the issue isn't just "outside money" steering the outcomeThe argument she made is against outside money flooding into congressional races with the goal of steering the outcome.
I pointed out she has her on PAC that does that exact thing.
Her group is a SIG, you just align with it and therefore view it as benign.
As far as the strawman, you presented the idea that AIPAC and UDP are different because they are the propaganda arm of an apartheid state government. This was not introduced in her criticism and these are two claims you’ve made and attacked that no one else presented nor argued.
I understand the reason for it's inclusion to strengthen your argument, but it's largely out of scope.
simplifying it to that is pretty nasty distillation - AIPAC is literally affiliated with a foreign government -
and it certainly does not fall outside of the scope