Were making the exact same point about the media, and I never said anything regarding the validity about the case, or the evidence, itt, at all. My early post was solely about the Media.
Actually, I'll make one comment about the case. I haven't been following the specifics about evidence or anything like that and i'll tell you why! I assume that the prosecutor is intelligent and earned her job for a reason, so I have faith that she did her due diligence on the evidence she received on the case. And by that, I mean she must have went threw it with a fine tooth comb, preparing and reassuring herself that the charges she brought forth will stick in a court of law. If the evidence could be exploited/weak, she wouldn't of brought the charges up, because she would have realized that from the start.