Avengers 5 : Doomsday

[Kidd Dibiase]

 

[The Devil's Advocate]

BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT
TO SEE A BLACK MAN GET DONE DIRTY.

HES A GREAT ACTOR.
MARVEL JUST FUMBLED THE STORY LINE
BEFORE HE EVER CAUGHT THE CASE.

HE WAS THE ONLY GOOD THING
ABOUT ANT MAN
BUT THEY SQUASHED HIS CHARACTER.


​

To be fair.. His acting on Loki was AFTER ant-man and that's when everyone fell in love with the character

It was too late as the case was already happening. But I think that if that case doesn't happen, and Loki continued as is, we'd be dying for Kang to come crush the buildings again

 

[CHICAGO]

To be fair.. His acting on Loki was AFTER ant-man and that's when everyone fell in love with the character

It was too late as the case was already happening. But I think that if that case doesn't happen, and Loki continued as is, we'd be dying for Kang to come crush the buildings again

LOKI CAME OUT BEFORE ANTMAN
WHICH SET THE STAGE FOR
KANG APPEARING IN ANTMAN.

BY THE TIME LOKI S2 CAME OUT
EVERYONE WAS WONDERING
IF THEY WERE GONNA WRITE
HIM OUT THE SCRIPT
WHICH THEY ULTIMATELY DID.


​

 

[jdubnyce]

To be fair.. His acting on Loki was AFTER ant-man and that's when everyone fell in love with the character

It was too late as the case was already happening. But I think that if that case doesn't happen, and Loki continued as is, we'd be dying for Kang to come crush the buildings again

HWR was introduced before Quantamania breh

The whole premise of Loki season 1 ender was to introduce HWR (Kang) and roll into Quantam

 

[null]

Introduce mutants by rehashing the same ole Fox bullshyt brehs.


Feige definitely has lost whatever “magic” he had. Just nostalgia baiting now,

how many recent MCU productions have been under full feige (-chapek/) control.

I think FF is the first one. just about.

even daredevil is a mix of old + new management productions. cap 4 too.

Disney To Re-Focus On Quality Over Quantity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LznGwd-V2s Earlier today, Disney held a special Town Hall event for employees today, which was hosted by CEO Bob Iger at the New Amsterdam Theatre and it was moderated by ABC ...

whatsondisneyplus.com

 

[dakidbanks]

I think the Kang in Ant Man was suppose to be the 1 to come back and be the main Kang but no 1 accepted how he lost in that movie… we all know his acting wasn’t the problem

 

[dakidbanks]

Nope. Like I said for the billionth time, the classic X-Men outfits should be saved for the MCU X-Men. There's no need for the Fox X-Men to wear them.

I look at Doomsday and Secret Wars as a farewell to the nostalgia characters. It’s only right we get to see them on screen visually done right as opposed to what Fox let happen. Magneto, Colossus and Deadpool were literally like the only ones who looked close to their comic counterparts and Colossus didn’t look that way until Deadpool

Hugh and sir Patrick look great in how the MCU dressed them… I’ll take the X Men costumes over the black leather

If they want to keep Mystique naked, I’m cool with that tho

 

[Jazzy B.]

HWR was introduced before Quantamania breh

The whole premise of Loki season 1 ender was to introduce HWR (Kang) and roll into Quantam

Nope.

He who remains and Kang were going to be separate characters.

They were only combined after Majors got hired for Ant Man 3.

This is why Kang JOBBED in Ant Man 3 because the character was originally meant to be a one off villain for that movie. The director wanted Ant Man to beat a big villain.

But they were blown away by J Majors acting and could see he was on course to be the new “It” actor so halfway during production decided to make J Majors the new big bad of everything. This is also why Kang’s build was trash Marvel were making it up as they went along. It’s probably why they also didn’t recast as the whole thing in their eyes was built on the character being played by J Majors.

 

[jwinfield]

Russos got this

Do they?

 

[HipHopStan]

Jonathan Majors is a great actor, but I was never much of a Kang the Conqueror fan anyway, so I’m not too torn up about his exit. I put Kang in the same category as Apocalypse—villains with grand, time-spanning ambitions, but ultimately lacking in sheer presence. Kang’s reliance on time-travel mechanics makes him more of a logistical headache than a true menace, a villain whose battles feel more like navigating paradoxes than actually fighting for power. Yes, controlling time is formidable, but it’s abstract—it dilutes the personal stakes that make great villains compelling. Doom, on the other hand, dominates through intellect, willpower, and an unshakable belief in his own superiority. His legacy in the comics runs deep, from toppling the Beyonder in Secret Wars to wielding the literal power of a god in Doomwar. Marvel should have built their next saga around him from the start, but thanks to the Fox deal, they had to settle for a placeholder—until now. When it comes to a worthy successor to Thanos, I’ll take Doom over Kang any day.

 

[Lootpack]

 

[jdubnyce]

The misdirection
I see you Halle
I see you

 

[Rekkapryde]

The misdirection
I see you Halle
I see you

Yeah, I think she cappin too.

 

[CHICAGO]

Nope.

He who remains and Kang were going to be separate characters.

They were only combined after Majors got hired for Ant Man 3.

This is why Kang JOBBED in Ant Man 3 because the character was originally meant to be a one off villain for that movie. The director wanted Ant Man to beat a big villain.

But they were blown away by J Majors acting and could see he was on course to be the new “It” actor so halfway during production decided to make J Majors the new big bad of everything. This is also why Kang’s build was trash Marvel were making it up as they went along. It’s probably why they also didn’t recast as the whole thing in their eyes was built on the character being played by J Majors.

NOT TRUE....

LOKI WAS FILMED BEFORE ANT MAN.

THEY WERE BLOWN AWAY
BY HIS ACTING IN LOKI S1
AND DECIDED TO BUILD EVERYTHING
AROUND HIM WHICH IS WHY
HE WAS IN ANT MAN AFTERWARDS


​

 

[CHICAGO]

Jonathan Majors is a great actor, but I was never much of a Kang the Conqueror fan anyway, so I’m not too torn up about his exit. I put Kang in the same category as Apocalypse—villains with grand, time-spanning ambitions, but ultimately lacking in sheer presence. Kang’s reliance on time-travel mechanics makes him more of a logistical headache than a true menace, a villain whose battles feel more like navigating paradoxes than actually fighting for power. Yes, controlling time is formidable, but it’s abstract—it dilutes the personal stakes that make great villains compelling. Doom, on the other hand, dominates through intellect, willpower, and an unshakable belief in his own superiority. His legacy in the comics runs deep, from toppling the Beyonder in Secret Wars to wielding the literal power of a god in Doomwar. Marvel should have built their next saga around him from the start, but thanks to the Fox deal, they had to settle for a placeholder—until now. When it comes to a worthy successor to Thanos, I’ll take Doom over Kang any day.

THEY BOUGHT FOX IN 2019.

MCU NOT USING DOOM DIDNT
HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH FOX.

THEY DIDNT DECIDE TO
GO WITH KANG UNTIL LATE 2020.


​