Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
like did he start shytting on his own people
Or did he just keep it against Jews so they were happy?
Or did he just keep it against Jews so they were happy?
Damnthe Nazis enjoyed fairly broad public support until the Reich started losing the war,(of course they had thrown most serious political opposition in the camps, jail or exile by the start of WWII).
Maybe look deeper than a random comment on an anonymous message board. The Nazi's won the Reichstag with only 32% of the vote...and were largely supported by disaffected WW1 vets who were easy to quickly organize and deploy against the rest of Germany (who they blamed for sabotaging WW1). It's impossible to tell how genuine the support was throughout the 30's because they immediately implemented a police state and started stomping out all resistance. It stands to reason, though, that the fact that they had to deploy secret police, concentration camps, vast propaganda, etc. they did't have the latent support that outside appearances might have given. It's like looking at all of North Korea almost comically howling in the streets when Kim Jong Il died as evidence that they supported him and weren't just terrified that their family (or entire neighborhood) would be sent away to prison camp if they didn't make a large enough display of support.Damn
Not looking good for the U.S then
/threadTrump is a fukking clown...the Nazi's weren't. They were evil and capable.
Maybe look deeper than a random comment on an anonymous message board. The Nazi's won the Reichstag with only 32% of the vote...and were largely supported by disaffected WW1 vets who were easy to quickly organize and deploy against the rest of Germany who they blamed for sabotaging WW1. It's impossible to tell how genuine the support was throughout the 30's because they immediately implemented a police state and started stomping out all resistance. It stands to reason, though, that the fact that they had to deploy secret police, concentration camps, vast propaganda, etc. they did't have the latent support that outside appearances might have given. It's like looking at all of North Korea almost comically howling in the streets when Kim Jong Il died as evidence that they supported him and weren't just terrified that their family (or entire neighborhood) would be sent away to prison camp if they didn't make a large enough display of support.
No matter how big of an a$$hole Trump is, comparing him to the Nazi's is, frankly, disrespectful to the Nazi's ability to seize power in Germany. Trump is a fukking clown...the Nazi's weren't. They were evil and capable. Within the first year of Hitler's Chancellorship they had outlawed all political parties and imprisoned all significant political opponents....we're nowhere close to that thankfully. Hell, we're about to have an election. There were no more elections in Germany after 1932.
Real shyt.
And the next "Trump" won't be nearly as much of a buffoon.
Hopefully there are elections after 2020.Maybe look deeper than a random comment on an anonymous message board. The Nazi's won the Reichstag with only 32% of the vote...and were largely supported by disaffected WW1 vets who were easy to quickly organize and deploy against the rest of Germany who they blamed for sabotaging WW1. It's impossible to tell how genuine the support was throughout the 30's because they immediately implemented a police state and started stomping out all resistance. It stands to reason, though, that the fact that they had to deploy secret police, concentration camps, vast propaganda, etc. they did't have the latent support that outside appearances might have given. It's like looking at all of North Korea almost comically howling in the streets when Kim Jong Il died as evidence that they supported him and weren't just terrified that their family (or entire neighborhood) would be sent away to prison camp if they didn't make a large enough display of support.
No matter how big of an a$$hole Trump is, comparing him to the Nazi's is, frankly, disrespectful to the Nazi's ability to seize power in Germany. Trump is a fukking clown...the Nazi's weren't. They were evil and capable. Within the first year of Hitler's Chancellorship they had outlawed all political parties and imprisoned all significant political opponents....we're nowhere close to that thankfully. Hell, we're about to have an election. There were no more elections in Germany after 1932.
To be fair America has a strong democratic tradition sharpened by the recent history of the civil rights struggle, The German Reich at that time in history under the Weimar Republic did not and was thus much more fragile and vulnerable to Extremist groups such as the Nazis who were much better organized than either the Social Democrats or Communists or non Nazi Conservatives who were the main opposition to them.Damn
Not looking good for the U.S then
i think the most important lesson we can take from that time is what happened with the left in Germany. The Communists, Democratic Socialists, and more traditional Progressives all hated and distrusted eachother, which allowed the Nazi’s to pick them off one by one.To be fair America has a strong democratic tradition sharpened by the recent history of the civil rights struggle, The German Reich at that time in history under the Weimar Republic did not and was thus much more fragile and vulnerable to Extremist groups such as the Nazis who were much better organized than either the Social Democrats or Communists or non Nazi Conservatives who were the main opposition to them.
Not the same situation...Damn
Not looking good for the U.S then
To be fair America has a strong democratic tradition sharpened by the recent history of the civil rights struggle, The German Reich at that time in history under the Weimar Republic did not and was thus much more fragile and vulnerable to Extremist groups such as the Nazis who were much better organized than either the Social Democrats or Communists or non Nazi Conservatives who were the main opposition to them.