Amazon is dangerous - 2023 UPDATE FTC preparing anti trust lawsuit???

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,872
Reputation
4,381
Daps
88,940
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Amazon said the 2018 document listing Carney’s goals to defeat privacy regulation is “out-of-date” and does not reflect the company’s current public-policy objectives. The company said it has opposed “poorly crafted” state privacy bills. It said it would prefer a federal law that “requires transparency about data practices, prohibits the sale of personal data without consent, and ensures that consumers have the right to request access to and delete their personal information.”

:yeshrug:I’m with Amazon on this…
But of course the statist dont want transparency because that would reveal nothing nefarious is going on with the data, ending a profitable narrative.
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,477
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,837
Reppin
NULL
Amazon said the 2018 document listing Carney’s goals to defeat privacy regulation is “out-of-date” and does not reflect the company’s current public-policy objectives. The company said it has opposed “poorly crafted” state privacy bills. It said it would prefer a federal law that “requires transparency about data practices, prohibits the sale of personal data without consent, and ensures that consumers have the right to request access to and delete their personal information.”

:yeshrug:I’m with Amazon on this…
But of course the statist dont want transparency because that would reveal nothing nefarious is going on with the data, ending a profitable narrative.

You know why they're saying this?

Because they know federal law is much easier to water down.

Otherwise a state might pass a more stringent version that might become a model for others.

To be honest for me the privacy issue is less of a concern bc frankly most people really don't care. If giving up your privacy is the cost of using online services, social media most ppl will shrug and hit "Accept these terms." My beef with Amazon is it's business to business practices. A race to the bottom.
 

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,118
Reputation
12,795
Daps
90,580
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
You know why they're saying this?

Because they know federal law is much easier to water down.

Otherwise a state might pass a more stringent version that might become a model for others.

To be honest for me the privacy issue is less of a concern bc frankly most people really don't care. If giving up your privacy is the cost of using online services, social media most ppl will shrug and hit "Accept these terms." My beef with Amazon is it's business to business practices. A race to the bottom.
I think I agree with this take overall, despite me personally hating the loss of privacy
 
Top