All 32 starting Qbs ranked into tiers

BlueHeffner

Veteran
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
25,499
Reputation
6,696
Daps
105,199
My boy Romo :wow:



To all the brehs that say rivers should be in tier 1, if thats the case Romo should be tier 1 also. They are pretty much the same player in terms of stats
 

Panther

Byrdgang
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,505
Reputation
3,615
Daps
39,007
Reppin
ByrdGang
Luck dikkriding is outta control... he's not better than Big ben, rivers, or cam

Foles being up that high is funny and hes my qb...
 

AVXL

Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
41,871
Reputation
780
Daps
78,220
Reppin
Of course the ATL
Cam Newton has almost the same stats as Andrew Luck and hes in Top tier but Cam is in tier 3?

:lolshaq:

I see NOTHING wrong with Cam being a Tier 3 QB. You a fanboy if you think he's a top 15 level QB

Luck is a top 10 QB, not top 5. Russ Will is a bit too high

My nikka corn doe :huhldup:
 

Easy-E

TSC's Ric Flair | Heel
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
55,550
Reputation
9,992
Daps
165,004
Reppin
Negativity (Kayfabe)
A former colleague just emailed me this (he's white):

I find it fascinating how narratives of "big data" and "analytics" and "objectivity" are continually employed to give credence to various racist tropes lauding white successes and black failures, even when the actual, objective results suggest strong reality-based counter narratives.

However, any numbers and results that run counter to people's preexisting beliefs and desires never seem to gain much traction...

Try convincing a white dude that Andrew Luck is no better than Cam Newton:

In both sets of value-over-replacement rankings, Luck narrowly places ahead of the Carolina Panthers’ Cam Newton, who makes for a particularly interesting point of comparison. Statistically, the two quarterbacks offered similar production a year ago, but their reputations couldn’t be more different. Luck is widely known as a “winner“; Newton has been dogged by criticism as a “stat-padder” who doesn’t deliver in big moments. Those sentiments probably played a large role when Sando’s execs placed Newton in the third tier despite having a quantitative résumé similar to Luck’s.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/how-good-is-andrew-luck/
Don't forget;

Further, Sando’s scouts are probably the same people who regarded Luck as “the top quarterback prospect to come along in the past 30 years” when he was at Stanford. Research in psychology has shown that it’s incredibly difficult to alter people’s first impressions, so it might have taken a Ryan Leaf-esque flop for scouts to change their opinions about Luck’s potential superstardom.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,838
Reputation
6,222
Daps
108,167
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
Ranked worse than Fitz, Locker and a few other notable names though? The worst starting QB in the NFL though?

:patrice::patrice::patrice:


Had the lowest rating of any starting QB in the league. 66.5 Also threw 21 interceptions to 12 touchdowns.

Before Locker was injured for the season he had 8 touchdown passes in 7 games and a rating of 86.7

and Fitzpatrick had 14 - 12 interceptions and an 82.0 rating.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
11,402
Reputation
660
Daps
21,216
Reppin
D[M]V
Who the fukk is Brian Hoyer? :mjlol:

I hate these QB tier talk shyt.. :dead:

All it involves is "My QB is better than your favorite teams QB" .. "Insert stats from ESPN.com".. Rinse and Repeat. :shaq2:
 
Top