As long as it's not mayweather getting f*cked I don't even care

[Lavish]

I scored that fight 116-112, Pac. At best you could say it was 115-113 for Marquez. That shyt wasn't a robbery; it was a close fight and one guy was going to get the decision, and it wasn't the guy you wanted. Emmanuel Steward said it during the fight - just because Marquez was doing better than people expected doesn't mean that he was winning the fight.

This fight, on the other hand, was a blowout. NOBODY had Bradley winnning this fight except the judges.

I'm not even a fan of any individual fighter (except Zab, and he's not in this discussion), but I recognize bullshyt when it's bullshyt.

I'm not a fan of Marquez or PAC, so save that "it wasn't the guy you wanted" for someone else fam. Marquez won, ur jus too much of a fanboy to see it. I know your type.

Which is y I made this thread, to get all u PAC roaches In one place and spray raid on all u bytches at the same time.

 

[Majestic Pape]

I'm not a fan of Marquez or PAC, so save that "it wasn't the guy you wanted" for someone else fam. Marquez won, ur jus too much of a fanboy to see it. I know your type.

Which is y I made this thread, to get all u PAC roaches In one place and spray raid on all u bytches at the same time.

Which rounds did you give Marquez? I have my doubts you even watched the fight.

 

[Lavish]

Which rounds did you give Marquez? I have my doubts you even watched the fight.

I didn't watch the fight because I say many lost?

As far as rounds, I'm going off memory

I remember many took the first but then

2,4,5,6,7,8,10

Was all marquez

 

[Pop123]

I wanted Bradley to win, but he lost that.....but u know what? Who cares

PAC man robbed Marquez so he should of had another loss to his record anyways.



The only thing I'm worried about is the blatant robbery being acceptable

Meaning mayweather can destroy PAC man, and if they wanted to, they could fukk him over. Then we'd have a problem


But as far as this fight,


Ah well

wise words being quoted

 

[Majestic Pape]

I didn't watch the fight because I say many lost?

As far as rounds, I'm going off memory

I remember many took the first but then

2,4,5,6,7,8,10

Was all marquez

Hold up, you got it 7-5? And that' a robbery to you?

I don't agree with your score (those middle rounds in particular), and I watched the fight again today, but I won't dismiss it because there were close rounds in the fight. But you got a fight with more than two rounds that could have gone either way depending on the judge classified as a robbery in comparison to this fight we saw tonight?

 

[Lavish]

Hol up, you got it 7-5? And that' a robbery to you?

I don't agree with your score, and I watched the fight again today, but I won't dismiss it because there were close rounds in the fight. But you got a fight with more than two rounds that could have gone either way depending on the judge classified as a robbery in comparison to this fight we saw tonight?

It's not just the number of rounds he won, it's the points in those rounds

It's a robbery because the winner was clear similar to this figh where the winner was clear

Don't ask me to tell u in points bc I really don't remember

 

[CurrencyChase]

I wanted Bradley to win, but he lost that.....but u know what? Who cares

PAC man robbed Marquez so he should of had another loss to his record anyways.



The only thing I'm worried about is the blatant robbery being acceptable

Meaning mayweather can destroy PAC man, and if they wanted to, they could fukk him over. Then we'd have a problem


But as far as this fight,


Ah well

it's going to happen. he's been trying to avoid it for a long times. the powers that runs boxing.

 

[Majestic Pape]

It's not just the number of rounds he won, it's the points in those rounds

It's a robbery because the winner was clear similar to this figh where the
winner was clear

And what point in what rounds? Every round was 10-9, there were no knockdowns or dominant rounds, certainly not for JMM.

The only gain JMM had was that he lost the first two fights which also could have went his way and he was an underdog, which clouded the opinion of casual viewers such as yourself.

edit: didn't see your edit.

 

[Lavish]

 

[Cole Cash]

to be fair, its not like you really watch any other fighter, so i dont see how youd care either way.

 

[Lavish]

to be fair, its not like you really watch any other fighter, so i dont see how youd care either way.

Yet I happened to watch this fight in question

 

[sm0ke]

It's not just the number of rounds he won, it's the points in those rounds

It's a robbery because the winner was clear similar to this figh where the winner was clear

Don't ask me to tell u in points bc I really don't remember

the fukk are you talking about?

how is Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Marquez III - CompuBox Stats <<< THAT anywhere near the "clarity" of who won in tonight's fight? pacquiao landed more punches and more power punches against marquez at a slightly worse percentage. it was CLOSE.

 

[Kings County]

everyone in sports at the top level is on PEDS. Period. That includes mayweather.

he takes the test willingly everytime stfu
may been fighting the same way for 20 years good defense not a power puncher

 

[TheGregReaper]

 

[Formerly known as...]

I really dont care either. Marquez whooped manny last time round so this is just karma