Atlanta falcons linebackers call themselves D-block: The official skins vs battybirds

Stone

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
14,922
Reputation
651
Daps
29,841
Reppin
NULL
So that means they would have never scored a touchdown then? Don't understand that logic.

just like I don't understand the logic of "they probably would have won" if the other guy stayed in, when they weren't even scoring when he was in.
 

YoungOldHead

Herbal/Beer Connoisseur
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
214
Reputation
-50
Daps
275
Reppin
Gate City
just like I don't understand the logic of "they probably would have won" if the other guy stayed in, when they weren't even scoring when he was in.

Considering RG3 is considerably better and they lost by a touchdown I don't see why it's so hard to comprehend. They easily could have still lost with him in the game but i just personally think he could have pulled it out barring any ridiculous late game meltdown.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,252
Reputation
6,217
Daps
167,623
No that means up until a blown coverage TD, Redskins never saw the endzone and they never really had control of the game even with RG3 in.

:comeon:

we ran the ball down your throat

that doesnt mean the Redskins were gonna win, but be real
 

Maddmike

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,879
Reputation
1,246
Daps
23,729
Reppin
NULL
:comeon:

we ran the ball down your throat

that doesnt mean the Redskins were gonna win, but be real

I sort of agree with you to the fact that along with you guys killing us on the run and if the coaches would have let RG3 get into a passing rhythm at the beginning, you might have had a chance. But why are we talking what ifs when none of that happened?
 
Top