I just watched this recently. I never really followed this case when it happened. From what I’ve read, the documentary is biased in her favor and leaves out some factors of why so many people thought she was/is guilty.
That said, the lead detective is a crazy POS and probably has locked up a bunch of innocent people in the past due to his sleaziness and crackpot theories. He actually said “the murderer was a woman, because the body was covered up. A man wouldn’t think to do that”
Seriously, that’s his reasoning? He has some issues with women, he seems repressed or something. His viewpoint seemed to be “she’s a slut, so she’s evil, she did it”. I’m sure there’s stuff that the doc left out, but all the bullshyt the lead detective said is already enough for to seriously question her guilt.
Another thing, I never got the “Foxy Knoxy” label. She is okay looking, nothing more. She was far from “foxy” then and is far from it now.