Religion/Spirituality Atheism Discussion

Shaman

Poet
Supporter
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
1,374
Reputation
615
Daps
6,265
Reppin
QC
Also, who/what gives a 'big c' Creator any intrinsic value? The Creator's Creator? Or, if the Creator was not created and has always existed, then HOW does the Creator have any value - since you stated that to have any value you have to have "a transcendent, moral, valuable, intrinsically worthy first cause" :ohhh:
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,960
Daps
25,307
Ok. What's your point? You think non-religious people don't already know this?

My point is I dnt understand how atheists goin around condemning people or talm bout human rights..or say one culture is more evil or one type of behavior is more evil than another when based on their worldview..those things dont exist on an objective level.

On an objective level according to the naturalistic worldview

We have no rights
We have no worth

And when I say objective in case you dont know, i mean outside of worth/rights given to us by culture/state/govt.
 

BlvdBrawler

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,715
Reputation
469
Daps
19,546
Reppin
NULL
believe in objective morality and live as though humans are of any value?:mindblown:

Honest question..Im taking a lil break from my Hov stannery, sorry brehs

But anyways how can an atheist do things like fight for human rights?

Or believe in objective morality as a whole?

Correct me if Im wrong but atheists believe that we arent created we are jus here...products of time, chance and matter.

If thats the case, doesnt that mean objectively we are beings of no value
And without value, morality cant exist.

So how is it Im seeing Atheist nikkaz tryna talk about human rights, being good, and sht when based on the claim of their beliefs...that sht doesnt exist :birdman:

Because it's just that, objective. One doesn't need to believe in God to know that curbstomping an infant would be wrong, that's just common sense and basic human morality.
 

woodblock

Rookie
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
53
Reputation
0
Daps
29
Reppin
NULL
Im not saying that..Im saying how can you claim to believe one thing but then live and believe things about people contrary to the worldview you claim to have :whoo:

You see a contradiction when really there isn't one. I think humans have value because they're human - I don't see why there needs to be a justification beyond that. To be totally honest, I think everyone reasons in this way on some level, religious or not. When you hear about some innocent getting hurt or killed, do you feel bad because you think "wow, that person has value in the eyes of a transcendent creator, and so it's bad that something bad happened to them"? No man, you just think "shyt, that's bad". Because you're a human just like them.
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,960
Daps
25,307
Because it's just that, objective. One doesn't need to believe in God to know that curbstomping an infant would be wrong, that's just common sense and basic human morality.

You know its wrong..but how can you give an accounting for what is good and what is bad?

If the universe is just time and chance acting on matter then what is "horrible",
what is "terrible", what is "wrong"?

Of course you can feel a certain way before you can give accounting for it but based on the naturalistic worldview, how do you give an accounting for whats good or bad?
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,277
Reputation
2,250
Daps
53,042
Reppin
Continental U.S.
Because it's just that, objective. One doesn't need to believe in God to know that curbstomping an infant would be wrong, that's just common sense and basic human morality.

No breh! Common sense is subjective culture! Morality is instilled through a sense of reprisal of wrong doing from a higher power whether it be God, Allah, Buddha, ect... If I am meant to die unto obscurity with no eternal repercussion than I can do whatever I please if within the precept of the society that I can get away with or feel embolden to get away with
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,960
Daps
25,307
Maybe it does to you, but what you've described here is the OPPOSITE of objective morality.

No because personhood is inextricably bound to the question of morality.

In other words..you cant raise up a question of morality that doesnt have to do with personhood
 

MIAlien

#FactsOnly
Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,284
Reputation
420
Daps
4,565
Reppin
Wade County
believe in objective morality and live as though humans are of any value?:mindblown:

Honest question..Im taking a lil break from my Hov stannery, sorry brehs

But anyways how can an atheist do things like fight for human rights?

Or believe in objective morality as a whole?

Correct me if Im wrong but atheists believe that we arent created we are jus here...products of time, chance and matter.

If thats the case, doesnt that mean objectively we are beings of no value
And without value, morality cant exist.

So how is it Im seeing Atheist nikkaz tryna talk about human rights, being good, and sht when based on the claim of their beliefs...that sht doesnt exist :birdman:
Despite all the backlash, it's a good question. Many believers and religious people haven't considered where else these rights could come from, but it's just as simple as coming from a God, but a lot closer to reality.

Believers tend to think they have natural rights, bestowed upon them by God at birth. That's a simple enough answer for them. For atheists, these fundamental human rights spring from our rationality, the same thing that leads many of us to the truth that there is no god.

In order for people to live and maximize their happiness and potential, we must all agree to a certain set of rules that allows us all to coexist and live without fear. It's just the Social Contract Theory, and it all stems from rational human thought.
 
Top