Essential Afro-Latino/ Caribbean Current Events

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
6,991
Daps
80,027
Reppin
BaBylon
A-Carribean-China.jpg

2 November 2020

Chinese Presence in the Caribbean, New Global Power Encroaching on US Hegemony?


Many analysts have been closely watching the growth of Chinese naval power and its increasing presence across both the Indian and Pacific oceans, collectively known as the Indo-Pacific region. What is less talked about however is the Caribbean region, which, in its turn, is not an exception – it is also a stage for Chinese-US competition.

Under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Beijing is willing to also deepen its military ties with Caribbean nations in such areas as disaster relief, peacekeeping etc. Caribbean countries such as Trinidad and Tobago, as well as Barbados, have been sending their military officers to China for training – which sometimes includes Chinese language and culture. Currently, in terms of military presence, China has no United Nations troops in Latin America, but in March 2019 Beijing deployed over 100 Chinese soldiers to deliver humanitarian aid in Venezuela.

Regarding Chinese economic presence, there are parallels between Chinese aid to Pacific Island countries and its aid policy in the Caribbean. It is effectively grants and loans with a focus on infrastructure.

Such investments and loans are also accompanied by a more aggressive public diplomacy campaign which has been championing China’s supposedly benevolent role in the Global South, especially since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak. For example, Beijing has pledged a $1 billion loan to Caribbean and Latin American nations to help them to procure a vaccine, and has also joined the COVID-19 mass vaccination program of the World Health Organization, unlike the US.

Speaking of diplomacy, Chinese investment in Caribbean countries seems to be tied to their recognition of the “One China” principle (as is the case with the Pacific). In September 2019, for instance, Chinese commerce official Wang Xiaoyang stated that Beijing could provide Haiti with “interest-free loans” as well as “concession loans”, as long as Haitian officials could “uphold the One China principle”. In spite of Chinese advancements, Haiti is still one of the 15 nations that recognizes independent Taiwan. In March 2020, Haiti expelled the Taiwanese ambassador over what was supposedly a small incident.



Source: InfoBrics

Similarly, the Dominican Republic’s recognition of Beijing, while breaking off relations with Taiwan in May, paved the way for Chinese-Dominican cooperation which includes a Chinese $10 billion infrastructure investment plan.

Gaining support for the One China principle in the diplomatic arena is clearly one of Beijing’s goals behind its growing presence in the Caribbean, but, in the long run, it is part of a wider Chinese long-term geopolitical strategy. The “CELAC and China Joint Plan of Action for Cooperation on Priority Areas 2019-2021” document, for instance, clearly shows Beijing´s intentions to extend its relations with the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) way beyond development and trade: it seeks to further strengthen Chinese-Caribbean ties in the fields of culture, science, and security as well, thus deepening political relationships in different spheres – at regional, and also sub-regional levels.


In 2016, China’s Policy Paper on Latin America and the Caribbean noted that China is to “actively carry out military exchanges and cooperation with Latin American and Caribbean countries,” as well as seeking “maritime cooperation”. China certainly aspires to secure its strategic access in the long run to resources such as bauxite and oil; it also seeks to secure trade routes to the US, which is, afterall, Beijing’s largest customer.

Being the second-largest economy in the world after the US, China actively builds up its naval power. According to the IISS, from 2014 to 2018, China launched naval vessels equivalent to the total number of ships serving in the navies of Germany, India, Spain, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. Now China’s navy is now one the largest one in the world in terms of ship numbers (considered around 330 vs. the US 300). Beijing certainly aspires to further project is naval power globally; however, the US Navy still is the dominant global force in the seas. For China, in fact, there could be some challenges to be faced in becoming a global naval power as Beijing already has a huge funding burden, and is behind the US in anti-submarine warfare or aircraft carriers, for example. But China is working hard to catch up.

All of the above clearly concerns Washington. American dominance in the Caribbean, particularly, became total after the Treaty of Paris (1898) when the US “legalized” its annexation of Puerto Rico and Cuba came to be under their tutelage. That was the final nail in the coffin of what was once the Spanish mare nostrum. The United States might have lost Cuba in 1953, but the Caribbean has to large extent in fact remained an American zone of influence.

Could this be starting to change?

Although there was a period of relative disengagement by Washington in Latin America, the US has been struggling to reassert its hegemony in the face of growing Chinese presence. Some analysts describe such competition as a new cold war. And Venezuela is a hot spot in this “war”. Iranian oil tankers have been crossing the Caribbean sea and entering Venezuela’s waters. They do so without American intervention probably due to Beijing’s backing as China has thrown its full diplomatic support to both Iran and Venezuela and has been very outspoken both against the return of UN sanctions on Iran and against the US oil “embargo” on Venezuela.

Cuba too might come to be in the spotlight in the near future. In recent years Chinese-Cuban cooperation has increased significantly. In October 2018 National Defense Minister Wei Fenghe and Cuban Minister of the Armed Forces Cintra Frias pledged to deepen both countries’ military ties. And in 2018 satellite images showed a new surveillance radome on the Bejucal Cuban base – such can be used for missile tracking, and signals interception. According to some reports, these are the signs of some Chinese military presence there.

As another example of the so-called “new cold war”, the US has been militarizing the Caribbean Sea to encircle Venezuela, and they also compete with China for influence in both Guyana and Suriname in light of recent major oil discoveries.

Such dispute involves the realm of discourse. In this context, Barbados’ recent drive to remove Queen Elizabeth as its Head of State (the country joined BRI last year) has also been blamed on China by Tom Tugendhat, the chairman of the British Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Select Committee. He accused China of using “infrastructure investment and debt diplomacy” to pressure Barbados into making such move – even though there has been a public opinion turn towards Republicanism in Barbados for over 15 years. This can be interpreted as part of a narrative war. The fact that China is lending billions of dollars to other Caribbean Commonwealth nations – these are nations who still have the British monarch as their Head of State – has certainly prompted concern amid British and Western political elites.

To sum it up, China’s increasing presence in the Caribbean serves many purposes and is yet another example of its rise to the status of a new global superpower, a process that has been going on for some years. If China’s geostrategic and economic interests in Latin America advance further, the need for a naval presence might also arise. So maybe in the near future we will hear of Chinese plans for a naval base in the Caribbean like the one in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. The truth is that the US cannot afford to any longer take the Caribbean as their own backyard for granted.

Link:

Chinese presence in the Caribbean is yet another sign of its growing global power
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Ralph Gonsalves’ ULP Re-Elected in St. Vincent & the Grenadines

screen_shot_2020-11-05_at_11_05_46_pm.png_1718483346.png

PM Ralph Gonsalves and the ULP candidates. | Photo: Facebook / Ralph Gonsalves

Published 5 November 2020

The ULP retained its eight parliamentary seats and picked up one additional seat in Noth Leeward.


The Unity Labour Party (ULP) of Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves has been elected to govern St. Vincent & the Grenadines for a fifth term.

RELATED: PM Gonsalves Seeks Reelection in Saint Vincent & the Grenadines

The party won 9 of the 15 parliamentary seats, picking up the North Leeward seat which had been held by the New Democratic Party (NDP) while retaining its eight previous seats.

SVG’s opposition NDP went into the elections with Dr. Godwin Friday, who is leading the party for the first time after replacing Arnhim Eustace as the leader.



“Today, the people of St. Vincent & the Grenadines embraced the politics of “Lifting SVG Higher. They embraced our progressive agenda for the future by returning us to the government.”

“I am humbled and honoured that the people of St. Vincent & the Grenadines embraced our bold vision for the future and rejected the politics of hate, backwardsness and colonialism noted Ralph Gonsalves, leader of the ULP.”

“We ask Vincentians to celebrate this victory in peace and maturity. Now is the time to come together as one nation to address our developmental challenges and move forward to uplift our nation and it’s people,” Gonsalves stated.

Official election results are expected to be announced on Friday morning.



Ralph Gonsalves’ ULP Re-Elected in St. Vincent & the Grenadines
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Assessing the latest events in Latin America

Franco Vielma | 29 Oct 2020, 8:20 am.

chile_.jpg

Chileans support the Chilean "Approve" in Plaza Italia in the capital Santiago (Foto: Martin Bernetti / AFP)

Latin America is once again trembling, this time due to the conjunctural imbalance suffered by the agenda of the regional right in light of the events that are taking place in several countries of the region.

The recovery of democratic institutions through electoral channels in Bolivia, as well as the results of the plebiscite for the change of the Constitution in Chile, are the main milestones that we must definitively highlight.

But there is much more to be said and assumed about these events and so many others, as well as what triggered them.

A brief regional overview

Bolivia is right now the main reference for the new boost of leftist forces in the region. The overwhelming victory of Luis Arce, with 55% at the polls, annihilated the possibilities of a new electoral type variant within the context of the coup in the Andean country that took place in November 2019.

As is well known, the role of the deposed president Evo Morales was crucial to reunify the social forces affiliated with masismo and, consequently — against many forecasts — the Bolivian institutionality will return to regular paths.

After the Bolivian milestone, the international press revealed, and it was later confirmed by Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Evo Morales visited Venezuela, which opens the way to new possibilities for the recomposition of relations between La Paz and Caracas and, consequently, a new rearrangement in the structure of regional relations to the left.

La Paz opens its way to the reunion with the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America – Peoples' Trade Treaty (ALBA–TCP), and Luis Arce has said that he will also resume relations with Havana.

bolivia%20Stringer.%20Reuters.jpg

Bolivians voted massively for MAS (Photo: Reuters)

Chile: this South American nation has the indisputable milestone that, at the expense of a genuine social explosion in 2019, it has been the subject of a political impulse, specifically, to change the Constitution inherited by dictator Augusto Pinochet.

78% of Chilean voters approved the drafting of a new Constitution without the participation of representatives of Congress, since the drafting of the text will be left to a constituent convention that will be made up of 155 citizens who will be elected entirely by popular vote.

Chile is now becoming a benchmark, precisely because the events that led to this political balance were unleashed at the expense of a solid social cohesion around the outbreak of last year. Without a single and clear leadership and with a very diffuse initial political horizon, Chileans have given new impetus to the possibilities of turning to the left.

Chile was, just like Venezuela at one point, the "vitrine country" for the dominant neoliberal model, which indicates that the dispute in this country has only just begun.

In this context, new uncertainties are opening that will demand a much more consistent cohesion, a common roadmap and a strategy in all terms for the traditional left forces in that country, which we know are regularly in the electoral minority and dispersed by divisions.

Chile%20AFP_0.jpg

The Chilean celebration did not wait for the victory of the "Approve" (Photo: AFP)

Colombia: today this country is going through another episode of the successive crises and shocks that the Uribe government of Iván Duque is dealing with.

The National Strike of Colombia, an unprecedented protest movement that was born in 2019 and that has fostered a prolonged state of simmering social revolt, now has a new component: the Indigenous Minga, an experienced political force forged in indigenous and peasant protests in the New Granada nation.

Perhaps the importance of this movement today lies in the context itself. The Duque government, and consequently Uribism, grapple with a peculiar moment.

This is marked by the successive political crises and scandals that have been unleashed against the Nariño government. The violations of the Peace Accords, the dismemberment of the institutionality, the solid accusations of drug trafficking against high-ranking officials which emerge from the Colombian institutions themselves, and the political crimes that wear down the government's image, are pieces of this plot.

Additionally, the situation of deterioration of the Colombian government has been accentuated, especially since the criminal cases opened against Álvaro Uribe Vélez, who had to resign from the Senate to avoid justice. Now, in conditions of freedom, the entire country is targeting the Colombian Prosecutor's Office, deepening the spiral of political crisis.

The political synthesis that Colombia is aiming at seems to be that of a hitherto inexorable shift in politics in that country. The "Ñeñe Politica" scandal has already revealed that Uribe is not an electoral majority and that they are usurping power through drug fraud. Hence, the possibilities increase for new actors, including Gustavo Petro, the most solid leader of the Colombian opposition and a reference for the regional moderate left.

colombia%20minga.jpg

The indigenous Minga has been the protagonist of Colombia in recent weeks (Photo: Reuters)

Venezuela: the main critical knot on the US agenda in the Western Hemisphere remains in the headlines. Venezuela is propping up its upcoming parliamentary elections despite countless pressures. The policy of the State Department of the Trump Administration has managed to consummate a harsh economic and commercial blockade against the country, but Caracas has not fallen.

Against many predictions, President Nicolás Maduro is still standing and "Operation Guaidó", or the agenda of placing an overlapping parallel government as a mechanism to enable the failure of Venezuelan institutions, has failed.

The possibilities that loom over Venezuela lie in its strategic resistance to pressure and declaring its internal political roadmap unmovable and non-negotiable. An indisputable sign of institutional solidity where Chavismo does not lose its position in its center of political gravity.

Chavismo is emerging as the winner. By achieving an electoral majority in Parliament, it will put an end to the fateful parliamentary agenda that began in 2016 and which led the country to the depths of siege and external interference.

Although Venezuela will have to deal with the difficult process of recognition of its elections, and although the country has to deal with the spasms and extensions of foreign agendas that seek to disable Venezuelan institutions and the popular vote, the country will see new adjustments in its internal policy.

The practical electoral disappearance of some traditional opposition forces will be consummated and an entire political class will be displaced and transferred abroad, outside their natural spaces.

In this sense, Venezuela will be a clear example of endurance and drive in deeply adverse conditions, sustaining itself as the most relevant bastion of Latin American revolutions in the present.

maduro.png

President Nicolás Maduro during a press conference at the Miraflores Palace (Photo: Manaure Quintero/Reuters)

The trends driven by movements in the region

From this point on, it is essential to overcome the worn out phrases about a new regional "progressive cycle". It would be an exaggeration to resettle that claim. Let's first assume that, in effect, there are new clear events of a turnaround, which have had specific electoral episodes in Mexico and Argentina in recent years, and that the trend deepens in 2020 with the balances in Bolivia and Chile, with its peculiarities.

Also, it should be noted that instances, such as the Puebla Group, have relaunched new forms of elemental cohesion among various agents on the Latin American left, at the expense of the fervent social movements in various countries of the region in 2019. Let's remember: Ecuador, Chile and Colombia were milestones that have outlined a path in which some social forces have tried to join.

The particularities of the regional left also stem from its nuances. Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua continue to be the toughest triad, benchmarks of regional anti-imperialism and, therefore, the most severe targets of attack. Their positions as bastions of resistance have also been maintained.

Far from the moderations that characterize the governments of Argentina and Mexico, the main triad of the ALBA–TCP is the exact point of shock and trauma in the dispute over the continent. That is why its persistence is unfailingly added to the political balance of the region this year.

Another trend shown by the current movements in the region is the reconfiguration of UNASUR. Its relaunch has been proposed by President Maduro on several occasions in his role as Head of State, and today Evo Morales, now a symbolic leader of Bolivia and the region, plays an active role in this task. At the same time, Rafael Correa and Ernesto Samper have been outspoken promoters of its restoration.

The panoramic assessment thus consists of a containment and imbalance of the solid offensive of the US agenda in the region, which had made flaming, almost unstoppable progress in recent years.

Finally, the recovery of political spaces and the conquest of new ones, for the emerging forces, will have inflections with the results in US policy in the coming months. It is essential to look at the regional table together with the movement of pieces to the other side of the board.

Assessing the latest events in Latin America
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
“A Tremendous Jump for Progressive Forces”: Puerto Rico Election Signals End of Two-Party Dominance

STORY | NOVEMBER 11, 2020

We look at election results in Puerto Rico, where progressives have made historic inroads against the two traditional parties, the Popular Democratic Party and the New Progressive Party. “There is no question that the old monopoly of the two political parties that have dominated Puerto Rican politics for decades is coming to an end, and that’s a very good thing,” says historian Rafael Bernabe, who was just elected to the Puerto Rico Senate as part of the Citizens’ Victory Movement.

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González. This is The Quarantine Report, as we turn to Puerto Rico, where where election authorities have discovered around 126 briefcases with hundreds of uncounted ballots from last week’s election. It remains unclear what impact the ballots could have on the election results.

In the governor’s race, Pedro Pierluisi of Puerto Rico’s pro-statehood New Progressive Party has claimed victory after winning just a third of the vote in the tight race. Another New Progressive candidate, Miguel Romero, has claimed victory in the close San Juan’s mayor’s race. But in both races, election officials have been slow to certify the results.

We go now to San Juan to speak with the historian Rafael Bernabe, who was just elected to the Puerto Rican Senate as a member of the Citizens’ Victory Movement. He’s co-written several books, including Puerto Rico in the American Century: A History Since 1898 and Puerto Rico: Crisis and Alternatives.

Congratulations on your victory. Can you talk about the significance, Rafael Bernabe, of your win and also the other people in the Puerto Rican Legislature, which look like you’re really going to be turning it around?

SEN.-ELECT RAFAEL BERNABE: Yes. One of the main — first of all, good morning, and very happy to be here with you. One of the main differences, one of the main events, main aspects of these elections in Puerto Rico, is the fact that two progressive forces did very well in the election. As you mentioned, the governor, Pierluisi, won with a mere — he barely got 33% of the vote. The Puerto Rico Independence Party got around 15% of the vote. And the movement I belong to, which is the Movimiento Victoria Ciudadana, got also around 15% of the vote. That means that the progressive-left forces got around 30% of the vote, which is almost as much as the person who won the governorship got. So, we have a very significant increase in the electoral support for movements which are linked to the labor movement, to the women’s movement, to the environmental movement.

In our case, we elected at least four legislators: two representatives and two senators. And we are still in the fight, in the struggle. We think we may have another representative elected. The Puerto Rico Independence Party elected two legislators: one representative and one senator. So, this is a minority, but a significant force in the Puerto Rico Legislature, which is going to be fighting against the austerity policies that we have been suffering in Puerto Rico for the longest time, against the anti-labor policies and anti-environmental policies that the Puerto Rican governments have been imposing on us, again, for many decades now. So, it’s a very encouraging result for progressive forces in Puerto Rico, the results of these last elections.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Rafael Bernabe, one of the key things, as you mentioned, is that the voters seem to be turning away from the monopoly of the two-party systems, of the statehood party and the commonwealth party, not only in terms of voting for alternative candidates, but also for staying home. This was an all-time low in turnout among Puerto Rican voters. Barely 50% of the electorate voted, whereas in the past it’s been 80, 85%. What happened there in terms of all the people who decided just to stay home?

SEN.-ELECT RAFAEL BERNABE: Yeah, well, as you mention, there are two dimensions to this. On the one hand, as you mentioned, the vote for the two historically dominant parties in Puerto Rico keeps going down. The party that won the elections this time got barely 33% of the vote. The other historically dominant party, the Partido Popular, got around 31% of the vote. As I said, this is a new low for these parties. It’s the result of the very deep economic crisis that we have been undergoing, and people turning away from these parties that have not been able to provide any alternative to the situation in which Puerto Rico finds itself.

And at the same time there are many people who are completely dissatisfied with these two parties, they are not yet convinced of voting for a pro-independence party or for a progressive-left, left-wing force, such as Victoria Ciudadana. But they are already unwilling to vote for the parties that they historically voted for. We have many statehood — supporters of statehood who did not go to vote for the PNP. They would normally have gone to vote for the PNP; they didn’t go to vote. They didn’t vote for the Partido Popular, either. They didn’t vote for Victoria Ciudadana or the PIP, either. But they stayed home, because they were so disgusted with the policies of the parties that they have historically supported, that they preferred not to vote.

There’s another element which should be factored in this consideration, which is that over the past decade migration from Puerto Rico has been extraordinary. There are so many people that have been forced to leave the island because they cannot find work, they cannot find jobs in Puerto Rico. So the electoral rolls in Puerto Rico are right now very inflated. There are many people who are still listed as voters in Puerto Rico who no longer live in Puerto Rico, no longer vote in Puerto Rico. So that will also bring down the figure for the percentage of the people who turned out to vote.

But as I said, there’s no question that many people protested against the existing — the two parties that have historically dominated Puerto Rican politics by voting for the alternatives of the Partido Independentista and Victoria Ciudadana, and there were others who just stayed home. But regardless of the way they expressed their protest, there is no question that the old monopoly of the two political parties that have dominated Puerto Rican politics for decades is coming to an end. And that’s a very good thing.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And I wanted to ask you about the other aspect of the election. There was also a referendum on status, which only gave the voters a choice between the current status or statehood. You are known as an independentista. And I’m wondering what you would say to those in the United States, especially in the Democratic Party and some so-called progressives, who really want to support statehood for Puerto Rico, because they think it would help change the balance of power in the U.S. Senate and in Congress. What would you say to those folks who say it’s a good thing for Puerto Rico to become a state?

SEN.-ELECT RAFAEL BERNABE: Well, as I said, I’m a supporter of independence. The Movimiento Victoria Ciudadana is not, as such, a movement that supports independence. We include people who support different status options. I am a supporter of independence, as you said.

I think the plebiscite that was just held is an indication — let me say, the objective of this plebiscite, by the proponents and the people who approved it, the present administration of the New Progressive Party — the objective of the plebiscite was to obtain a very strong, very clear, very forceful mandate for statehood in Puerto Rico. And they failed to get that. They got 52% of the vote for statehood, and that means that 48% of the people who voted voted against statehood. So, it should be clear that there is not such a thing as a forceful, strong mandate or demand for statehood in Puerto Rico.

I think that the demand for progressives in the United States should be self-determination for Puerto Rico. What Puerto Rico should become should be a decision of the Puerto Rican people. Progressives in the United States should not be pushing, I think, for statehood. They should be pushing for the Puerto Rican people being able to decide what they want to become, and for them to be able to do that under conditions which are fair. For example, Puerto Rico is going through a very deep economic crisis, much of which is the result of decisions taken by the U.S. Congress. I think the U.S. federal government has to take responsibility for the situation in Puerto Rico. It has to make a significant, some people would call it, reparation for the situation that we find in Puerto Rico, for the economic reconstruction of Puerto Rico. And it has to enable, it has to open the space for, a process through which the Puerto Rican people can decide what they want to be. Progressives in the United States, I think, should be defending that right of the Puerto Rican people to decide what their future should be — not pushing for statehood, but, rather, pushing for the right of the Puerto Rican people to decide. Of course, some of us won’t support —

AMY GOODMAN: Rafael Bernabe, I wanted to turn to someone who also won, as you did, the Afro-Puerto Rican human rights feminist and LGBTQI activist Ana Irma Rivera Lassén, who was elected to the Puerto Rican Senate. She spoke to Democracy Now! last week about her historic win.

SEN.-ELECT ANA IRMA RIVERA LASSÉN: [translated] I’ve received messages of joy from many people, women, Afro-descendants, LGBTQI people, people from many communities in Puerto Rico, who are conscious of making a Puerto Rico that is more inclusive, a Puerto Rico that represents all of us, and in the building of a more inclusive country, push for sustainable economic development, search for a solution on our status as a U.S. colony, be a country that is not just divided on what our status should be, but a country that focuses on the inclusion to defend people’s human rights and the basic necessities for our people that the Puerto Rican government must respect and guarantee. We have to approach this through a lens of inclusion.

AMY GOODMAN: That’s Ana Irma Rivera Lassén, the first lesbian woman of African descent — the first openly lesbian woman of African descent to be elected to the Puerto Rican Legislature. She joins with you and María de Lourdes Santiago of the Independence Party in what people are calling, to what we know in the United States, is similar to The Squad. And if you can talk about what this means for the people of Puerto Rico, all of your elections?

SEN.-ELECT RAFAEL BERNABE: Yeah, absolutely. Ana Irma Rivera Lassén, she’s the president of the Movimiento Victoria Ciudadana, I should add. And she was a candidate for the Senate. She is a pioneer fighter for women’s rights, for gay and lesbian rights, for the struggle against racism in Puerto Rico. She’s a former president of the Puerto Rico Bar Association. So, she’s a very significant figure in the Puerto Rican public sphere as a defender of human rights, as a defender of democratic rights.

I think, as I said, that we have a new minority, but a very significant minority, in the Legislature, which is going to be fighting for women’s rights, for workers’ rights, for environmental protection, fighting the policies that are being imposed on us by the federally appointed federal control board. And so, as I said, the tremendous increase in the vote for the Puerto Rico Independence Party, which went from around 3% of the vote to 15% of the vote, the vote that we got, which is, again, at around 15% of the vote, that means that we represent a force which is about a third — a third of the electorate voted for the Puerto Rican Independence Party and the Movimiento Victoria Ciudadana. So, this is a tremendous jump for progressive forces in Puerto Rico in electoral terms. Given the —

AMY GOODMAN: Rafael Bernabe, I want to say thank you so much for being with us. Yes, we know you as a professor, a sociologist, historian and politician, leading voice of the left in Puerto Rico, now as a Puerto Rican state senator, running as a member of, in English, the Citizens’ Victory Movement. And we’ll continue to follow what you do in the Legislature.

Next up, we look at the Supreme Court’s oral arguments on the Affordable Care Act. It looks like the conservative court appears poised to uphold it.

“A Tremendous Jump for Progressive Forces”: Puerto Rico Election Signals End of Two-Party Dominance
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
The US is doing its best to lock out China from Latin America and the Caribbean

Vijay Prashad writes on how the US has meddled in trade relations between China and El Salvador, while promoting its own private investment initiatives

November 04, 2020 by Vijay Prashad

america-crece-el-salvador.jpg

Nayib Bukele signed "America Crece," an aid agreement with the US on January 30, 2020.

On August 20, 2018, El Salvador’s leftist president Salvador Sánchez Cerén announced on national television that El Salvador would break its ties with Taiwan and recognize the People’s Republic of China. This was in accord with international law, said Sánchez Cerén, and it would bring “great benefits for our country.”

Not long after, US Senator Marco Rubio took to Twitter to announce that this move “will cause real harm to relationship with US including their role in #AllianceforProsperity.” Earlier, both the Dominican Republic and Panama had made the shift, but Rubio said that El Salvador would be specially punished because it was ruled by the left-wing Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN). It did not seem to matter to Rubio that his own country, the United States, had shifted its ties to China from Taiwan in 1979.

The “Alliance for Prosperity,” which was Rubio’s hashtag, referred to US President Barack Obama’s deal with several Central American countries to provide some modest development aid in exchange for a beefed up police force and the prevention of transit of migrants toward the United States; this was border enforcement dressed up as development. Rubio’s threats were inconsequential; the money was too little, and the price paid by the populations of Central America was too steep.

In November 2018, Sánchez Cerén went to Beijing where he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Trade relations were front and center of the discussion, including encouragement for El Salvador to participate in China’s growing Belt and Road Initiative. A year later, in December 2019, Sánchez Cerén’s successor—Nayib Bukele—arrived in Beijing to reaffirm the ties between El Salvador and China, as well as the desire of his center-right government to develop Belt and Road projects. It did not seem to matter if the president of El Salvador was from the right or the left; both were eager to acknowledge the importance of China’s role in the region, and both were willing to “harm”—as Rubio put it—their relationship with the United States.

As news of the Chinese deals were announced, Bukele was criticized for getting El Salvador into a “debt trap.” He responded firmly on Twitter. “What part of ‘non-refundable’ do you not understand?” he asked, referring to the fact that China was giving El Salvador grants and not loans.

America Crece

But the game was not over. On January 30, 2020, Bukele stood beside Adam Boehler, the head of the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), to sign an agreement to implement “America Crece” in his country.

En route back to El Salvador from China in December, Bukele stopped in Tokyo, where Prime Minister Shinzo Abe warned him not to allow Chinese companies to invest in the La Unión port. China’s Asia Pacific Xuan Hoa Investment Company had been in talks to invest a considerable amount of money in the port. The US government had campaigned against this, and now Abe whispered the US’s warning into Bukele’s ear. The chill of the tensions between Washington and Beijing stopped Bukele’s hand; it was inevitable that he would seek to placate the United States as far as possible without breaking with China.

The instrument used is America Crece, or “Growth in the Americas,” a US project that was launched in 2018. The US says that China is not transparent with its deals, but there is almost nothing available on America Crece (and the US State Department and the DFC did not immediately respond to requests for comment). An FAQ on the US State Department website says that the program “seeks to catalyze private sector investment in infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean.” The US government will operate to open doors for US (and at least in one case, Israeli) companies.

In October 2018, the US Congress passed the Better Utilization of Investment Leading to Development (BUILD) Act, which joined the Overseas Private Investment Corporation and the Development Credit Authority into the DFC. US President Donald Trump placed Boehler—Jared Kushner’s former roommate—as its head. The budget for the agency is $60 billion. In September 2020, a bipartisan consensus drew up the America Labor, Economic Competitiveness, Alliances, Democracy, and Security (America LEADS) Act to undermine Chinese investments. Both Democrats and Republicans are committed to this anti-China agenda.

One of the main DFC projects in El Salvador is the construction of a natural gas plant in Acajutla, which is owned by the US energy firm Invenergy and its Salvadorian subsidiary Energía del Pacífico. US Ambassador Ronald Johnson said that the DFC will provide financing for the project (it will be about $1 billion). Eyebrows have been raised in El Salvador about the lack of concern for the environmental impact of the plant as well as the subsea pipeline on marine life and on the coastal habitat.

Ugliness of America Crece

America Crece funds have been promised across the border in Honduras to build the Jilamito hydroelectric plant. On August 13, 2020, US Representative Ilhan Omar and 27 other representatives wrote a letter to Boehler, in which they pointed out that the project “has met a sustained campaign of opposition from affected local communities since it was announced.” An attorney for the communities—Carlos Hernández—was assassinated in April 2018, following the attacks that killed activist Ramón Fiallos in January 2018.

In late July 2020, armed men entered the home of Sneider Centeno in Triunfo de la Cruz and abducted him. They did the same to three other leaders of the Garífuna community. The US representatives wrote that the DFC is cutting deals with Honduras’ President Juan Orlando Hernández who “has a record that includes gross human rights violations, credible accusations of electoral fraud, deep connections to narcotrafficking and organized crime, and corruption.” There is ugliness in America Crece.

$1 Trillion Versus $60 Billion

The US has committed $60 billion to the DFC. Meanwhile, China plans to spend at least $1 trillion on the Belt and Road Initiative. Part of the Chinese money comes, as Bukele wrote when he left Beijing, as grants.

All of this irks Washington. David Malpass, US undersecretary for international affairs, said in February 2018 that the US faced a serious challenge from “China’s non-market activities.” China invests and provides grants, Malpass said, with no insistence that the recipient countries “improve” their “macroeconomic policies”; in other words, China does not make it a habit to place conditions on the loans such as to undermine labor laws or to cut subsidies for health and education (as the International Monetary Fund and the US Treasury Department often do); nor does China privilege the private sector. These are the “non-market activities.”

In a recent article, Professor Sun Hongbo of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences wrote that the US government “pressure[d] Latin American countries to cooperate with the US global policy agenda,” so that these countries—such as El Salvador—would have to choose between Beijing and Washington. No such pressure comes from China, wrote Sun.

This is a view echoed in Latin American and Caribbean capitals; they face pressure from Washington to break ties with China, something loathsome to most of the countries, as it has been for El Salvador’s Bukele.

The US is doing its best to lock out China from Latin America and the Caribbean
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,206
Reputation
14,339
Daps
200,480
Reppin
Above the fray.
ASÈ




Miguel Algarín, Force Behind Nuyorican Cafe, Dies at 79
His Lower East Side performance space has been an incubator for poets, playwrights and other artists, many of them not initially embraced by the mainstream.

merlin_180765453_806e1393-1e51-49a5-a411-028c4bf9c358-articleLarge.jpg

Miguel Algarín, left, a founder of the Nuyorican Poets Cafe, with his fellow poet Lucky CienFuegos at the cafe, on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, in 1976.Credit...Paul Hosefros/The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/by/neil-genzlinger

  • Published Dec. 3, 2020
Miguel Algarín, a poet and driving force behind the Nuyorican Poets Cafe, a performance space on the Lower East Side of Manhattan that since 1973 has played host to poetry readings, plays and more by Puerto Rican and other artists who have had trouble being heard in the mainstream, died on Monday in Manhattan. He was 79.

His nephew John Howard-Algarín, a municipal judge in New York City, said the apparent cause of death, in a hospital, was sepsis.

Mr. Algarín, who was born in Puerto Rico but lived most of his life in New York, had a keen sense of the dual identity felt by many people with a similar story. He had an equally keen ear for the language of the street and the power of poetry performed live. He was a foundational figure in the Nuyorican literary movement, which encompassed writers and other New York artists who were born in Puerto Rico or were of Puerto Rican descent and whose works often explored their identity and their marginalization.




 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
The National Campaign Command of the Afro-Venezuelan Social Movement has been sworn in

Caracas, October 8, 2020

This Thursday, the swearing-in ceremony of the Darío Vivas National Campaign Command for the Venezuelan Afro-descendant sector took place, an organized force that is going for the first time as a social sector to the National Assembly (Asamblea Nacional, AN), as stated by the coordinator of the Darío Vivas National Campaign Command of the Great Patriotic Pole (GPP) for the Social Movements, Blanca Eekhout.

“It is our Bolivarian Revolution, our Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which allowed us to assemble the excluded peoples, the peoples that had been condemned by colonialism and capitalist barbarism precisely not to participate in the laws of the legal framework of the Republic”, she said.

She also stressed that it the indigenous, peasant, working class, women and Afro-descendant people come to the National Parliament as part of the Revolution. “In this battle we are facing the imperialist racism of Donald Trump, of the United States that attack Venezuela because it has raised the flag of the Afro-descendants, indigenous peoples, mestizos, equality and justice since the process of our independence, among other reasons”, she said.

She emphasized that today this historical struggle for freedom is consolidated in this consciousness movement of the Afro-descendant people and it is part of the fight to achieve victory on December 6, 2020 when the parliamentary election will be held.

The National Campaign Command of the Afro-Venezuelan Social Movement has been sworn in
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Afro-descendants 20 years later

By: Jorge Guerrero Veloz | Saturday, December 5, 2020 | 07:26

"We entered as blacks and left as Afro-descendants"

Romero Rodríguez (2000)

There has been 20 years since the social construct of politically recognizing cultural identity known as Afro-descendant was conceptualized, a determination that was reached on December 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2000 in Santiago de Chile, where the Regional Pre-conference on Citizenship and Human Rights of the Americas was held, organized by the United Nations, the OAS and the different multilateral organizations of the region at the Diego Portales Convention Center.

A social construct that was not created in any laboratory, let alone from some brainiac intellectual or other group of hegemonic power. It was born from the depths of the Afro-Brazilian social movements, heroic heirs of the anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist struggles of Zumbi dos Palmares, a concept that gave us our own political identity, as political subjects of fact and rights, breaking away from the colonial invention and usurping of identity, calling people who were considered property “Negroes”.

This social and political construct collects and recognizes the different historical currents of our struggles. It did not exclude and does not exclude historical proposals such as Garveysism or Rastafarianism, Afro-Americanism, Black Power, Negritude, among others. On the contrary, it is the historical accumulation of all those historical currents of African descent, which in their context claimed and claim all our social, political, moral, cultural and spiritual struggles.

In this sense, we had the conscience and the political stature to debate, discuss and contribute, from our perspectives, the importance of finding a term, or concept, that would unify us; there was a great debate among the Afro-descendant social movements of the region, since the Afro-American concept, despite the fact that we were all on the same continent, at that moment, was understood exclusively to recognize African-Americans.

Thus, the Afro-descendants concept was placed on the table for debate, which we all unanimously approved, since the term was broader and more unifying, whilst recognizing us anywhere in this American and Caribbean continent.

That way, we built the social political proposal on the respect, vindication and recognition of our human rights which we raised before this important pre-conference on citizenship and human rights organized by the United Nations, the OAS and the multilateral organizations of the region, in which different social movements participated, in their diversity, from the American and Caribbean region. The Agenda of the Pre-Conference of Santiago on Citizenship and Human Rights was focused on issues such as the struggles against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, intolerance and its related forms. It was aimed at preparing documents for the governments and civil society organizations of the region on human rights in order to present them at the Third World Conference, which was held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001.

It was there where, for the first time, officially within the framework of human rights and multilateralism, the recognition of the social and political construct of the Afro-descendant concept began in the Americas and the Caribbean, ratified at the Third World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, and Related Intolerance.

Representing the Afro-Venezuelan social movement, the delegation was headed by Jesús Chucho García, Reina Arratia, Luis Perdomo and myself. I remember when the document of the plan of action was approved, considered a political triumph for Afro-Americans.

It is worth highlighting the role played by the Afro-Latin American and Caribbean Strategic Alliance, an organization that brought together Afro-descendant progressive social movements in the region.

Twenty years later, out of those political and social conquests within the framework of multilateralism, we have to assess the advances and setbacks on the public policies that the states and their governments, who committed themselves and signed this plan of action, should implement for the Afro-descendants in the different regions. Policies committed to the elimination and combat of racism, racial discrimination, recognition in the national constitutions of the states, recognition as social and political actors, rights over the territories where Afro-descendant communities historically live and have inhabited, recognition of history, the right to an education that recognizes the social, political and moral contributions in the construction of nation states, respect for cultural and spiritual manifestations of African origin, among others.

By way of reflection, twenty years later, the states and their various governments, despite ratifying these commitments at the Third World Conference in Durban South Africa in 2001 and later in 2015 with the signing of the 2015–2024 International Decade for Afro-descendants decreed by the United Nations, statistics tell us that little or nothing has been done for Afro-descendants in terms of public policies. On the contrary, racism and racial discrimination have increased.

In recent years, murders of Afro-descendants have been on the rise. Exclusion, marginalization and judicialization do not stop; racial-police brutality towards Afro-descendants is in vogue. Systematic violations of human rights for Afro-descendants are increasingly frequent, while the high commissioner who legislates on them taking a stand or giving guarantees. Racial demagoguery in political-partisan terms is an instrument used opportunistically to gain media coverage.

In short, twenty years later, we are still waiting political responses to those commitments assumed by states and governments.

Out of respect, recognition and justice, as established by the International Decade for Afro-descendants decreed by the United Nations, we refuse to think that — as said in an old tango song — “20 years are nothing”. That is, a brief historical overview of events that shook, from social and political perspectives, the consciousness of Afro-descendants in the Americas and the Caribbean; facts that also resulted in the positioning of this concept in the public agenda of countries with an African cultural presence and the recognition of a new social actor, with the rank of political subject and with political rights to be conquered.

Afro-descendants 20 years later
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Guyana and Suriname can underpin CARICOM’s sovereignty and prosperity

December 06, 2020

The presidents of Guyana and Suriname have announced two major joint venture projects whose implementation will deepen the beneficial relations between the two countries, and could have a positive effect for the 15-nation Caribbean Community (CARICOM) of which they are members.

The projects are a bridge across the Courantyne river to link the two countries, and the construction of a US$1 billion offshore base to support huge oil discoveries in the Guyana-Suriname basin of more than 10 billion barrels of oil.

Relations between the two countries have not always been harmonious. Land and sea territorial disputes have caused military skirmishes and tension in the past. Fortunately, successive governments of both territories were sufficiently restrained to stop short of a full-scale war – a marked difference with the other countries on the South American continent.

Peaceful resolution of disputes through negotiation and international arbitration, and active fostering of economic integration, have always been the best way forward for Guyana (formerly British Guiana) and Suriname (formerly Dutch Guiana). Along with French Guiana, they make up what used to be known as ‘The Three Guianas’, lying next to each other on the north-eastern coast of South America.

In the foreword to the book, “Post-Colonial Trajectories in the Caribbean: The Three Guianas”, published by Routledge in 2017, I wrote: “Guyana and Suriname are more similar to each other than they are to any of the member countries of CARICOM, except Trinidad and Tobago. Given the similarity of their resources which includes mining, agriculture, fisheries and oil, they would benefit enormously from the economic integration of their production, freedom of movement of goods and services, joint bargaining with foreign investors and the international community generally”.

I added: “If the governments of Guyana and Suriname – together with the private sectors of both countries – were to work diligently toward economic integration, the two countries could easily become a joint economic powerhouse, exporting their products globally”. In this connection, it is noteworthy that the Surinamese President, Chandrikapersad Santokhi, said that the US$1 billion offshore base “will extend also to the private sector so that we can have a public-private partnership approach”.

In pursuing joint venture projects that will strengthen their economic integration, the governments have sensibly not ignored their one remaining territorial dispute. Having settled their maritime boundary dispute in September 2007 under an arbitration by the United Nations Tribunal on the Law of the Sea, the governments have agreed that their joint Border Commission will continue to examine ways of resolving the land border dispute over an area known as ‘the New River Triangle’.

Guyana’s President Irfaan Ali, in noting that the “future of (the two) economies is intertwined”, also stated that “Guyana and Suriname are also part of the Caribbean Community”. He did not have to do so. His deliberate inclusion of this remark to the Suriname Parliament, is an indication of the importance his government places on CARICOM. Even more indicative of Guyana’s commitment to CARICOM is President Ali’s further remark that “both states (should) take the lead in demonstrating the efficacy of regional integration”. “Together”, he said, “we can meet and fulfil a great portion of the food needs within the Caribbean community”.

President Ali is right, provided that the long-standing problem of sea and air transportation can be resolved to carry food between Suriname-Guyana and other countries in CARICOM. The regional group’s bill for the importation of food is now US$5 billion a year. It would be highly beneficial to the region’s food security and its retention of foreign exchange, if its member states could collectively devise at least a break-even financial operation for a shipping line. It is a project which Guyana and Suriname, in collaboration with Trinidad and Tobago, might consider underwriting through a portion of their oil and gas income.

Guyana and Suriname are expected to receive significant revenues in the coming years. Neither country has the absorptive capacity to utilize all the expected annual income, however free spending they might be in building physical infrastructure, increasing the wages of their workforce, and improving health and education. They should be able to dedicate a portion of their revenues to invest in CARICOM projects and member states in ways that would strengthen the region, breaking its dependence on external powers and enhancing its integration.

None of this would be a give-away; it could be targeted investment in projects that provide financial returns for all the parties concerned, while accelerating development in CARICOM. In addition to food and related transportation, Suriname, Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago could consider, in consultation with other CARICOM states, how they could profitably underpin energy security for the region. That profit would be measured not only in financial terms, but also in the benefits of ending reliance on external countries and strengthening the sovereignty of the region in its decision-making.

Security of regional transportation, food and energy would be three important, immediate areas for Guyana and Suriname to “take the lead in demonstrating the efficacy of regional integration” to which President Ali referred.

The “dedicated pathway to deepen economic and social cooperation” between Guyana and Suriname should be applauded by all. Even as they pursue this path, from which both countries and their peoples will undoubtedly benefit, they should take the steps to examine how such cooperation can be extended to CARICOM.

The neighbourhood in which the people of Guyana and Suriname live would be more secure, and in that regard, so would they.

Guyana and Suriname can underpin CARICOM’s sovereignty and prosperity
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Despite COVID-19, the Caribbean Reparations Train Remained on Track in 2020!

December 06, 2020

2020, Year of COVID-19, was not only about the pandemic. The virus took lives and ruined life for too-many-to-count worldwide. But it also registered events worth chronicling in, around and for the Caribbean, especially relating to CARICOM governments’ quest for Reparations from Europe for Slavery and Native Genocide, launched in 2013.

Picking-up steam...

United Kingdom (UK) and European Union (EU) governments have continued to ignore a collective 2016 request by governments of 14 Caribbean nations, as former British and European colonies, for a discussion on a settlement for the long-outstanding demand.

While reviewing and recalibrating approaches in light of the deadly effects of COVID-19, the CARICOM Reparations Commission (CRC), primarily through its Chairman Professor Sir Hilary Beckles, engaged in 2018 with US Black Congressional leaders and national reparations entities, sharing common and different experiences and approaches.

Throughout 2019, the Black Lives Matter movement and later protests against police killings of Blacks across America turned the reparations issue into a hot political potato that saw US Democratic Presidential Hopefuls trip over each other to say what they’d do to fast-track reparations if voted into the Oval Office.

Then came the killing of George Floyd in May, which changed everything…

The 2020 Presidential election result has produced a promise by President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamla Harris to be the first US Administration to start Reparations payments across America.

US States are discussing how and when to board the Democrats’ reparations train next year, while Republican opponents seek to derail it before Biden enters the White House on January 20.

But the train’s left the main station — and from all evidence since George Floyd, there’s no stopping it now.

The final destination hasn’t been determined, but it’s definitely moving along on America’s tracks.

The Lewis Factor

The CARICOM train also gathered speed in 2020, with the CRC and the Saint Lucia National Reparations Committee (NRC) co-hosting the first Sir Arthur Lewis International Symposium (SALIS 2020) on June 16, which coincided with the 29th anniversary of the legendary Caribbean economist’s death.

The virtual symposium, addressed by Sir Hilary and Caribbean presenters from universities across the world, also unveiled Sir Arthur’s historical primal role as the ‘Intellectual Author of the Blueprint for Caribbean Reparations’, outlined in his first major book Labour in the West Indies (1939).

On August 1, during observance of Emancipation Day across the Caribbean, Professor Beckles announced the Reparations settlement being sought from Europe would be valued at US $500 Billion, in the form of a regional economic package to finance the modern equivalent of that advocated by Lewis in 1939, following the 1938 revolutions that forever shook the foundations of British colonialism across the then British West Indies.

Also on August 1, Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, as Chair of the CARICOM Prime Ministerial Subcommittee (PMSC) on Reparations, announced the region’s 14 Heads of Government had agreed to adopt Sir Arthur’s 80-year-old formula as the template for the settlement package being sought from the UK and Europe.

New Caribbean History

September 15 saw the launch of the Virtual Regional Schools’ History Lecture Series, initiated by the Saint Lucia NRC and the island’s UWI Open Campus unit, coordinated by the Jamaica-based Center for Reparations Research (CRR) and supported by the CRC.

The two-hour lectures, held during school hours once a month, allow historians, researchers, sociologists and writers worldwide to previously present untold, unheard and unseen versions Caribbean History — backed by facts and figures, maps and charts, Power-point and other audiovisual means — to students in classrooms and at home under COVID lockdown (as in Saint Lucia).

Schools in some CARICOM territories are attending with official permission or direction, while principals and teachers in other states tune-in and participate voluntarily, while education officials tighten arrangements for formal participation when the virtual schools’ Caribbean history lectures resume in January 2021.

Meanwhile, the UWI Open Campus, which reaches dozens of sites in over 30 offshore non-campus territories in the region and beyond, broadcasts the lectures through its Facebook and YouTube online platforms.

And ditto UWItv Global, expected to package similar related programs for broadcast during 2021…

First People, Last Citizens?

October saw joint and separate Caribbean observances of a Day of Recognition of Aboriginal Peoples (October 12), during which the region’s original inhabitants recommitted to the goals of rescuing their stolen identities, re-igniting the integration that existed between their civilizations before the Europeans arrived.

The CRR also observed its third anniversary on October 12.

On October 22, ahead of International Creole Day on October 25, Dame Pearlette Louisy, Saint Lucia’s longest-serving Governor General and Chair of the island’s Nobel Laureates Festival Committee (honouring its two Nobel Prizewinners Arthur Lewis and Derek Walcott), delivered the first-ever Online Kweyol Reparations Lecture on the topic ‘Reparations Delayed is Justice Denied’.

Delivered in the creole language indigenous to millions of Caribbean people in Dominica, Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Haiti, Martinique, Saint Lucia, Grenada and Trinidad & Tobago and throughout the global Kweyol Diaspora, including Africa, The Americas and Europe, Dame Pearlette’s lecture drew encouraging remarks from Kweyol-speakers in Haiti and worldwide, as well as English-speakers assisted by Power-point notes and visuals, who tuned-in to the widely advertised event.

In October and November, the untold histories of the region’s indigenous people were presented to regional schools, as students again came face to face – many for the first time — with leaders of different Caribbean indigenous communities.

The October 29 schools lecture on ‘The Myths of Extinction – Indigenous Peoples and their Survival Strategies’ featured presentations by acclaimed Caribbean Historian Dr Lennox Honeychurch, Dominica’s Minister for Kalinago Affairs and Rural Upliftment Cozier Frederick and President of the Garifuna Nation of Belize, Egbert Higinio.

Then on November 19, former Secretary General of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS) and current Chair of the UWI Open Campus Council, Ambassador Dr June Soomer, delivered a regional lecture on ‘First People, Last Citizens: From Native Genocide to National Isolation – What Next?’ in an event also featured online presentations by the Kalinago and Garifuna leaders and another on the indigenous people of St. Kitts and Nevis by the twin-island Federation’s NRC Chair, Carla Astaphan.

The three lectures on the region’s First People followed a June 11 Virtual Caribbean Reparations Youth Conference hosted by the Saint Lucia NRC, coordinated by the CRC and moderated by Saint Lucia’s Ambassador to CARICOM and the OECS Dr Elma Gene Isaac, which also featured online contributions by the Kalinago (formerly Carib) Chief in Dominica and the Santa Rosa First People community Chief from Trinidad & Tobago.

The First Peoples regional and schools’ lectures were followed in Caribbean indigenous communities, as well as by students and teachers, university lecturers, sociologists, historians and academics at high schools and universities across the region — and beyond.

The lectures also identified common themes of interest to the different First Peoples worth following-up, such as DNA-based identification and documentation of indigenous peoples’ regional traces, renaming of misnamed people and places and correction of falsified history.

They also pledged to rescue and preserve aboriginal and slave burial sites being unearthed in construction projects on former slave plantations and previously isolated or preserved areas across the region being opened-up to favor construction projects funded by uncaring foreign investors. “End of part one, read part two in next Saturday’s publication.”

Despite COVID-19, the Caribbean Reparations Train Remained on Track in 2020!
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Patricia Gomes: the lives and struggles of black people in ‘white’ Argentina

July 26, 2020

Patricia Victoria Gomes is an Afro-Argentine feminist and anti-racism activist. An attorney graduated from the University of Buenos Aires (UBA), she is a member of the board of directors of the Cape Verdean Mutual Aid Society as well as the gender field of the “November 8” Commission, the date which celebrates the National Day of Afro-Argentines and Afro-descendant Culture. Inserted in the official Argentine calendar in 2013, the date bears the symbol of María Remedios del Valle, an African-Argentine woman considered the “Mother of the Fatherland” and heroine of the independence war.

As part of the Black Latin American and Caribbean Women Day celebrations, the Perseu Abramo Foundation's Reconnecting Peripheries project publishes an interview with Patricia, made by writer Juliana Borges, in which the Afro-Argentine activist tells a little about what it is like to live and struggle in a society that successive governments and official educational policies intend to classify as completely white.

Check out the interview below:

First, we would like to talk a little about the situation of Afro-descendants in Argentina, because when we talk about Argentina, in Brazil, people hardly think that there are Afro-descendants. How was this historical invisibility constructed?

Patricia Gomes: The process of invisibilizing black communities in Argentina took place since the foundation of this country as a republic. We were victims of a historical and systematic process of denial and invisibility which made our communities plunge into marginalization and poverty, seeing our rights be systematically denied.

The ruling classes at the end of the 19th century conceived a type of country associated with development and progress, goals that could only be achieved by populating the vast Argentine territories with white, European immigrants. Thus, in 1853, the National Constitution was adopted, containing an article which states that “the Federal Government will promote European immigration” (Art. 25 of the Argentine National Constitution); a racist article that is still in effect and has not been modified by the different constitutional reforms.

We can see how, from the same fundamental norm, Argentina meticulously constructed the illusion of being a phenotypically white and culturally European country; a myth that persists to this day and translates into the constant foreignization suffered by the Afro-Argentine population, because we cannot be black and Argentine.

In 1996, ex-president Carlos Menen, during a diplomatic tour in the United States, maintained that “in Argentina there are no black people, that is Brazil's problem”. In 2018, former president Mauricio Macri said at the World Forum in Davos that we are only descended from Europeans. These expressions, carried out by the main representatives, are nothing more than the reflection of the ideological, historiographical and cultural construction of a country that has solidly installed the idea of a white Argentina in its popular imaginary.

patricia_gomes2-300x235.jpg

Personal archive

Statistical invisibility was one of the main tools manipulated by the State to erase black communities from official records and history, to support its civilizing and whitening project — a strategy accompanied by arguments constructed, sustained and replaced over time so that black people “died in wars and epidemics”.

The school, an institution that articulates hegemonic discourses, has always presented Afro-descendants as only being part of our colonial past, showing images that are stereotypical and limited to celebrations. It is not strange to see today the representations at school events in which they paint the children with burnt cork to represent “la negrita”, seller of empanadas or “el negrito”, as a candle seller in the square, on May 25, the day of the Revolution of the Fatherland.

We are shown in subordinate roles, and the true story is hidden, and it is full of great deeds, done by people of African descent, like María Remedios del Valle, a black and Argentine woman, who fought as a soldier in the wars for independence, was appointed captain of the army and called “Mother of the Fatherland”. Yes, the mother of the Argentine fatherland was black, Argentine and poor, everything Argentines don't want to be.

How do racial tensions occur in the country today? We know that there is an issue where the racial debate also includes the issue of immigrants. How does this integration happen and how have governments responded to it?

PG: From the 1990s onwards, Argentina began receiving a large number of African immigrants from Mali, Ghana, Sierra Leone and Senegal, among others. With the last decade, this immigration has intensified, mainly from Senegal. Thousand of Afro-Latin American immigrants also started to come to Argentina. These immigrants, brought primarily by economic and political issues, brought with them a revitalization of the black movement in Argentina, mainly in the big cities where they settled, but they also covered the veil of a phenomenon that was always denied: Criollo racism (as I like to call it).

Today, no one can deny the existence of black people in Argentina, because whoever takes to the streets can see our African comrades who subsist on the street trade. These same comrades are the ones who constantly suffer institutional and racist violence by the security forces.

But what happens is when an Afro-descendant is killed in the United States, thousands of miles away from us, expressions of solidarity and outrage immediately appear on social media, but when an Afro-descendant is beaten by police on any avenue in Buenos Aires, no one does anything. Doesn't anyone see this?

This “cardboard solidarity”, this hypocrisy is one that cuts across Argentine society. The media talk about the mafias that exploit the Senegalese, but the police and the justice system do not hesitate when they take from our brothers the only thing they have to survive, while engaging in unusual physical violence. As always, the last link in the chain is attacked.

Society believes and buys these xenophobic narratives encouraged by references from local politics and mass media, without the slightest analysis, and this context has a devastating effect on the lives of our communities that are constantly criminalized and also blamed for the economic hardships our country face.

Given these facts, we cannot go on to say that racism in Argentina does not exist. The presence of African immigrants once again undermines race relations in this country, which sees black people as a danger, a perfect excuse to implant the state's repressive apparatus against us. The consequences of this racism extend to all Afro-descendants and Afro-Argentines, who are seen as aliens and continue to form, like our African-American brothers, the group seen as a risk to the white and European ideal on which Argentine society rests.

What are the main demands of the Afro-Argentine movement today? Are there data collected on the Afro-Argentine population, so that effective public policies can be built to reduce inequalities generated by racism?

PG: One of the main demands of the Afro-descendant movement in Argentina is the inclusion of the ethnic-racial variable in the National Population Census, which would be this year, but which, due to the pandemic, will certainly be postponed.

In 2005, the first pilot test was carried out to measure the Afro-descendant population in Argentina, carried out by the National University of Tres de Febrero (UNTREF), with technical advice from the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC), financed by the World Bank, and two leaders of Afro-descendant organizations: Miriam Gomes, of the Cape Verdean Society of Dock Sud, and Lucía Molina, of the Amerindian-African American Culture House in Santa Fé. In this pilot test it was proposed to attract the Afro-descendant population of the country through questions based on self-perception or recognition of registered persons.

In this survey, between 4% and 5% of respondents recognized themselves as Afro-descendants; a percentage projected for the total population at the time (40 million inhabitants) allowed us to infer that about 2 million people recognize themselves as Afro-descendants in our country. These numbers began to fracture the invisibility of our community built over centuries.

The National Census of 2010 brought this important work together and incorporated the question of people's African descent into one of their questions. Unfortunately, this question was part of a form applied only to 10% of the population, providing only a sample of what was reported before: 149,493 people from 62,642 households recognized themselves as Afro-descendants, which represents 0.4% of the total population. Somewhat disappointing numbers, considering the data from the Pilot Test. Afro-descendant organizations claim that we are far more than 2 million people of African descent in Argentina.

Something that is very important to mention in relation to the data released by the National Census is that 92% of the people who recognized themselves as Afro-descendants are Argentine, a fact that challenges the myth that there are no Argentine black people.

With the assassination of George Floyd and the reaction of the Afro-descendant population in the United States, we have seen protests spread across the world. Some call it a “global uprising”. How did these revolts get to Argentina? We know that each country with a colonial past has its specifics about how racism is carried out and that it affects the way resistance is built. So, how does this moment of revolts dialogue with the Afro-Argentine movement?

PG: The assassination of George Floyd in the United States exposed, once again, the violence and institutional racism that black communities suffer in that country. In Argentina, thousands of people showed their indignation and solidarity on social media, while the media repeatedly repeated the terrible images of our brother Floyd being murdered by the police and white supremacy.

As I argued earlier, the hypocrisy of Argentine society means that when that same act of explicit racism is suffered by a Senegalese comrade in the middle of the street in Buenos Aires, they do not react in the same way, or better yet, they do not react at all. I would like to know if the situation of people of African descent in Argentina is better than in the United States.

The problem is that, in Argentina, Afro-descendant communities were excluded from national projects that sought to consolidate a phenotypically white and culturally European society, associating whiteness with ideas of progress. Black and indigenous populations have been erased from history, statistics and anything related to “Argentinity”, installing the myth that “there are no black men or women in Argentina”.

The global uprisings and #BlackLivesMatter provided an interesting opportunity for Afro-descendant organizations to set up, even for a moment, the discussion of racism in Argentina, to talk about the particular forms it takes in the country, linked to the history of denial of our identity. As a post-colonial and capitalist society, racism exists and has taken on such subtle forms that it is highly naturalized.

It becomes very difficult to have this discussion because we do not have access to the mass media, we do not have representation at various state levels to be able to promote any public policy aimed at reversing these situations. I really believe that we are light years away from finding a way out of racial problems in Argentina. Not for lack of organization, but for lack of political will to take racism seriously.

The National Day of Afro-Argentines is celebrated in on November 8. Tell us a little about these celebrations and why they take place on that date.

PG: Another achievement of the Afro-descendant movement in Argentina was the enactment of National Law 26,852, of April 24, 2013, which establishes November 8 as the National Day for Afro-Argentines and African Culture, in celebration of María Remedios del Valle, the Afro-Argentine woman considered the “Mother of the Fatherland”.

maria_remedios_del_valle_crop1573241073782.jpg_501420591-300x169.jpg

María Remedios del Valle. Reproduction

This law means the recognition of that black and Argentine woman, silenced by official history, the same history that says that we disappeared almost as if by magic. This recognition could have been a starting point for the creation of public policies, since it urges the Ministry of Education of the Nation to incorporate in the curriculum content of the educational system, at all levels, the celebration of that day and the promotion of public policies for Afro-descendant culture. Likewise, it entrusts to the National Ministry of Culture the commemoration of this day through public policies that make visible and support Afro-descendant culture in its different disciplines.

Truth be told, very little has been accomplished since the law was enacted. Sometimes I get the feeling that it means nothing more than merely symbolic recognition, so we settle in and have a day when we can play our drums (and stop bothering them). Meanwhile, the living conditions of black communities remain precarious and, in Argentina, there is no single public policy aimed at our community.

Undoubtedly, some self-criticism is necessary within our movements, where we will have to consider new strategies to put our historical demands on the public agenda, especially the fight against structural racism.
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
How is the relationship between the Afro-Argentine movement and the parliamentary agenda? How is the participation and political representation of Afro-Argentines like?

PG: There really is very little to say at this point. As I said throughout the interview, our communities lack representation at various state levels to be able to politically influence the official agenda of the Argentine government. We don't have black parliamentarians, so we also don't have an impact on the parliamentary agenda. As an organization, we present several bills in the National Congress and in local legislatures. One of the projects that await discussion in Congress, since 2018, is the one that proposes the creation of the National Institute of Afro-Argentine, Afro-descendant and African Affairs (INAFRO), whose objective will be the promotion, creation and application of public policies and targeted affirmative actions to the populations mentioned. At the same time, it aims to shed light and contribute to the historical value of the contribution of people of African descent to national identity and to promote the human rights of this group.

We are in the International Decade for People of African Descent, proclaimed by the United Nations (Resolution 68/237 of December 23, 2013) which covers the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024. The Argentine State joined the decade through a decree in 2017, but up until now no concrete measures or programs have been adopted to combat racism. We are still waiting.

maria_fernanda_silva-300x169.jpg

Maria Fernanda Silva. Reproduction

I cannot forget to mention that, this year, president Alberto Fernández appointed an Afro-Argentine woman (Maria Fernanda Silva) to a diplomatic career as Argentine ambassador to the Vatican, the first woman to lead this embassy, and she is black. An Afro-descendant man, Carlos Álvarez Nazareno, was also named National Director of Pluralism and Interculturality. I believe that these are small gestures that should be highlighted, but a real commitment is still needed to eradicate the racism that affects and marginalizes our communities.

The pandemic and the compulsory social isolation established in Argentina exposed the terrible inequalities that Afro-descendant communities suffer, especially women and diverse ethnic groups, the precarious and informal jobs that the majority of our population occupies; but it also demonstrated the networks of solidarity that we are able to create in the face of the suffering and needs of our community. Where the State does not respond, there are organizations.

Even with the specific characteristics, how do you think we can strengthen and build a Latin American and even inter-American anti-racist agenda?

PG: I believe it is essential to articulate our struggles, in all corners of the American continent, in the three Americas. I have always admired political movements like the Black Panthers or Malcolm X, by whom I was influenced in the way I conceive my activism. It is true that each country has its own particular characteristics and its own historical processes that make racism manifest in different ways. However, learning from other struggles is enriching because it allows us to think and rethink our own strategies according to our material conditions of existence.

I know that, in Brazil, the struggle of black movements has always been very powerful and visible, unlike what happens in Argentina, I know you managed to have parliamentary representation at different levels, I know you produced several intellectuals, especially black women, who have been producing knowledge from negritude and to negritude. We have a lot to learn from these struggles that take place in other parts of the continent.

I definitely believe that we must create more spaces for the articulation and empowerment of women and Afro-descendant diversities on the continent, generating meetings, dialogues and exchanges that enrich our own struggles and resistance. We are 200 million people of African descent in the Americas. We must be able to create a continental force in such a way that it is inevitable that American states will pay attention to our demands. With different forms and consequences, racism manifests itself across the continent, so the response must be collective and cross-border.

Patricia Gomes: the lives and struggles of black people in ‘white’ Argentina
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
The Commission for the historical recognition of the Afro-Argentine Community

The National Institute Against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism (INADI) conducted a meeting this Monday to begin the process of historical reparations as part of the National Day of Afro-Argentines and African Culture alongside government officials.

Published on Monday, November 9, 2020

Today, almost 20 years after the commitments made by the State during the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Forms of Intolerance, the first meeting between national government officials was held to start the National Commission for the historical recognition of the Afro-Argentine Community, promoted by INADI.

Marking a fundamental step on the road to ethnic-racial equity, historical reparations and social justice, in this first meeting, the conference was moderated by INADI advisor Federico Pita, with presentations by INADI's figurehead, Victoria Donda; the Minister of Justice and Human Rights, Marcela Losardo; the Ambassador to the Holy See, María Fernanda Silva; the Minister of Education, Nicolás Trotta; the Secretary for Human Rights, Horacio Pietragalla; the Vice Chancellor of the Nation, Pablo Tettamanti; the Governor of Entre Ríos, Gustavo Bordet and the Governor of Santiago del Estero, Gerardo Zamora.

"We in the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights and the Secretariat of Human Rights of the Nation have the challenge of setting up new agendas, with concrete actions", said Victoria Donda. "Let it be us, the recovered grandchildren, the ones who recover history. Together with Horacio Pietragalla we have the responsibility of carrying out this task and bringing it into line", she said.

"The Afro-descendant population was key in the struggle for the independence of the Nation and yet, they have been historically neglected and invisibilized. I celebrate this space for equity and the full profession and empowerment of the rights and guarantees of the community", said Marcela Losardo.

Similarly, Nicolás Trotta said that "there are almost two million Argentines descended from people who were enslaved. Our country was built on a heterogeneous base of diverse cultures. The educational system has to shed light on these stories in order to build our identity".

"We are going to work because the cause needs all of our attention and the greatest effort to recover this year lost during the pandemic. It is essential that in the next census there are questions for the community, for who is perceived as Afro-descendant", said Horacio Pietragalla.

Pablo Tettamanti said that he celebrates INADI's initiative as it "brings us closer to the objectives we have undertaken. We must incorporate greater representation of Afro-descendants across all fields".

Historically, the Argentine Afro-descendant community — made up of more than two million descendants of Africans brought as enslaved labor to the country — has been a invisible, neglected and othered population, a product of the structural racism that operates in our society. The creation of this commission seeks to expand the work carried out, in aspects not yet addressed, providing a focal point within the National Public Administration that addresses the specificity of the demands and proposals of said community.

"Our challenge forces us to value and support Afro-Argentine culture and partake in this cultural battle. It is very important for us to be participating in this event and we appreciate the invitation", said Gustavo Bordet.

"This Commission begins to value and break the historical invisibility towards the Afro-descendant population; we must generate this recognition for a more just world. You can count on Santiago del Estero for this job", said Gerardo Zamora.

For her part, María Fernanda Silva finished the meeting by saying: “our homeland was built by us, from the beginning. We are not the native/indigenous peoples, but we have shared the long, young and hopeful history of this homeland. There's no doubt about it”.

The National Institute Against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism's goal is to develop national policies to combat all forms of discrimination, xenophobia and racism, promoting and carrying out federal and transversal public policies articulated with civil society, and aimed at achieving a diverse and egalitarian society.

The Commission for the historical recognition of the Afro-Argentine Community
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,221
Reputation
10,619
Daps
122,117
Sectoral Vice President Aristóbulo Istúriz holds meeting with African representatives

Written by Joselyn Ariza on December 10, 2020. Posted in Noticias

WhatsApp-Image-2020-12-10-at-4.37.14-PM.jpeg


Representing the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Sectoral Vice President for Social and Territorial Development, Aristóbulo Istúriz, participated last Tuesday in a meeting with members of parliament from the Republic of Kenya.

During the meeting, Japheth Kiplangat Mutai and Bernard Otieno Okoth, members of the Constitutional Implementation Oversight Committee of the National Assembly and Mary Luka Lemerele, member of the Justice and Legal Affairs Committee of the National Assembly of Kenya, related their experience as electoral observers highlighting the strength of the Venezuelan electoral system, which, in their opinion, should be emulated in the world, due to its transparency, speed, auditability and biosecurity.

The parliamentarians expressed their admiration after seeing how the Venezuelan State was able to carry out the elections amid great challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the blockade against the country.

Likewise, they thanked Venezuela for the support they have received as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, while highlighting the importance of Latin American and African unity as a transcendental alliance for the well-being of the peoples.

At the same time, they recognized the work of the Bolivarian Government in matters of social protection, where education — up to university level — and health care are free, compared to their country.

For his part, the vice president for social and territorial development presented — succinctly — the achievements of the Bolivarian Revolution through social missions in the areas of education, health, food, culture and sports, which have vindicated the policies of Commander Hugo Chávez and have continued in the management of President Nicolás Maduro.

He said that this prioritization of public policies has become the target of the Venezuelan opposition to promote violence in the country, under the auspices and financing of the United States Government, which, in addition, has imposed — illegally — unilateral coercive measures on Venezuela.

He also highlighted the importance of articulation between the peoples of the Global South, and “the creation of the Afro-descendant and African International Cumbe and its concept, as a space of resistance for concrete actions”.

African solidarity and South–South cooperation

Minutes later, Sectoral Vice President Aristóbulo Istúriz also held a meeting with the Secretary General of the Congolese Communist Party of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sylvere Boswa, in which he thanked the leader's participation as a witness to the electoral process and for the African Declaration of Solidarity with the Venezuelan people and President Nicolás Maduro issued by more than 93 organizations and political parties.

On this, the Secretary General of the Congolese Communist Party said that “the elections in Venezuela are the victory of the people and the victory against imperialism”.

Boswa declared that he came to Venezuela in order to make known his intention to create an organic structure between the left parties and movements in Africa in solidarity with Venezuela and the Bolivarian Revolution with a legal character and with an impact on the African Union.

For their part, the newly elected deputies representing the Afro-descendant sector, Casimira Monasterio and Nirva Camacho, presented the progress of the Constitution of the Republic in terms of ethnic and cultural plurality, and equal rights. At the same time, they highlighted the importance of South-South cooperation and being able to show the world the true face of Africa and Latin America.

It should be noted that both meetings were attended by, on the part of Venezuela, Deputy Minister for Africa Yuri Pimentel; the Venezuelan Ambassador to the Republic of the Congo, Aníbal Márquez, as well as the Minister of Popular Power for Women and Gender Equality, Carolys Pérez; the deputies to the National Assembly representing the Afro-descendant sector, Casimira Monasterio and Nirva Camacho, and the representative of the Afro-descendant and African International Cumbe, Fravia Máquez.

Sectoral Vice President Aristóbulo Istúriz holds meeting with African representatives
 
Last edited:
Top