AOC’s Plan to End Deepfake Porn
- Thread starter bnew
- Start date
WPIX New York City, NY
Florida teacher accused of using students’ yearbook photos for AI-generated child porn
Rachel Tucker
Wed, March 20, 2024 at 11:19 AM EDT·1 min read
TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) – A teacher at a Christian school in Florida was arrested Tuesday after he was accused of using yearbook photos of students to create AI-generated child pornography.
Steven Houser, 67, works as a third-grade science teacher at Beacon Christian Academy in New Port Richey, according to the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office (PCSO).
St. Pete man left paralyzed after ride in police van files lawsuit against city
The sheriff’s office opened an investigation after receiving a tip about Houser. In a news release, PCSO said Houser had “two photos and three videos featuring child pornography” in his possession. The sheriff’s office said none of the media contained any students at the school.
Steven Houser (Pasco County Sheriff’s Office)
Deputies found that Houser had AI-generated child pornography, which he admitted to creating with three student yearbook photos, according to PCSO.
“This is a new kind of way to exploit children. It’s not an avenue that you typically look into when you are looking at children being exploited. It is worrisome. It’s scary,” said Pasco County parent Rebecca Yuengling, who is unrelated to the three students.
The sheriff’s office said it hasn’t received any reports of additional victims.
Yuengling is looking to state lawmakers for answers. “We’re gonna have to … ask the legislators to be very tough on this,” she said. “Not a slap on the hand.”
Houser had returned this week to the classroom as a part-time teacher after taking a year off from teaching. School staff said all teachers must undergo background checks and that Houser had been cleared to teach.
Anyone who believes they may be a victim is asked to PCSO Crime Tips Line at 1-800-706-2488, or report tips online at the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office website.
Fits the typical description of these pedo's.
Havent followed AI much, but once they have an offline AI model its all over and these cacs will run amock and never get caught.
He better not see the outside ever again.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
that's very disturbing
NYChase718
Veteran
Probly because shes the cacs go to
They have a bunch of deepfakes of aoc
They have a bunch of deepfakes of aoc
TrapHouse Rock
All Star
the remix is classic
cyndaquil
Lv 100 Bold natured
This one seems personal
Of all the things affecting us today AI porn is at the bottom of the list for most
Of all the things affecting us today AI porn is at the bottom of the list for most
I'm all for this getting regulated and punishable
Celebs dealing with it is one thing. There is a relative price of fame and they have lawyers and resources, but regular people who get caught up in this because of some petty, hateful revenge type thing is some pretty awful shyt.
The technology can get out of control fast and making "custom" porn with real people needs to be punishable IMO
Celebs dealing with it is one thing. There is a relative price of fame and they have lawyers and resources, but regular people who get caught up in this because of some petty, hateful revenge type thing is some pretty awful shyt.
The technology can get out of control fast and making "custom" porn with real people needs to be punishable IMO
X Sues to Block California Election Deepfake Law 'In Conflict' With First Amendment
X sued to block a new California law that would require platforms to censor deepfakes about politicians in the lead up to an election
www.thewrap.com
X Sues to Block California Election Deepfake Law ‘In Conflict’ With First Amendment
The lawsuit claims AB 2655 “will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech”
Sean Burch
November 15, 2024 @ 8:06 AM
X sued to block a new California law that would require social media platforms to censor “materially deceptive content,” aka deepfakes, about politicians in the lead up to an election.
The company, owned by Elon Musk, claimed in its Thursday court filling the new law would trample the First Amendment, as well as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives social platforms the broad legal immunity to moderate content however they see fit.
“It is difficult to imagine a statute more in conflict with core First Amendment principles,” the lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of California Federal Court, said.
The new law in question, Assembly Bill 2655, which has been dubbed the “Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024,” would require platforms like X to remove “inauthentic, fake, or false” content of politicians 120 days before an election. Platforms would also have to “develop procedures” that allow California residents to file complaints about altered content, and would also require platforms to “label certain additional content inauthentic.”
AB 2655 is set to go into effect next year.
“This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary and will limit the type of ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open’ ‘debate on public issues’ that core First Amendment protections are designed to ensure,” X’s lawsuit said, while citing the 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan case.
The new law, the lawsuit added, would impose “unintelligible prohibitions” on political speech,”greatly incentivizing covered platforms to censor all content that
could reasonably fall within the statute’s purview to avoid substantial enforcement costs.” This will “lead to censorship at the direction of the State,” the lawsuit said, due to AB2655’s “draconian and one-sided” provisions.
If this sounds familiar, that’s because a California judge blocked a similar anti-deepfake law last month, two weeks after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it into law. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez agreed with Musk that the law, which prohibited the “distribution of materially deceptive audio or visual media of a candidate” within two months of an election, unless the post included a disclosure that the content was a deepfake, went too far.
Mendez said the law, AB2839, gave legislators “unbridled license to bulldoze over the longstanding tradition of critique, parody, and satire protected by the First Amendment.”
The CIA needs to do what they do and straighten this boer outX Sues to Block California Election Deepfake Law 'In Conflict' With First Amendment
X sued to block a new California law that would require platforms to censor deepfakes about politicians in the lead up to an election
X Sues to Block California Election Deepfake Law ‘In Conflict’ With First Amendment
The lawsuit claims AB 2655 “will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech”
(CREDIT: Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images for The New York Times)
Sean Burch
November 15, 2024 @ 8:06 AM
X sued to block a new California law that would require social media platforms to censor “materially deceptive content,” aka deepfakes, about politicians in the lead up to an election.
The company, owned by Elon Musk, claimed in its Thursday court filling the new law would trample the First Amendment, as well as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives social platforms the broad legal immunity to moderate content however they see fit.
“It is difficult to imagine a statute more in conflict with core First Amendment principles,” the lawsuit, filed in the Eastern District of California Federal Court, said.
The new law in question, Assembly Bill 2655, which has been dubbed the “Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024,” would require platforms like X to remove “inauthentic, fake, or false” content of politicians 120 days before an election. Platforms would also have to “develop procedures” that allow California residents to file complaints about altered content, and would also require platforms to “label certain additional content inauthentic.”
AB 2655 is set to go into effect next year.
“This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary and will limit the type of ‘uninhibited, robust, and wide-open’ ‘debate on public issues’ that core First Amendment protections are designed to ensure,” X’s lawsuit said, while citing the 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan case.
The new law, the lawsuit added, would impose “unintelligible prohibitions” on political speech,”greatly incentivizing covered platforms to censor all content that
could reasonably fall within the statute’s purview to avoid substantial enforcement costs.” This will “lead to censorship at the direction of the State,” the lawsuit said, due to AB2655’s “draconian and one-sided” provisions.
If this sounds familiar, that’s because a California judge blocked a similar anti-deepfake law last month, two weeks after California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed it into law. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez agreed with Musk that the law, which prohibited the “distribution of materially deceptive audio or visual media of a candidate” within two months of an election, unless the post included a disclosure that the content was a deepfake, went too far.
Mendez said the law, AB2839, gave legislators “unbridled license to bulldoze over the longstanding tradition of critique, parody, and satire protected by the First Amendment.”
is this before or after they stop online piracy
!!!!
Piffiztheanswer
L'immortale
.50 Cal right between the eyes of this mutated inbred boer fakkitThe CIA needs to do what they do and straighten this boer out
