NubianVitruvian
Retired
Art is more about the artist.
Art is more about the artist.
shyt proves that I know nothing about, "art."
I'll be damned if I ever put that shyt on my wall.
Art is more about the artist.
Here's that $58m Jackson Pollock in the article. I'd take the Basquiat.
48 million could have saved lives of starving children but instead people are buying drawings that look like they were made by kindergardeners.
I think these paintings sell so well because they show the ugliness of the righteousness that demons try to portray. Like ultimately their righteousness is phony, and ugly, like Jean Michels artwork.
Its so demonic, friends.
Basquiat was a symbol of his time. When you look at the big picture and how it funneled down into this one person. They are saying his life was priceless and this was all I could afford to give to have a piece of his soul and history.
You can do this too. But your not going to see money like that while your alive. Value like everything else, is agreed upon. You are rare alive. But dead, even better.
The reason why a crown of Olives was worn by emperors was because Zeus had no need for gold. Life, the moment. Priceless. Money will come and go.
Hence, life is art. Creativity is unlimited in its power. Look what they did to Nikolai Tesla. It's bigger than hip hop brehs.
Art is more about the artist.
So how much money do you donate to starving children a year?