We know that ancient Kemet was black, and mainstream scholars got their asses kicked so bad by Diop, Obenga, Dr. Ben, Ivan Van Sertima, Keita etc etc so bad in the 1970-1990's that they had to concede in their jounrals and authoritative books that ancient Kemet was of black African origins. The main weapons were anthropology, linguistics, archaeology, and cultural analysis.
1-Basic Database of Nile Valley Studies | Egyptsearch Reloaded
The white boys still to this day cannot override the combination of this overwhelming evidence, and hate the fact that this sat so long uncontested. Their new trick is to racialize haplogroups in genetics (which is a complete fail on their part), by implying if it is "African" or "non African", acting as though the bridge from Africa to Asia magically turns the black Africans leaving Africa white instantly. It's a trick bag, and some people on Egyptsearch have long been debunking that shyt. None the less the most viewed rhetoric of that kind is on white racist genetic sites like anthrogenecia and forum bio-diversity.
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?20298-No-Bantus-or-Niger-Congo-In-Cameroon
It may not be the most exciting thing, but they have a sneaky movement that is gaining ground, and many black people (especially non c00ns) aren't really keeping up with this information. While it's dry and sciency it has to be done, even by layman blacks on the computer all day. The consequences of allowing the Devils to try to say that the old Afrocentric movement information is "dated" because of them deliberately skewing genetic information can be devastating the younger black generation who will evitably see these cocky antagonist Devils trying to deny them a place in history when they present that bs genetic shyt, and the black kid doesn't know what to say. This is one of the consequences of allowing that shyt to stand;
The white supremacist weaponize that information like how Jared Taylor caught Tariq up referencing the study in the link above;
1-Basic Database of Nile Valley Studies | Egyptsearch Reloaded
The white boys still to this day cannot override the combination of this overwhelming evidence, and hate the fact that this sat so long uncontested. Their new trick is to racialize haplogroups in genetics (which is a complete fail on their part), by implying if it is "African" or "non African", acting as though the bridge from Africa to Asia magically turns the black Africans leaving Africa white instantly. It's a trick bag, and some people on Egyptsearch have long been debunking that shyt. None the less the most viewed rhetoric of that kind is on white racist genetic sites like anthrogenecia and forum bio-diversity.
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread.php?20298-No-Bantus-or-Niger-Congo-In-Cameroon
It may not be the most exciting thing, but they have a sneaky movement that is gaining ground, and many black people (especially non c00ns) aren't really keeping up with this information. While it's dry and sciency it has to be done, even by layman blacks on the computer all day. The consequences of allowing the Devils to try to say that the old Afrocentric movement information is "dated" because of them deliberately skewing genetic information can be devastating the younger black generation who will evitably see these cocky antagonist Devils trying to deny them a place in history when they present that bs genetic shyt, and the black kid doesn't know what to say. This is one of the consequences of allowing that shyt to stand;
The white supremacist weaponize that information like how Jared Taylor caught Tariq up referencing the study in the link above;