U just a Kim K soldier. Nothing wrong with that. But don't act like Amber Rose is ugly![]()
:hovehh: She's "coooooooooooooo". If she had hair then she'd be easier to look at, and I'd have a tougher decision.
But without hair....


U just a Kim K soldier. Nothing wrong with that. But don't act like Amber Rose is ugly![]()
I love Amber. She seems so sweet and I'm happy for her and Wiz. Kanye treated her like shyt, smh.
I don't get this mentality
bytch was a stripper who got her come up through Kanye West, was in a bunch of booty shots got another come up and now she's famous.
Women fall at her feet I'm like![]()
Both bytches are flawless. Problem is, you think broke Kanye could even speak to these women? So to me, they are essentially hookers. Selling p*ssy. That's whatever, but there's nothing arousing to me about paying for sex. I say all that to say that as fine as these broads are, they are more like porn smuts to me (KK literally rode a home grown porno flick to fame).
Just judging strictly by their looks: Hookers?Kim K got 2 tv shows, has endless products in Sears and on qvc , does these club appearances for a large fee, not mention she comes from a wealthy family worth millions and she a hooker?
Kim K.
I don't mind Amboo's buzz cut, but it doesn't add. It's not dope. She's dope in SPITE of her hair. Kim K don't look like a fine woman, she looks like a masterful painting of a fine woman.
1 star Kim Kardashian is rich and Amber Rose is a broke bytch.
Edit: that shyt rhymes![]()
This they both look good but Kim got her own money and that gives her a point over amber