Arab Woman regret starting the Uncommitted Movement..

[Ezekiel 25:17]

@Robbie3000 and @Ezekiel 25:17

We need answers. What’s the next move ?

Democrats come back better in 2028 if they want to win. They negotiate with blacks, Hispanics, and white women.

 

[Marlow Stanfield]

it's what they wanted.

 

[Jx2]

This last week made me even more cynical of my fellow Americans. It was already at an all time high

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

Those dumb asses we’re warned… foh now and hold ya own nuts

 

[Dr. Acula]

That was an idiotic video.

The uncommitted movement was a warning to the democrats about facilitating a genocide. If they wanted uncommitted votes, stop arming israel. Biden chose not to and the Dems thought they could win without uncommitted votes. They didn't.

I don't blame them, I blame biden for being a retard and the Dems for being arrogant.

One things you dudes ignore is that tbh, the democrats had to worry about scaring off in the jew votes. Arabs aren't the only minority population in the US. What is done is done though. Like I said these politicians aren't going to hurt as much as average everyday voter and their "warning" has resulted in them actually not only in a worse position for the Palestinians but for Arabs here in the US as well. If that is what they want cool. But when they get denaturalized and life becomes harder for them here in the US, if you voted for it or voted for third party or sat out, better not cry and eat that shyt.

You can care about Palestinians, in the middle east, but those who think like that dumb broad in the OP are forgetting you probably should worry about your wellbeing in the states as well. One candidate, I'd argued you probably could have gotten concessions out of, not total abandonment of Israel however. The other candidate you will get the same result or worse on this issue but now they are set on personally making your life a living hell here where you actually live. Their only hope now is that Trump makes s a liar out of us but I doubt it, based on what he has stated himself.

 

[Da_Eggman]

That was an idiotic video.

The uncommitted movement was a warning to the democrats about facilitating a genocide. If they wanted uncommitted votes, stop arming israel. Biden chose not to and the Dems thought they could win without uncommitted votes. They didn't.

I don't blame them, I blame biden for being a retard and the Dems for being arrogant.

have fun

 

[Ozymandeas]

They are in the same exact position they were with that ole decrepit warlord.

Atleast now they don’t have to deal with being lied to about ceasefires and they can move accordingly.

Vote for someone that banned you from coming to the country brehs

this is why most of the middle east arab countries have gone through some type of conflict this past 50 years

arabs are too temperamental and emotional

Their IQs have to be in the 60s.

I hope Trump puts the Muslim Ban back into effect immediately just so I can laugh at their stupidity.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

One things you dudes ignore is that tbh, the democrats had to worry about scaring off in the jew votes. Arabs aren't the only minority population in the US. What is done is done though. Like I said these politicians aren't going to hurt as much as average everyday voter and their "warning" has resulted in them actually not only in a worse position for the Palestinians but for Arabs here in the US as well. If that is what they want cool. But when they get denaturalized and life becomes harder for them here in the US, if you voted for it or voted for third party or sat out, better not cry and eat that shyt.

You can care about Palestinians, in the middle east, but those who think like that dumb broad in the OP are forgetting you probably should worry about your wellbeing in the states as well. One candidate, I'd argued you probably could have gotten concessions out of, not total abandonment of Israel however. The other candidate you will get the same result or worse on this issue but now they are set on personally making your life a living hell here where you actually live. Their only hope now is that Trump makes s a liar out of us but I doubt it, based on what he has stated himself.

thing is, this was an Arab revolt too, not just a Palestinian one. Thats whats so duplicitous about this. This went from palestinians, to muslims to all Arabs now? Like…this runaway issue capture is a slap in the face at how much these supporters lied to justify their pivot.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

We Jamaicans have a saying…
“Ears can’t hear then bottom must feel”
Essentially if you don’t listen consequences will be swift and violent.
These abstention votes are always counterproductive. Now people of Arabic/muslim ancestry will be spending money in the courts to avoid deportation, keep their businesses and jobs, and prosecute the crackers who attack them.
Pitiful.

a whoah

rahtid

 

[Seoul Gleou]

have fun

You defend rapists

I dont know what your idea of fun is. But ion want it

 

[BaggerofTea]

this is why most of the middle east arab countries have gone through some type of conflict this past 50 years

arabs are too temperamental and emotional

Exactly, and too goddamn arrogant and egotistical

 

[the cac mamba]

One things you dudes ignore is that tbh, the democrats had to worry about scaring off in the jew votes. Arabs aren't the only minority population in the US.

they don't care about that. these fukking idiots can't move off the democrat primary; they think the nationwide electoral college is dearborn, michigan

and we saw how it worked out on tuesday

 

[Seoul Gleou]

One things you dudes ignore is that tbh, the democrats had to worry about scaring off in the jew votes. Arabs aren't the only minority population in the US. What is done is done though. Like I said these politicians aren't going to hurt as much as average everyday voter and their "warning" has resulted in them actually not only in a worse position for the Palestinians but for Arabs here in the US as well. If that is what they want cool. But when they get denaturalized and life becomes harder for them here in the US, if you voted for it or voted for third party or sat out, better not cry and eat that shyt.

You can care about Palestinians, in the middle east, but those who think like that dumb broad in the OP are forgetting you probably should worry about your wellbeing in the states as well. One candidate, I'd argued you probably could have gotten concessions out of, not total abandonment of Israel however. The other candidate you will get the same result or worse on this issue but now they are set on personally making your life a living hell here where you actually live. Their only hope now is that Trump makes s a liar out of us but I doubt it, based on what he has stated himself.

You're making this more complicated than it needs to be and made some antisemitic assumptions.

Not all Jews are zionists and not all zionists are Jews. There are more Christian zionists than Jewish ones in America and they vote Republican. The dems would've lost nothing from calling for an embargo and to bush Netanyahu. In fact, they would've actually gained votes, if anything.

Arab, Muslim, AND progressives voted uncommitted, and I can't believe i need to remind people, to stop a genocide we are funding. That was their one and only goal.

The democrats chose to ignore them, ignore international law, and laws here at home. That is on them, not the people who wouldn't support them.

This take my ball home reaction so called democrat voters have is childish. You guys were okay with a fukking genocide and voted to support the people doing it instead of telling them to end it. If those people are capable of that, they are capable of supporting a foreign version of Trump, did you really think they'd treat you differently? You'd be rewarding them for evil shyt.

You asked people to choose between one of two evils and vote to see their relatives killed. They said no and you're mad at them.

The real fear is that one of those two evils will do to America what America does to other countries. And that's a valid fear. But say that and be honest with yourselves instead of blaming people that chose neither evil.

Because if were rationalizing evil, then Trump is a necessary evil. His presidency will force people to take seriously the liberties and rights they took for granted and be more civically engaged.

Also, they won't be the only ones that suffer, we all will. So saying theyll get deported or whatever and trying to separate their tragedy from yours is divorced from reality. And all of this, at least from arab, muslim, and progressives voters, could've been avoided if Joe Biden simply stopped sending billions of our money to kill women and children. He chose to do that over the future of his country. He and the democrats are to blame.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Lesser of evil is a terrible fukn argument though.

Y'all want to bring up the Civil Rights? Our real leaders went through REAL PAIN to achieve that. They did not take the 'lesser of two evils' Meanwhile nikkahs today to scared to sit out one election

Sometimes in life you have to take risks for the greater good. It is what it is. Come 2028 Democrats will be tougher.

The argument against the "lesser of two evils" misunderstands both history and our present reality. The only thing you're right about is that leaders of the Civil Rights Movement endured immense pain and risk to achieve progress. However, they didn't do it by sitting on their hands. They understood the stakes, strategically organized, and used EVERY tool available to them, INCLUDING voting, to mitigate harm and push for real change. To claim that Black people today are "too scared" to sit out one election ignores the reality of those who stand to lose the most when regressive forces amass power. Sitting out, even as a so-called risk for the greater good, cedes power to those intent on erasing ANY and ALL gains made from those sacrifices.

We also know which party actively pursues policies to suppress votes in Black communities, undermine reproductive rights, roll back environmental protections, undermine the labor movement, and appoint extremist judges who will affect policy for decades. That is why it is silly to try to conflate incremental progress with active harm. It is a false equivalency. I'm not going to lie, it is frustrating that progress is slow and often compromised, but the other end to that is the accelerated unraveling of rights from the party that is openly hostile to fundamental freedoms. Claiming a moral high ground by sitting out ignores that elections determine who governs, who appoints judges, and who enforces *or* dismantles protections for the most vulnerable communities.

There is no cowardice in choosing to vote as a tactical move. It recognizes that there are real stakes, that incremental gains can pave the way for broader reforms, and that sitting on your hands and ceding more power to those who actively seek harm only entrenches oppression. The Civil Rights Movement didn't succeed by waiting for the perfect solution. It succeeded by fighting tooth and nail for every possible gain, knowing that even imperfect allies could be pushed toward justice. Sitting out an election isn't taking a bold risk, it's surrendering the fight entirely to those who would gladly undo every hard-won victory. Inaction isn't action.

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

The argument against the "lesser of two evils" misunderstands both history and our present reality. The only thing you're right about is that leaders of the Civil Rights Movement endured immense pain and risk to achieve progress. However, they didn't do it by sitting on their hands. They understood the stakes, strategically organized, and used EVERY tool available to them, INCLUDING voting, to mitigate harm and push for real change. To claim that Black people today are "too scared" to sit out one election ignores the reality of those who stand to lose the most when regressive forces amass power. Sitting out, even as a so-called risk for the greater good, cedes power to those intent on erasing those ANY and ALL gains made from those sacrifices.

We also know which party actively pursues policies to suppress votes in Black communities, undermine reproductive rights, roll back environmental protections, undermine the labor movement, and appoint extremist judges who will affect policy for decades. That is why it is silly to try to conflate incremental progress with active harm. It is a false equivalency. I'm not going to lie, it is frustrating that progress is slow and often compromised, but the other end to that is the accelerated unraveling of rights from the party that is openly hostile to fundamental freedoms. Claiming a moral high ground by sitting out ignores that elections determine who governs, who appoints judges, and who enforces *or* dismantles protections for the most vulnerable communities.

There is no cowardice in choosing to vote as a tactical move. It recognizes that there are real stakes, that incremental gains can pave the way for broader reforms, and that sitting on your hands and ceding more power to those who actively seek harm only entrenches oppression. The Civil Rights Movement didn't succeed by waiting for the perfect solution. It succeeded by fighting tooth and nail for every possible gain, knowing that even imperfect allies could be pushed toward justice. Sitting out an election isn't taking a bold risk, it's surrendering the fight entirely to those who would gladly undo every hard-won victory. Inaction isn't action.

Well the Democrats lost. So much for voting just because.

Voting for the lesser of two evils got a con man elected twice.