Not choosing sides(as the Religious vs Non-Religious debate is stupid to me), but can you explain how you came to this conclusion?
Anyone has learned how White Supremacy works, is it's a system that creates mini-systems under it. It had uses many systems like Capitalism, Neo-Colonialism, Globalism to spread the masses of non-whites that these systems are they way of the future, without telling them it's what is truly is. In those examples I used are smaller mini-systems that promote certain fields like science and education/physiology that merely makes it seem like it's the gospel but always had the agenda at hand. Atheism falls under these systems to discredit and help promote the fields as gospel without question. Many atheists follow the 2 party systems and validate voting for those. They support the wars, conflicts, interventions. Most Atheist don't argue against White Supremacy because most don't think it exist.
The stances of many of the leading Atheists and fore-fathers of it argue....
Bill Maher "We Need to Promote Death". He enjoys telling people Apartheid is acceptable to those occupation Palestine because it's Jews land. It's a racist thought process.
Ayn Rand "It is
capitalism that abolished serfdom and slavery in all the civilized countries of the world. It is the capitalist North that destroyed the slavery of the agrarian-feudal South in the United States"
"the Negroes -- are now in the vanguard of the destruction of these rights"
Christopher Hitchens- Supported George Bush invasion on Iraq because he despised Muslims and Arabs as a whole. He was greatly on surviving European Nationalism. Also believed Israel occupation is right. His ignorance goes only to bring up Sept 11th. Same with his buddy Richard Dawkins. Instead of focusing on actually religion itself, they see the impact based off headlines on the news and tv media.
I can go on about the many things that contradict these people mind-state but it's based off agendas. You can disagree with my view and it's fine.