Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Victim of an honor killing

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,805
Daps
152,090
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
She grew up in a privilege home in Kenya, her dad was a secular politician. She has never been to Somalia, or lived under "Sharia-law".
After 9/11, she knew Islamaphobia was her ticket to rich and fame, look at her now.

loved by atheist, racist and Islamaphobes, sold her soul to the devil for worldly possessions.

Definitely gonna be burning with iblis in the hereafter.

:ohhh:
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,805
Daps
152,090
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
what did you like and not like? If you actually read it give me a breakdown

The book is great. She talks about her life in Somalia and how she lived in fear of the warlords and shyt. She also talks about how women were treated like disposable goods, and shed light on how women who were raped were shunned by family and friends alike. Its been a while since I read her book, but I think she fled Somalia after being a victim of rape and apparently her family wanted to kill her to save their reputation. She however fled to Amsterdam, gained asylum, and the rest is history. .

However, since arriving in Amsterdam it appears she has gone full c00n, hence the reason I can't fukk with her.
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,938
Daps
23,300
Reppin
W/S 416
She lacks integrity. Her sob story, the same one she used to get asylum and citizenship in the Netherlands and build a political/media career was full of lies and exaggeration, and the reason she left the Netherlands in the first place is because she was exposed, which threw her citizenship status into question. She silenced her own opinions and became a willing mouthpiece for the far-right in the Netherlands, even against her own beliefs, going so far as to campaign against citizenship for refugees who had been persecuted (people in her own position). She spoke out in support of the psychotic Anders Breivik and said that his Christian paranoia about secularism was justified (strange, for an avowed atheist). Her husband is Niall Ferguson, the neo-Imperialist cheerleader and the dude who recently said that Keynesianism was invalidated because Keynes might have been gay.

She destroyed her own reputation by being a careerist instead of an honest activist. That being said, I do respect some of her work with women in the Muslim world. Muslim women need a better champion, though.

:wow:

tell this biitch to :camby:
 

KingpinOG

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
3,339
Reputation
-3,360
Daps
2,460
Reppin
Ohio
She lacks integrity. Her sob story, the same one she used to get asylum and citizenship in the Netherlands and build a political/media career was full of lies and exaggeration, and the reason she left the Netherlands in the first place is because she was exposed, which threw her citizenship status into question. She silenced her own opinions and became a willing mouthpiece for the far-right in the Netherlands, even against her own beliefs, going so far as to campaign against citizenship for refugees who had been persecuted (people in her own position). She spoke out in support of the psychotic Anders Breivik and said that his Christian paranoia about secularism was justified (strange, for an avowed atheist). Her husband is Niall Ferguson, the neo-Imperialist cheerleader and the dude who recently said that Keynesianism was invalidated because Keynes might have been gay.

She destroyed her own reputation by being a careerist instead of an honest activist. That being said, I do respect some of her work with women in the Muslim world. Muslim women need a better champion, though.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it, but why prevent her from speaking at a commencement ceremony?

Why do you left wingers continually shut down any opinion that you don't like?
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
That is your opinion and you are entitled to it, but why prevent her from speaking at a commencement ceremony?

Why do you left wingers continually shut down any opinion that you don't like?

The only opinion I stated was that I think Muslim women deserve better. The rest were facts about her personal history.

I'm not trying to prevent her from speaking. She has achieved success and does some good work. But were I in charge, I wouldn't invite a fraudulent careerist to be the speaker in the first place- she is that, too.
 

Nomad1

Tupac KONY and GOAT
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
13,765
Reputation
4,002
Daps
39,680
Reppin
Toronto
This bytch is a fraud and a disgrace to Somali's :russ:. I cringe every time I hear her name :scusthov:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
That is a good point. The American left actually has a lot in common with extreme Muslims in that they both work to silence opposing viewpoints.

This story is a great example of that.

Speaking of silencing opposing viewpoints, the actual comments Ali was criticized for are reproduced here: Today's Specious "Free Speech" Martyr - Lawyers, Guns & Money : Lawyers, Guns & Money

Reason: Here in the United States, you’d advocate the abolition of—

Hirsi Ali: All Muslim schools. Close them down. Yeah, that sounds absolutist. I think 10 years ago things were different, but now the jihadi genie is out of the bottle. I’ve been saying this in Australia and in the U.K. and so on, and I get exactly the same arguments: The Constitution doesn’t allow it. But we need to ask where these constitutions came from to start with—what’s the history of Article 23 in the Netherlands, for instance? There were no Muslim schools when the constitution was written. There were no jihadists. They had no idea.


The University stated that these comments, the idea of shutting down religious freedom, were antithetical to the views of the University. If a University declined to allow a vicious anti-Christian speaker who wanted all Christian schools shut down, would you consider it a bigoted liberal attack meant to silence that person?
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,265
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,965
Reppin
Brooklyn
Speaking of silencing opposing viewpoints, the actual comments Ali was criticized for are reproduced here: Today's Specious "Free Speech" Martyr - Lawyers, Guns & Money : Lawyers, Guns & Money

Reason: Here in the United States, you’d advocate the abolition of—

Hirsi Ali: All Muslim schools. Close them down. Yeah, that sounds absolutist. I think 10 years ago things were different, but now the jihadi genie is out of the bottle. I’ve been saying this in Australia and in the U.K. and so on, and I get exactly the same arguments: The Constitution doesn’t allow it. But we need to ask where these constitutions came from to start with—what’s the history of Article 23 in the Netherlands, for instance? There were no Muslim schools when the constitution was written. There were no jihadists. They had no idea.


The University stated that these comments, the idea of shutting down religious freedom, were antithetical to the views of the University. If a University declined to allow a vicious anti-Christian speaker who wanted all Christian schools shut down, would you consider it a bigoted liberal attack meant to silence that person?

When they're being used as terrorist training camps and indoctrination schemes with Government money I think a line may be necessary...


Look at religious schools in New York in regards to the quality of education as well.


Maybe you see their freedom to wage Jihad as being more important.
 
Top