#666gang civil war it is then
.
Everyone doesn't have to think like me. I do demand that people actually think though. Holding opinions is not "thinking" as those opinions should be rooted in some defensible logic. If not that person is capable of being manipulated to believe almost anything and that is dangerous to me and brehs at large.
In short all opinions are not equal.
All to often on here when pressed for an argument you find that people have none.
Example:
Trump invited known White Supremacists / Racists / Anti-Blacks Gorka, Miller and Bannon into his inner-circle to design strategy and policy including rolling back affirmative action.
Bannon and Miller in particular waged and are waging a structural and cultural war in the name of Trump against the black diaspora in particular.
1. How do you rationalize that away?
Quite aside from that you have all the less-direct nods to the notions of white superiority and darker-people's inferiority, but we will deal with that later.
Suffice to say as a #666breh you must be aware of the damage the change of policy and the fostering of those attitudes has on the day-to-day life of the professional breh. You must be aware of how those attitudes hinder the progression of many who aspire to do more within the American system AND abroad.
But I want to stick with 1. for now. How do you rationalize that away?
If it is a case of " am ok fukk everyone else" then hey .. there in obvious and expected consequence of that.
As a #666breh no reductive post reduction focus please. Arguments from principles. No "whataboutism", no "question dodging". Thanks
NB:
"expose", "hate", "liberal" and all the other unsubstantiated sheep-isms will be ignored.