I have the opposite view. I feel like we should be able to evaluate the message separate from the messenger. If Trump told you to eat healthy, exercise and educate yourself, we can all objectively agree it's a positive message from a pos human being. But just because he's a pos, would you then not follow the advice out of spite?
I guess what I'm trying to say is that you don't have to dikkride someone just to agree with them on a certain point they made. If the information given makes sense, absorb it and separate it from the messenger.
At a point, if you wanted to become a great chess player, you might have had to study some Bobby Fischer games eventhough he was an alleged racist.
TheColi is funny man.
Black Lives Matter has said MOUNTAINS of motivating things to black people and have accomplished effective positive work for the black community as a whole and fighting racism in America. But theColi unanimously eats up Candace Owens-conservative think tank propaganda that they are an EXPOSED liberal coalitions of gay activists trying to insert lgbtq and poc activism into black power while making money off of black people's death. Or some crazy c00nservative coli nikka shyt like that.
Democrats and those who identify as liberals have said MOUNTAINS of motivating things to black people and have accomplished effective, positive laws for the black community. And I sure don't have to tell you nikkas here don't jump over each other to be agreeable with their speeches and words. No matter how objectively factual and agreeable they are. Because they are an EXPOSED band of secret racists trying to scam the black community with pandering words according to yall. The messenger sure as fukk matters to yall then.
But when scumbags like Andrew Tate, Donald Trump, or Tariq Nasheed--actual known and proud scammers, criminals, and scummy detestable a$$holes--tell you nikkas to try wiping your ass once in a while suddenly yall turn from skeptical militants into blissful hippies talking about "tHiS a pOsItIvE mEsSaGe tHo. FActs! WUts wRoNg wIt wUt hE sAyIng!?"
Coli contrarians are hilarious man.
The fact you regard this shallow nonsense as "information" being given to humanity, rather than the self-aggrandizing ramblings of a sociopath already shows that you are not openly agreeing with the guy as some type of objective party. You are indeed dikkriding for someone you personally admire.