It's a convenience argument.
They want to be sexual and provocative on their terms. But they act like they can operate in a vacuum and that their actions have no impact on anyone around them.
"I'm gonna dress like a hoe, but if you get the impression that I'm a hoe....that's on you. I have no idea why you would think that"
It's also a childish resentment of biological gender differences. Yes men and women are different. They are more alike than they are different, but the differences are important.
Many of these differences are sexually related and these women have internalized negative ideas about female sexuality which causes them to mimic male sexuality to overcome the negativity associated with female sexuality which has been produced by male misunderstandings of women.
So you have a group of women who have been told by stupid men that being emotional is weak or negative. They believe this because of their own insecurities but socially codify these beliefs and now it's "a thing" in our society.
Welp the women are all like "damn I don't want to be weak or dismissed so I'll show those stupid men! Ha! I can fukk around just like you can!"
Hence you get a bunch of women with multiple partners who have bought into a very male belief that emotional attachment weakens you.
Meanwhile they should've evaluated the original assumption instead of accepting it, b/c for me the emotional connection and mental context is actually what intensifies the sexual act for most women...(I.e why romance novels are more popular with women than porn and why even female porn looks a lil different than male porn).
The impact doesn't even enter into the equation for men or for women. Just stupid people doing stupid shyt.
Disclaimer: no all men and women aren't the same. But there are patterns that can be seen in male and female behavior.