torcher
Superstar
Wade would average 40 plus in Jerry West era
I didn't avoid nothing dwight sucks and is a byproduct of a weak position right now. and he was almost as good as a young kareem your point?i like how you avoided the hieght discrepancy.
The point i was making is this: he was almost retired and still almost as good as Kareem.
Such a terrible poster. Even your insults are second rate.Shut up, skank
Iverson? Top 3?
If he was top 3 he'd still be playing right now.
He's 39, Jordan was putting up 20ppg at age 40. Kobe if he doesn't hurt again prolly will be putting up at least 15 too.
But obviously we can't put Iverson up there with MJ and Kobe
You can't even put him past wade unless you Ignore all of Wade's success and Rings
But ignoring that....You still can't
Even with Wade's lazy defense he played last year at age 32 he was still better defensively than Iverson was in his prime.
Wade is a two way player Iverson is a One Way player.
And he isn't even that much better on offense than wade.
Iverson highest career shooting percentage for a singe season is 46%.
If Wade shot that percentage it would be the lowest he's ever had.
Educate yourself. This myth is nonsensewilt was in the league for 10 years before he had to worry about kareem. his only threat was a 6'9 center.
And if he was doing that going against a team that had eight Hall of Famers instead of just three? Wilt was only there for a handful of seasons too, not West's entire career.Imagine if Jerry West played in this era, winning only one championship out of eight Finals, playing with the likes of Wilt Chamberlain and Elgin Baylor (both of whom would also get shyt on)... he'd be the biggest media target in history.
See the post above yours.Bron can never be GOAT because he's 2-3 in the Finals. West is better than Wade despite going 1-8 in the Finals. Gotta love The Coli
I'm aware. West was a hell of a player, but we can't suddenly disregard postseason success. But if that's the case, I don't see an argument for anyone other than Mike being a better SGSee the post above yours.
There is no argument for anyone above Mike. That Celtics dynasty has 7 or 8 HOFers during their run. The Lakers had West and Baylor for most of that period with Goodrich and Wilt near the end. There was a huge gap in talent between the Celts and everybody else.I'm aware. West was a hell of a player, but we can't suddenly disregard postseason success. But if that's the case, I don't see an argument for anyone other than Mike being a better SG
Do you really believe this?Wade would average 40 plus in Jerry West era
EVER.
YesDo you really believe this?