Axed French workers take on US giant Bain Capital

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,224
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,854
Reppin
Brooklyn
sasmonite-afp.jpg

© AFP | File picture
Text by Thomas HUBERT

Latest update : 2014-03-04

Around 20 French former employees of the luggage manufacturer Samsonite are travelling to the US to defend their case against Bain Capital, a former owner of their company, in what French media have labelled "a struggle between David and Goliath".

The trial pitting Samsonite’s laid-off workers against the private equity fund founded by former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is due before a federal court in Boston on Wednesday March 5, 2014.

“For seven years, we have said that we would not give up our fight until the last person responsible for destroying our jobs was prosecuted,” Brigitte Petit, a former employee of the Samsonite factory in the French northern town of Hénin-Beaumont, told FRANCE 24 on Tuesday.

Bain Capital Private Equity acquired the troubled luggage manufacturer in 2003. Two years later, the firm sold its only French factory for one euro to EnergyPlast, which pledged to use the factory to produce solar panels. In 2007, the new owners filed for bankruptcy. The 205 staff members' redundancy packages had to be paid with taxpayers' money.

French courts have since convicted the management of EnergyPlast of organising their fraudulent bankruptcy. In 2012, a Paris appeals court sent three French managers to prison and sentenced them to paying back 2.5 million euros they had illegally siphoned off from the company.

Yet the dismissed workers failed to secure a wider case against Bain Capital in France and took their grievances to the courts of the Boston-based fund’s home jurisdiction.

Filmmaker Hélène Desplanques made a documentary about the case in 2012, "Liquidation totale".

“Abusive” redundancies

“From the very beginning, the shareholders plotted those abusive dismissals,” said Brigitte Petit, who now chairs AC Samsonite, a group defending the laid-off workers. “They came in for three years to make a profit without any consideration for people’s jobs,” she added from the transit area of Dublin airport.

Far-right National Front targets Hénin-Beaumont
The US court case takes place less than three weeks before French municipal elections, in which Hénin-Beaumont is tipped to elect the secretary-general of the far-right National Front as its mayor.
Party leader Marine Le Pen has targeted Hénin-Beaumont, a working-class town of 26,000 at the heart of the ruling socialist-led coalition’s electoral base, in successive local and national polls.
She ran for a parliamentary seat there in 2007 and 2012, narrowly losing to a coalition of left-wing parties.
Analysts say many working-class voters who used to support left-leaning parties in the unemployment-stricken industrial regions of northern France have been seduced by the National Front’s anti-globalisation rhetoric.

In addition to grants from local authorities, AC Samsonite has raised 16,000 euros from the public through “Christmas market sales” and private donations to fund its representatives’ trip to Boston. Petit said her former colleagues could not have paid for it themselves: “Very few have found permanent jobs, most are part-timers. There aren’t that many factories left in our region.”

The employees’ lawyer, Fiodor Rilov, told "Le Monde" newspaper that “Bain Capital orchestrated a manipulation to get rid of the Hénin-Beaumont factory by precipitating its bankruptcy”. By selling off its French subsidiary for one euro, the complainants argue that the shareholder made undue savings on redundancy packages and other disposal costs. Rilov says this helped Bain make a $1.7 billion profit on its holding in Samsonite when it sold on the company in 2007.

Although Bain Capital has not answered questions from FRANCE 24 or other media on the case, its website states that “Bain Capital’s investment paid down all term debt, leaving [Samsonite] with significantly less leverage, limited financial covenants and a patient capital structure under which to implement change.”

“Under Bain Capital’s ownership, the company grew revenue strongly and increased profitability,” the website adds.

http://www.france24.com/en/20140304-france-us-samsonite-bain-capital-lawsuit-unemployment/
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,500
Daps
37,705
france is also lowering utility rates. i guess the conscience of europe can only take you so far.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
I don't get this they sold the plant for one euro?

isn't energy plast to blame here? they're the ones who declared bankruptcy.

I think Bain originally wanted to sell the company's assets and fire everyone. However I'm not certain French unionisation laws allow such direct action. It appears Bain bought the French manufacturing company, sold it to a partner or affiliate and then had the affiliate declare bankruptcy. That way Bain keeps the money it made from selling the company's assets doesn't have to pay any of the workers for firing them. Instead the taxpayers' pay the worker's severance.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
So they are suing Bain Capital for essentially buying and selling off another firm? The casewill be dismissed.

they need to sue in France because France has some ridiculous laws regarding this stuff and the new president hates the whole financial sector.

They have no case against Bain. Maybe against this EnergyPlast company but not Bain.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Here's why this is shady.
You buy a company for 1X millions that has 2X millions in assets and liabilities of 1X millions (pensions, vendors bills, etc, etc)

Run it for 3 years siphoning off the 2X millions worth of assets.
Sell it for $1 to a company that is goign bankrupt.

You've essentially just walked away from 1X millions in liabilities. Its shady as fuk at best, fraud at worst.
 

Domingo Halliburton

Handmade in USA
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
12,616
Reputation
1,370
Daps
15,451
Reppin
Brooklyn Without Limits
I think Bain originally wanted to sell the company's assets, fire everyone and reap in the money for themselves. However I'm not certain French unionisation laws allow such direct action. It appears Bain bought the French manufacturing company, sold it to a partner or affiliate and had the affiliate declare bankruptcy. That way Bain keeps the money it made from selling the company's assets, doesn't have to sort through French uniionization law and doesn't have to pay any of the workers for firing them.

gotcha.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Oh you know what this is like?

This would be like me knowing i was going to file bankruptcy in a year. Then in that year buying all sorts of shyt on credit and selling it to you for pennies on the dollar, or literally just a dollar then telling my creditors to go fuk themselves i'm bankrupt.

Guess what, that's illegal...at least i'm pretty sure it is...if only there was a place i could ask such questions :smile:
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,614
Reppin
Los Angeles
Here's why this is shady.
You buy a company for 1X millions that has 2X millions in assets and liabilities of 1X millions (pensions, vendors bills, etc, etc)

Run it for 3 years siphoning off the 2X millions worth of assets.
Sell it for $1 to a company that is goign bankrupt.

You've essentially just walked away from 1X millions in liabilities. Its shady as fuk at best, fraud at worst.
Isnt that capitalism?
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,614
Reppin
Los Angeles
by that logic isn't slavery? Just cause it's capitalistic doesn't make it right or beneficial. That's why we have regulations.
Laws exist that allow them to do this for a reason though so it seems like regulation is on the side of the busines.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Laws exist that allow them to do this for a reason though so it seems like regulation is on the side of the busines.
Well that's why they're going to court isn't it? To find out if laws do allow them. Also, a law allowing something doesn't always make it a right or good decision.
 

Mr. Somebody

Friend Of A Friend
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
28,262
Reputation
2,041
Daps
43,614
Reppin
Los Angeles
Well that's why they're going to court isn't it? To find out if laws do allow them. Also, a law allowing something doesn't always make it a right or good decision.
Capitalism isnt about right and good but we'll see what happens here. Legally i dont think they will win.
 
Top