Australia High Court to Decide if Aboriginals Without Citizenship Can Be Deported

you're NOT "n!ggas"

FKA ciroq drobama
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,640
Reputation
6,361
Daps
63,342
Reppin
Astronomy (8th light)
2019-04-18-21_31_24-Capture-600x335.png

Australia, a country taken over by white colonizers after the Black indigenous population had lived there for 65,000 years, will now determine if Aboriginal people without Australian citizenship are aliens who are subject to deportation.

There is a case before the High Court of Australia that will establish whether an indigenous person can be considered an alien under the nation’s constitution. Two men, Daniel Love and Brendan Thoms, have filed a lawsuit in which the court will determine whether an Aboriginal Australian with at least one Australian parent — one who was born in another country, came to Australia as a young child and has only left the country briefly — and is not an Australian citizen is an alien under section 51 (xix) of the Australian Constitution. That section allows the Parliament to enact laws concerning “naturalization and aliens.”

The answer the plaintiffs have gotten is no. “For descendants of Australia’s first peoples, an indelible part of the Australian community, to be ‘aliens’ for the purposes of Australia’s Constitution, is antithetical to their indigeneity and to the social, democratic and political values which underpin and are protected by the Constitution The concept of Aboriginality is inconsistent with the concept of alienage,” the men say in their filing with the court.


Full article: Australia High Court to Decide if Aboriginals Without Citizenship Can Be Deported
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,965
Reputation
-446
Daps
45,074
Really depressing. They’re trying to eliminate the ethnic group by using language and laws. The group should be able to define themselves and not be a government affair. What’s worse, how in the hell is deportation at stake? It’s like they’re trying to purge two groups at the same time since the stipulation is based on if the person has one non Australian born parent. It’s like they don’t want foreigners and aboriginals there.

So disgusting...
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
18,912
Reputation
2,982
Daps
44,454
Deport them where? :mindblown: The very definition of aboriginal is native, original, indigenous, existing before the arrival of colonists. This shouldn't even be up for debate. That is some sick shyt.

deport them to where they were born....lol, it says it right there that they weren't born in australia and didnt obtain citizenship while they were there

"one who was born in another country, came to Australia as a young child and has only left the country briefly — and is not an Australian citizen"
i guess its similar to the american "dreamers" situation, except one of the parents is a native of australia
 

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,150
Reputation
2,269
Daps
34,909
Reppin
NULL
deport them to where they were born....lol, it says it right there that they weren't born in australia and didnt obtain citizenship while they were there

"one who was born in another country, came to Australia as a young child and has only left the country briefly — and is not an Australian citizen"
i guess its similar to the american "dreamers" situation, except one of the parents is a native of australia

His parents didnt complete the paperwork .....
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,474
Daps
136,049
deport them to where they were born....lol, it says it right there that they weren't born in australia and didnt obtain citizenship while they were there

"one who was born in another country, came to Australia as a young child and has only left the country briefly — and is not an Australian citizen"
i guess its similar to the american "dreamers" situation, except one of the parents is a native of australia


Considering Australia's history, I still dont think this should be up for debate. That's a lot of nerve.
 

you're NOT "n!ggas"

FKA ciroq drobama
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,640
Reputation
6,361
Daps
63,342
Reppin
Astronomy (8th light)
deport them to where they were born....lol, it says it right there that they weren't born in australia and didnt obtain citizenship while they were there

"one who was born in another country, came to Australia as a young child and has only left the country briefly — and is not an Australian citizen"
i guess its similar to the american "dreamers" situation, except one of the parents is a native of australia
The point is if you're Aboriginal, "Australia" should be your rightful home. Your ancestry and lineage precede the damn country. The fact that they're even trying this speaks volumes.


It'd be like if... Y'all know :hubie:
 

Cuban Pete

Aka 305DeadCounty
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,053
Reputation
8,081
Daps
70,556
Reppin
SOHH ICEY MONOPOLY
Why are these Germanic/British descent countries always the most fukking racist :ohhh:

Like, all European countries have racist issues, the Western/Colonist ones especially but

Britain
Germany
America
Canada
Australia
South Africa

Are on some other OTHER shyt specifically. France is horrible too as is Spain but these countries are still super ACTIVE with the racial shyt
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
18,912
Reputation
2,982
Daps
44,454
The point is if you're Aboriginal, "Australia" should be your rightful home. Your ancestry and lineage precede the damn country. The fact that they're even trying this speaks volumes.


It'd be like if... Y'all know :hubie:

idk, im pretty sure this is the law in all countries. im first generation american, i cant go to my dad's village in nigeria and claim im a nigerian citizen.

if it was based on ancestry and lineage mexicans should be able to stay here. most of the western US was originally mexico lol
 
Last edited:
Top