TDK, if batman were to just start killing people he didn’t like then what really separates the two of them?
of course its about the readers, but as mentioned in here batman already has bodies. I didn't say kill everyone he doesn't like but some people need to be dealt with permanently especially mass murderers like Mr. J. Even Superman put down Zod in the comics. Matter of fact we don't even have to put this on bats its the govt that keeps letting him out to kill more instead of putting him down or at least putting his ass in the phantom zone :mjlol:
 
Top