ANYONE WITH ANY SEMBLANCE OF BASKETBALL KNOWLEDGE KNOWS THAT INGRAM AND LONZO ARE FAR MORE VALUABLE PIECES THAN KUZMA...
BUT AFTER REPORTS SURFACED THAT WE VALUED KUZMA TOO MUCH TO INCLUDE HIM IN THE TRADE, IT GOT ME WONDERING...
DID WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SWAP OUT INGRAM OR LONZO FOR KUZMA IN THE TRADE?
OR WAS NEW ORLEANS’ FRONT OFFICE SIMPLY SMART TO THE POINT WHERE THEY VALUED LONZO AND INGRAM THE MOST??
REALLY HOPE ITS THE LATTER.. IF WE COULDA TRADED KUZMA INSTEAD, THE DECISION NOT TO WOULD BE AN EPIC MISTAKE.. AND I LIKE KUZMA, BUT HIS POTENTIAL IS CLEARLY LIMITED IN COMPARISON TO THE OTHER 2.
WHATS THE OFFICIAL WORD ON THIS??