Man go watch the first season of true detectiveYour boys must be cacs. Idk who this heifer is.
seriously...fukk this thread.Your boys must be cacs. Idk who this heifer is.
Googled her. All totaled, she is a 4.8 roughly when not dolled up, and goes up to a 5.3 or so when she is.
Not ugly, not insanely attractive, not sexually attractive (I only saw pictures, motion can change things.)
Shes better than staring at nothing, but shes not lighting any fires.
Edit:Her titties are a ten. Shape, and nipple to areola ratio are on point.
My personal thoughts on her. I could rate her higher if for no other reason than she is not fat, which is pretty common outside of show business.
if this chick represents women who were 4.8 to 5.3, then the world would be an infinitely better place
Yeah she's better looking.My personal thoughts on her. I could rate her higher if for no other reason than she is not fat, which is pretty common outside of show business.
However, she doesn't strike me in any particular way, especially not as much as the other chick posted Adelaide Kane
The above is fukking 9+. Comparatively speaking, I see nothing too special about Alexandra. She might be one of those "Wear me down as I see her more" types but she really
isn't too special. I will agree, however, she would be a huge upgrade over most women walking aroundBut thats also cause I don't find the majority of women attractive.